Beibit Zhukayev and Elmar Ejupovic will square off in the qualifications of the San Luis Potosi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on ESTADIO. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Beibit Zhukayev who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Beibit Zhukayev is the pick to win this match.
Beibit Zhukayev -> 1.185
Elmar Ejupovic -> 4.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Beibit Zhukayev vs. Elmar Ejupovic
There is no head to head record between Beibit Zhukayev and Elmar Ejupovic since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Beibit Zhukayev
3 - 5win/loss
218
171
WWLWLWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-21 | 11-12 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-30 | 19-16 | 1-3 | 11-8 | 2-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 43-30 | 33-21 | 1-2 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 13-10 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 191, Zhukayev reached the qualifications after defeating Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros 6-4 7-60.
In the qualifications, The Kazakhstani had a good straight sets win against Fernando Rubio Fierros (6-4 7-60). During the match, Zhukayev scored 85 points vs Fernando Rubio Fierros’s 72. Beibit was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zhukayev blasted 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Beibit Zhukayev lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Zhukayev put 61% of his first serves in, winning 67% (34/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the 2nd serve. The Kazakhstani broke Fernando Rubio Fierros 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Zhukayev has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 52% of his matches (140-128). 1-0 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Zhukayev has an overall22-35 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Beibit has a compiled 2-5 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Luis Potosi Challenger
Zhukayev has never competed in this tournament before.
Elmar Ejupovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-20 | 1-2 | 19-11 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 30-34 | 4-7 | 16-17 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2022 | 46-28 | 4-2 | 32-19 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2021 | 34-25 | 1-2 | 23-17 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2020 | 18-8 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 10-3 |
Ranked no. 476, the German reached the qualifications after beating Ryan Seggerman 7-61 7-5.
In the qualifications, Ejupovic had a good straight sets win against Seggerman (7-61 7-5). During the match Ejupovic scored 72 points vs Seggerman’s 56. Elmar was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Ejupovic blasted 12 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Elmar Ejupovic was extremely efficient on serve to win 90% (38/42) of his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Elmar broke Seggerman once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Ejupovic’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Glasgow Challenger.
The German has a composed 5-8 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Luis Potosi Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zhukayev | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 25 |
| Pts | 85-72 | 72-56 |
| Total Points | 157 | 128 |
| Winners | 34 | 38 |
| %Winners | 40% | 53% |
Both Zhukayev and Ejupovic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Zhukayev and Ejupovic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Zhukayev played 2 games less than Ejupovic. Beibit scored 34 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The German made 38 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zhukayev | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 12 |
| 1st in | 51/84 | 42/61 |
| %1st in | 61% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 34/51 | 38/42 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 90% |
| 2nd pts | 17/33 | 14/19 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 74% |
Zhukayev made 3 aces . Ejupovic scored 12 aces . Zhukayev won 67% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Ejupovic won 90% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 74% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zhukayev | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 1 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 1/2 |
| % Converted | 40% | 50% |
| Conceded | 8 | 0 |
| Saved | 5 | 0 |
| % Saved | 63% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
The Kazakhstani broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Zhukayev surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Elmar broke his opponent once with a 50% conversion rate. The German was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Zhukayev | |||
| Q1 Fernando Rubio Fierros |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-60 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 85-72 | 85-72 | |
| Total points | 157 | 157 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 51/84 | 51/84 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 34/51 | 34/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/33 | 17/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Ejupovic | |||
| Q1 Seggerman |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 72-56 | 72-56 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/61 | 42/61 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 38/42 | 38/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/19 | 14/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/2 | 1/2 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWLWLLWL
LLWWWLWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto CidCid – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaKaliyanda Poonacha – Andres AndradeAndrade (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Bernard TomicTomic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Antoine BellierBellier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias SotoSoto – Facundo MenaMena (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
