Elmar Ejupovic and Stuart Parker will face off in the quarter of the Glasgow Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 4:00 pm on COURT 6. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Stuart Parker who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Stuart Parker is the pick to win this match.
Stuart Parker -> 1.83
Elmar Ejupovic -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elmar Ejupovic vs. Stuart Parker
There is no head to head record between Elmar Ejupovic and Stuart Parker since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Elmar Ejupovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-27 | 7-5 | 19-12 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 30-34 | 4-7 | 16-17 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2022 | 46-28 | 4-2 | 32-19 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2021 | 34-25 | 1-2 | 23-17 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2020 | 18-8 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 10-3 |
Ranked no. 433, Elmar got to the quarter after defeating Benjamin Lock 7-5 6-4 and Charles Broom 6-4 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The German had a good straight sets win against Broom (6-4 6-3). During the match, Ejupovic scored 64 points vs Broom’s 59. Ejupovic was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ejupovic made 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Elmar Ejupovic conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Ejupovic put 65% of his first serves in, winning 81% (34/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (8/23) on the 2nd serve. Elmar broke Broom 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Ejupovic has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (307-228). 3-4 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ejupovic has an overall 62-49 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Elmar has an aggregate 3-5 win-loss record in 2024, 3-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
Ejupovic has never competed in this tournament before.
Stuart Parker
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-21 | 29-13 | 0-2 | 10-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-21 | 18-12 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 7-5 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 44-16 | 40-12 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 24-10 | 18-8 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
Ranked no. 733, Stuart reached the quarter after defeating Hynek Barton 6-2 6-4, Gianmarco Ferrari 7-5 7-61, Filip Peliwo 6-4 6-3 and Kyle Edmund 7-64 7-65.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Peliwo (6-4 6-3). During the match Parker scored 71 points vs Peliwo’s 56. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Parker recorded 7 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Stuart Parker was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (30/37) of his 1st serve and 53% (8/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Stuart broke Peliwo 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
The Brit’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Monastir.
Stuart has an overall 11-3 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ejupovic | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 41 | 88 |
| Pts | 129-108 | 328-264 |
| Total Points | 237 | 592 |
| Winners | 66 | 149 |
| %Winners | 51% | 45% |
Ejupovic played 2 matches while Parker competed in 4 matches. Parker started his run from the qualifications while Ejupovic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Ejupovic has played 4 set(s) less than Parker (4 vs 8). Therefore, Ejupovic played 47 games less than Parker. Ejupovic scored 66 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Parker fired 149 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ejupovic | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 31 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 7.8 |
| 1st in | 80/119 | 184/266 |
| %1st in | 67% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 66/80 | 149/184 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 18/39 | 45/82 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 55% |
Ejupovic made 11 aces (5.5 per match). Parker made 31 aces (7.8 per match). Ejupovic won 83% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Parker won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ejupovic | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 10 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 10/31 |
| % Converted | 43% | 32% |
| Conceded | 6 | 12 |
| Saved | 5 | 9 |
| % Saved | 83% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Elmar broke his opponents 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Ejupovic surrendered his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Stuart broke his opponents 10 times with a 32% conversion rate. Stuart conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ejupovic | ||||
| R1 Lock |
R2 Broom |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 19 | 41 | |
| pts | 65-49 | 64-59 | 129-108 | |
| Total points | 114 | 123 | 237 | |
| Winners | 32 | 34 | 66 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 53% | 51% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/54 | 42/65 | 80/119 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 65% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 32/38 | 34/42 | 66/80 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 81% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 8/23 | 18/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 35% | 46% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/10 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 30% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Parker | |||||
| Q1 Barton |
Q3 Ferrari |
R1 Peliwo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 7-5 7-61 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 25 | 19 | 62 | |
| pts | 78-62 | 84-66 | 71-56 | 233-184 | |
| Total points | 140 | 150 | 127 | 417 | |
| Winners | 27 | 40 | 30 | 97 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 48% | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 7 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 40/62 | 50/71 | 37/52 | 127/185 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 70% | 71% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 40/50 | 30/37 | 97/127 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 80% | 81% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 11/21 | 8/15 | 33/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 52% | 53% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 3/8 | 3/8 | 10/27 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 38% | 38% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 | 0 | 12 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 5/7 | 0/0 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 71% | – | 76% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLWWL
LWWLWLWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Stuart ParkerParker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Nicola KuhnKuhn (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hamish StewartStewart – Clement ChidekhChidekh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
