Gastao Elias and Cem Ilkel will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Manama Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 5:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gastao Elias who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Gastao Elias is the pick to win this match.
Gastao Elias -> 1.5
Cem Ilkel -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gastao Elias vs. Cem Ilkel
This will be the 3rd time that Gastao Elias and Cem Ilkel clash against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Elias (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Elias won 6-2 6-3 in the 1st round in the Oeiras 2 Challenger back in January 2024.
Gastao Elias
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 42-32 | 8-5 | 27-25 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 21-18 | 10-8 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-24 | 4-3 | 18-17 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 37-18 | 13-5 | 24-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 295, Gastao reached the 1st round after defeating Marko Nikolic 6-3 6-1 and Yanki Erel 1-6 7-65 7-5.
In the qualifications against Erel, Gastao recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 7-65 7-5).During the match, Elias scored less points (13) than Erel. In fact, the world no. 295 won 93 points vs Erel’s. That means that Elias was more focused during the important points. The Portuguese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about the service games, Elias recorded 8 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Gastao Elias lost the serve 4 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Elias put 62% of his first serves in, winning 75% (46/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (14/38) on the 2nd serve. The Portuguese broke Erel 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gastao started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 1 set in this competition to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Elias has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (267-214). 2-0 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Elias has an overall 59-55 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Elias’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Oeiras 1 Challenger.
Elias has an overall 9-2 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Manama Challenger
Gastao has never competed in this tournament before.
Cem Ilkel
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 16-27 | 7-13 | 4-7 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 33-29 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-16 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 16-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-29 | 17-9 | 13-11 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 324, Cem reached the 1st round after defeating Vladyslav Orlov 2-6 6-1 6-2 and Marat Sharipov (RUS) 6-1 ret..
In the qualifications against Sharipov (RUS), Ilkel had a free pass after Sharipov (RUS) retired on a 6-1 . scoreline.
The Turk has a composed 4-4 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Elias | Ilkel |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
Tot Games | 48 | 30 |
Pts | 149-138 | 99-74 |
Total Points | 287 | 173 |
Winners | 69 | 44 |
%Winners | 46% | 44% |
Both Elias and Ilkel played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Gastao Elias dropped 1 set, while Cem Ilkel surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Elias and Ilkel have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Elias played 18 games more than Ilkel. Elias scored 69 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Turk recorded 44 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Elias | Ilkel |
---|---|---|
Aces | 13 | 12 |
Avg per match | 6.5 | 6 |
1st in | 91/139 | 57/89 |
%1st in | 65% | 64% |
1st pts | 69/91 | 44/57 |
%1st pts | 76% | 77% |
2nd pts | 19/48 | 18/32 |
%2nd pts | 40% | 56% |
Elias fired 13 aces (6.5 per match). Ilkel struck 12 aces (6 per match). Elias won 76% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Elias | Ilkel |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 6 |
Converted | 9/16 | 6/8 |
% Converted | 56% | 75% |
Conceded | 16 | 7 |
Saved | 10 | 5 |
% Saved | 63% | 71% |
Times Broken | 6 | 2 |
Gastao broke his opponents 9 times with a 56% conversion rate. Gastao conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Ilkel broke his opponents 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Ilkel conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
Elias | ||||
Q1 Nikolic |
Q3 Erel |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-1 | 1-6 7-65 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 32 | 48 | |
pts | 56-32 | 93-106 | 149-138 | |
Total points | 88 | 199 | 287 | |
Winners | 23 | 46 | 69 | |
%Winners | 41% | 49% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 7 | 8 | |
1st in | 30/40 | 61/99 | 91/139 | |
% 1st in | 75% | 62% | 65% | |
1st pts | 23/30 | 46/61 | 69/91 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 75% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 5/10 | 14/38 | 19/48 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 37% | 40% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
Converted | 6/9 | 3/7 | 9/16 | |
Converted % | 67% | 43% | 56% | |
Conceded | 3 | 13 | 16 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 9/13 | 10 | |
Saved % | 33% | 69% | 51% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Ilkel | ||||
Q1 Orlov |
Q3 Sharipov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 6-1 6-2 | 6-1 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 7 | 30 | |
pts | 72-60 | 27-14 | 99-74 | |
Total points | 132 | 41 | 173 | |
Winners | 32 | 12 | 44 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
1st in | 42/68 | 15/21 | 57/89 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 71% | 64% | |
1st pts | 32/42 | 12/15 | 44/57 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 80% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 14/26 | 4/6 | 18/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 67% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 2/2 | 6/8 | |
Converted % | 67% | 100% | 75% | |
Conceded | 7 | 0 | 7 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 0/0 | 5 | |
Saved % | 71% | – | 36% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Manama Challenger
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – Cem IlkelIlkel (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Billy HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yusuf QaedQaed – Fabio FogniniFognini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Nerman FaticFatic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Laurent LokoliLokoli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction