Patrick Kypson and Ethan Quinn will play each other in the final of the Cleveland Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Kypson is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.71
Ethan Quinn -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Patrick Kypson vs. Ethan Quinn
This will be the 3rd time that Patrick Kypson and Ethan Quinn fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Kypson (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Kypson won 6-4 6-2 in the semifinal in the Champaign Challenger back in 2023.
Patrick Kypson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-27 | 8-11 | 4-7 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 185, Patrick got to the final after defeating Nathan Ponwith 6-3 6-2, Murphy Cassone 6-4 7-64, Emilio Nava 4-6 7-61 6-4 and James Duckworth 6-3 7-61.
In the quarter against Nava, Kypson recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-61 6-4). During the match, Kypson scored 103 points vs Nava’s 98. Kypson was quite aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kypson blasted 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Patrick Kypson was very effective on serve to win 83% (50/60) of his 1st serve and 52% (26/50) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kypson broke Nava once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kypson has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Kypson has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 65% of his matches (186-102). 3-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kypson has a compiled 30-15 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Patrick has a composed 5-3 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 337, the American reached the final after beating Aidan Mayo 6-3 6-3, Stefan Kozlov 6-2 4-6 6-3, Thai Kwiatkowski 7-67 5-7 6-4 and Denis Kudla 6-3 6-4.
In the semifinal, Ethan had a good straight sets win against Kudla (6-3 6-4). During the match Quinn scored 65 points vs Kudla’s 55. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Quinn fired 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Ethan Quinn was very effective on serve to win 75% (27/36) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Kudla 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Ethan has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Ethan’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Cleveland Challenger.
Quinn has a composed 5-3 win-loss record in 2024, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kypson | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 95 | 99 |
| Pts | 316-263 | 358-316 |
| Total Points | 579 | 674 |
| Winners | 135 | 146 |
| %Winners | 43% | 41% |
Both Kypson and Quinn played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Patrick Kypson lost 1 set, while Ethan Quinn lost 2 sets. Kypson has played 1 set(s) less than Quinn (9 vs 10). Therefore, Kypson played 4 games less than Quinn. Kypson scored 135 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Ethan recorded 146 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kypson | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 38 | 29 |
| Avg per match | 9.5 | 7.3 |
| 1st in | 163/298 | 197/333 |
| %1st in | 55% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 135/163 | 146/197 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 78/135 | 75/136 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 55% |
Kypson managed to score 38 aces (9.5 per match). Quinn recorded 29 aces (7.3 per match). Kypson won 83% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kypson | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 13 |
| Converted | 8/16 | 13/40 |
| % Converted | 50% | 33% |
| Conceded | 20 | 28 |
| Saved | 17 | 22 |
| % Saved | 85% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 6 |
Patrick broke his opponents 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded. Ethan broke his opponents 13 times with a 33% conversion rate. Ethan conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kypson | |||||
| R1 Ponwith |
R2 Cassone |
1/4 Nava |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 7-64 | 4-6 7-61 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 23 | 33 | 73 | |
| pts | 63-40 | 76-68 | 103-98 | 242-206 | |
| Total points | 103 | 144 | 201 | 448 | |
| Winners | 30 | 26 | 50 | 106 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 34% | 49% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | 5 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 34/49 | 35/71 | 60/110 | 129/230 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 49% | 55% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 30/34 | 26/35 | 50/60 | 106/129 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 74% | 83% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 21/36 | 26/50 | 55/101 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 58% | 52% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/7 | 1/3 | 7/15 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 43% | 33% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 | 9 | 17 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 6/8 | 8/9 | 14 | |
| Saved % | – | 75% | 89% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Quinn | ||||||
| R1 Mayo |
R2 Kozlov |
1/4 Kwiatkowski |
1/2 Kudla |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | 7-67 5-7 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 27 | 35 | 19 | 99 | |
| pts | 75-55 | 98-86 | 120-120 | 65-55 | 358-316 | |
| Total points | 130 | 184 | 240 | 120 | 674 | |
| Winners | 23 | 41 | 55 | 27 | 146 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 42% | 46% | 42% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 29 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 29/51 | 54/95 | 78/125 | 36/62 | 197/333 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | 62% | 58% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 41/54 | 55/78 | 27/36 | 146/197 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 76% | 71% | 75% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 23/41 | 23/47 | 15/26 | 75/136 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 56% | 49% | 58% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 3/10 | 13/40 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 33% | 43% | 30% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 28 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 7/8 | 8/11 | 5/6 | 22 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 88% | 73% | 83% | 104% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWLWW
WWWWWLLWWL Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- George Goldhoff/James Kent TrotterGoldhoff/James Kent Trotter – William Blumberg/Alex LawsonBlumberg/Alex Lawson (6-70 6-3 10-8) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
