Tim Handel and Andre Ilagan will square off in the 2nd round of the Indian Wells 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on PC6. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andre Ilagan who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andre Ilagan is the pick to win this match.
Andre Ilagan -> 1.49
Tim Handel -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tim Handel vs. Andre Ilagan
There is no head to head record between Tim Handel and Andre Ilagan since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Tim Handel
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 27-26 | 2-2 | 22-19 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 49-30 | 2-3 | 41-19 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
2022 | 32-22 | 5-2 | 22-15 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2021 | 43-22 | 9-9 | 31-11 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-5 | 7-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 387, Handel reached the 2nd round after beating Matias Soto 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Soto (6-4 6-4). During the match, Handel scored 65 points vs Soto’s 59. Handel was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Handel blasted 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Tim Handel was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The German broke Soto 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Handel has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 62% of his matches (154-96). 2-1 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Handel has an aggregate32-25 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Handel has a composed 3-2 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger
Andre Ilagan
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 50-29 | 41-22 | 0-0 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 19-6 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 15-7 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 662, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Darian King 6-4 5-7 6-2, Jaimee Floyd Angele 6-1 6-1 and Federico Gaio 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round, Andre had a good straight sets win against Gaio (6-2 7-5). During the match Ilagan scored 66 points vs Gaio’s 54. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilagan couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Andre Ilagan lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Ilagan put 77% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the 2nd serve. Ilagan broke Gaio 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Ilagan has an overall 3-1 win-loss record in 2024, 3-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Handel | Ilagan |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
Tot Games | 20 | 64 |
Pts | 65-59 | 217-167 |
Total Points | 124 | 384 |
Winners | 27 | 98 |
%Winners | 42% | 45% |
Handel played 1 match while Ilagan competed in 3 matches. Ilagan started his run from the qualifications while Handel had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Andre Ilagan dropped 1 set while Tim Handel hasn’t dropped a set so far. Handel has played 5 set(s) less than Ilagan (2 vs 7). Therefore, Handel played 44 games less than Ilagan. Handel scored 27 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Andre scored 98 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Handel | Ilagan |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 4 |
Avg per match | 6 | 1.3 |
1st in | 35/62 | 131/183 |
%1st in | 56% | 72% |
1st pts | 27/35 | 98/131 |
%1st pts | 77% | 75% |
2nd pts | 14/27 | 32/52 |
%2nd pts | 52% | 62% |
Handel fired 6 aces . Ilagan managed to score 4 aces (1.3 per match). Handel won 77% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Ilagan won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Handel | Ilagan |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 12 |
Converted | 3/7 | 12/24 |
% Converted | 43% | 50% |
Conceded | 4 | 10 |
Saved | 3 | 8 |
% Saved | 75% | 80% |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Handel broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Handel lost his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Andre broke his opponents 12 times with a 50% conversion rate. Ilagan conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Handel | |||
R1 Soto |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 65-59 | 65-59 | |
Total points | 124 | 124 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 35/62 | 35/62 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 27/35 | 27/35 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 14/27 | 14/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Ilagan | |||||
Q1 King |
Q3 Floyd |
R1 Gaio |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | 6-1 6-1 | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 14 | 20 | 64 | |
pts | 96-83 | 55-30 | 66-54 | 217-167 | |
Total points | 179 | 85 | 120 | 384 | |
Winners | 47 | 20 | 31 | 98 | |
%Winners | 49% | 36% | 47% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
1st in | 63/91 | 24/35 | 44/57 | 131/183 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | 77% | 72% | |
1st pts | 47/63 | 20/24 | 31/44 | 98/131 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 83% | 70% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 16/28 | 8/11 | 8/13 | 32/52 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 73% | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 5 | 4 | 12 | |
Converted | 3/8 | 5/8 | 4/8 | 12/24 | |
Converted % | 38% | 63% | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 6 | 0 | 4 | 10 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 0/0 | 3/4 | 8 | |
Saved % | 83% | – | 75% | 158% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Indian Wells 2 Challenger
- Tim HandelHandel – Matias SotoSoto (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara – Matija PecoticPecotic (7-65 0-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Maxwell MckennonMckennon (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Thomas Fancutt/Ajeet RaiFancutt/Ajeet Rai – Mac Kiger/Benjamin SigouinKiger/Benjamin Sigouin (6-4 3-6 10-6) – See score progression
- Bor ArtnakArtnak – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Ozan BarisBaris (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Omni KumarKumar (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Gabriel DebruDebru (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yshai OlielOliel – Benjamin LockLock (3-6 7-63 6-0) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-6 7-64 7-63) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Evan ZhuZhu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Lucas GerchGerch (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Giovanni OradiniOradini (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Bor ArtnakArtnak – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara – Matija PecoticPecotic (7-6(5) 0-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Maxwell MckennonMckennon (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Ozan BarisBaris (7-6(1) 6-2) – See score progression
- Tim HandelHandel – Matias SotoSoto (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim HandelHandel – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction