![Prediction And Head To Head James Duckworth Vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong 00jjivw5pc Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Prediction-and-head-to-head-James-Duckworth-vs.-Chak-Lam-Coleman-Wong-00JjiVW5pc.jpg)
James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Yokohama Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:30 pm on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Duckworth who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, James Duckworth is the pick to win this match.
James Duckworth -> 1.23
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 3.84
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
This will be the 3rd time that James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Duckworth (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Duckworth won 7-5 7-5 in the final in the Playford Challenger back in October 2023.
James Duckworth
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-17 | 16-8 | 2-3 | 5-2 | 10-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 51-28 | 43-21 | 1-3 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-27 | 20-18 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-24 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 12-9 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-10 | 9-4 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 109, Duckworth reached the 2nd round after beating Zdenek Kolar 6-2 6-74 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Australian defeated Kolar (6-2 6-74 6-2). During the match, Duckworth scored 101 points vs Kolar’s 82. James was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Duckworth recorded 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. James Duckworth was quite effective on serve to win 78% (45/58) of his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Duckworth broke Kolar 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Duckworth has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (307-200). 43-21 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Duckworth has a composed 210-121 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Shenzhen 2 Challenger where he beat Chak Lam Coleman Wong in the final 6-0 6-1 and the Playford Challenger where he overcame Chak Lam Coleman Wong in the final 7-5 7-5.
The Australian has an overall 51-28 win-loss record in 2023, 43-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokohama Challenger
James has never competed in this tournament before.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-18 | 14-12 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 296, the got to the 2nd round after beating Altug Celikbilek 2-6 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round against Celikbilek, Chak recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 92 points vs Celikbilek’s 79. Lam Coleman Wong was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Lam Coleman Wong recorded 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 61% of his first serves in, winning 67% (32/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (14/31) on the 2nd serve. The broke Celikbilek 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Chak’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Hong Kong,M15 Doha,the Shenzhen 2 Challenger and the Playford Challenger.
Chak has a composed 50-25 win-loss record in 2023, 39-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Duckworth | Lam Coleman Wong |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 29 | 25 |
Pts | 101-82 | 92-79 |
Total Points | 183 | 171 |
Winners | 45 | 32 |
%Winners | 45% | 35% |
Both Duckworth and Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. James Duckworth lost 1 set, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Duckworth and Lam Coleman Wong have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Duckworth played 4 games more than Lam Coleman Wong. Duckworth scored 45 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The managed to score 32 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Duckworth | Lam Coleman Wong |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 5 |
Avg per match | 8 | 5 |
1st in | 58/88 | 48/79 |
%1st in | 66% | 61% |
1st pts | 45/58 | 32/48 |
%1st pts | 78% | 67% |
2nd pts | 19/30 | 14/31 |
%2nd pts | 63% | 45% |
Duckworth fired 8 aces . Lam Coleman Wong recorded 5 aces . Duckworth won 78% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Duckworth | Lam Coleman Wong |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 6 |
Converted | 4/11 | 6/12 |
% Converted | 36% | 50% |
Conceded | 6 | 11 |
Saved | 6 | 7 |
% Saved | 100% | 64% |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Duckworth broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Australian pretty effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 6 break points. Chak broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Chak conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
Duckworth | |||
R1 Kolar |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-74 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 101-82 | 101-82 | |
Total points | 183 | 183 | |
Winners | 45 | 45 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 58/88 | 58/88 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 45/58 | 45/58 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Lam Coleman Wong | |||
R1 Celikbilek |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 92-79 | 92-79 | |
Total points | 171 | 171 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 48/79 | 48/79 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 32/48 | 32/48 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 14/31 | 14/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |
Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Yokohama Challenger
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (2-6 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Li TuTu – Andres MartinMartin (2-6 6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Li TuTu – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Mathys ErhardErhard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction