Patrick Kypson and Ethan Quinn will face off in the semifinal of the Champaign Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 5:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ethan Quinn is the pick to win this match.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.8
Patrick Kypson -> 1.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Patrick Kypson vs. Ethan Quinn
This will be the 2nd time that Patrick Kypson and Ethan Quinn clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kypson (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Kypson won 6-3 6-2 in the 1st round in M15 Los Angeles back in 2022.
Patrick Kypson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-21 | 6-10 | 4-7 | 5-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239 (career-high), Kypson reached the semifinal after defeating Mark Whitehouse 6-1 7-65, Kenta Miyoshi 6-3 6-1 and Aleksandar Kovacevic 7-62 4-6 6-3.
In the quarter, Patrick defeated Kovacevic (7-62 4-6 6-3). During the match, Kypson scored 107 points vs Kovacevic’s 97. Patrick was very aggressive to blast 60 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kypson fired 16 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Patrick Kypson lost the serve once and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Kypson put 66% of his first serves in, winning 81% (60/74) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (17/38) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Kovacevic once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kypson has surrendered 1 set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Kypson has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 64% of his matches (179-99). 9-4 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kypson has a compiled25-15 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Medellin Challenger where he beat Benjamin Lock in the final 6-3 6-3.
Kypson has an aggregate 36-21 win-loss record in 2023, 9-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-30 | 15-17 | 2-7 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 374 (career-high), Ethan reached the semifinal after beating Emilio Nava 6-3 6-2, Strong Kirchheimer 6-1 6-4 and Nino Serdarusic 6-3 6-3.
In the quarter, Ethan had a good straight sets win against Serdarusic (6-3 6-3). During the match Quinn scored 58 points vs Serdarusic’s 44. Ethan was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Quinn blasted 2 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Ethan Quinn was very effective on serve to win 76% (22/29) of his 1st serve and 78% (14/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ethan broke Serdarusic 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Quinn hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Wichita.
Ethan has a compiled 21-15 win-loss record in 2023, 8-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kypson | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 68 | 52 |
| Pts | 235-183 | 201-154 |
| Total Points | 418 | 355 |
| Winners | 113 | 86 |
| %Winners | 48% | 43% |
Both Kypson and Quinn played 3 matches. At the moment, Patrick Kypson dropped 1 set while Ethan Quinn hasn’t conceded a set so far. Kypson has played 1 set more than Quinn (7 vs 6). Therefore, Kypson played 16 games more than Quinn. Kypson scored 113 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Ethan scored 86 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kypson | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 35 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 11.7 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 137/214 | 122/183 |
| %1st in | 64% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 113/137 | 86/122 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 42/77 | 35/61 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 57% |
Kypson fired 35 aces (11.7 per match). Quinn bagged 13 aces (4.3 per match). Kypson won 82% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kypson | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 11 |
| Converted | 8/17 | 11/27 |
| % Converted | 47% | 41% |
| Conceded | 14 | 12 |
| Saved | 13 | 10 |
| % Saved | 93% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Kypson broke his opponents 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. Kypson conceded his serve once and he saved 93% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 11 times with a 41% conversion rate. Ethan conceded his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kypson | |||||
| R1 Whitehouse |
R2 Miyoshi |
1/4 Kovacevic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-65 | 6-3 6-1 | 7-62 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 | 32 | 68 | |
| pts | 70-52 | 58-34 | 107-97 | 235-183 | |
| Total points | 122 | 92 | 204 | 418 | |
| Winners | 31 | 22 | 60 | 113 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 38% | 56% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 8 | 16 | 35 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 36/55 | 27/47 | 74/112 | 137/214 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 57% | 66% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 31/36 | 22/27 | 60/74 | 113/137 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 81% | 81% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 12/20 | 17/38 | 42/77 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 60% | 45% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/6 | 1/3 | 8/17 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 67% | 33% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 12 | 14 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 0/0 | 11/12 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 92% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Quinn | |||||
| R1 Nava |
R2 Kirchheimer |
1/4 Serdarusic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 18 | 52 | |
| pts | 68-52 | 75-58 | 58-44 | 201-154 | |
| Total points | 120 | 133 | 102 | 355 | |
| Winners | 33 | 31 | 22 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 41% | 38% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 6 | 2 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 40/62 | 53/74 | 29/47 | 122/183 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 72% | 62% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 33/40 | 31/53 | 22/29 | 86/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 58% | 76% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/22 | 12/21 | 14/18 | 35/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 57% | 78% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 5/8 | 3/10 | 11/27 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 63% | 30% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 5 | 0 | 12 | |
| Saved | 7/7 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 60% | – | 53% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLWLW
LLWLWLWLWL Tennis Scores in Champaign Challenger
- Lucas Horve/Oliver OkonkwoHorve/Oliver Okonkwo – George Goldhoff/Alfredo PerezGoldhoff/Alfredo Perez (7-63 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- John-Patrick Smith/Sem VerbeekSmith/Sem Verbeek – Alex Rybakov/Pedro Vives MarcosRybakov/Pedro Vives Marcos (6-4 3-6 10-7) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
