Sebastian Fanselow and Darian King will play each other in the qualifications of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on BRENDA MYERS COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sebastian Fanselow who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sebastian Fanselow is the pick to win this match.
Sebastian Fanselow -> 1.74
Darian King -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sebastian Fanselow vs. Darian King
There is no head to head record between Sebastian Fanselow and Darian King since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Sebastian Fanselow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-34 | 7-9 | 14-18 | 8-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-31 | 24-9 | 20-15 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-31 | 5-11 | 17-13 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 17-13 | 13-11 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 34-15 | 34-13 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 338, Sebastian reached the qualifications after defeating Fons Van Sambeek 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Sebastian had a good straight sets win against Van Sambeek (6-0 6-1). During the match, Fanselow scored 54 points vs Van Sambeek’s 24. The German was pretty aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Fanselow bagged 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Sebastian Fanselow was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (18/22) of his 1st serve and 70% (7/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Sebastian broke Van Sambeek 6 times after converting 86% of his break points (6/7).
Fanselow has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (309-197). 8-4 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Fanselow has a composed 21-22 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Fanselow’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula,M25 Wetzlar,M25 Sintra and M25 Tavira.
Sebastian has an overall 52-27 win-loss record in 2023, 8-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Darian King
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-10 | 17-7 | 10-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 14-9 | 11-5 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-14 | 6-7 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 476, Darian reached the qualifications after defeating Keegan Smith 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Darian had a good straight sets win against Smith (6-4 6-4). During the match King scored 66 points vs Smith’s 49. Darian was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, King bagged 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Darian King was quite effective on serve to win 85% (29/34) of his 1st serve and 79% (11/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. King broke Smith twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Darian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Ithaca,M15 Rochester and M15 Pittsburgh.
Darian has a composed 32-8 win-loss record in 2023, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fanselow | King |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 20 |
| Pts | 54-24 | 66-49 |
| Total Points | 78 | 115 |
| Winners | 18 | 29 |
| %Winners | 33% | 44% |
Both Fanselow and King played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fanselow and King have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fanselow played 7 games less than King. Fanselow scored 18 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Darian struck 29 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fanselow | King |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 7 |
| 1st in | 22/32 | 34/48 |
| %1st in | 69% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 18/22 | 29/34 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 7/10 | 11/14 |
| %2nd pts | 70% | 79% |
Fanselow fired 4 aces . King made 7 aces . Fanselow won 82% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, King won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 79% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fanselow | King |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 2 |
| Converted | 6/7 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 86% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Fanselow broke his opponent 6 times with a 86% conversion rate. The German pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. Darian broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. King was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Fanselow | |||
| Q1 Van |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 54-24 | 54-24 | |
| Total points | 78 | 78 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 22/32 | 22/32 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 18/22 | 18/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/7 | 6/7 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 86% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| King | |||
| Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 66-49 | 66-49 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 29/34 | 29/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/14 | 11/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 79% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWLLW
WWLL Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Dylan DietrichDietrich (7-61 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alafia AyeniAlafia – Evgeny KarlovskiyEvgeny (7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – Brandon HoltHolt (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Chris RodeschRodesch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Darian KingKing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
