Sara Sorribes Tormo and Maria Camila Osorio Serrano will play each other in the 2nd round of the Jiangxi Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 7:00 pm on Center Court. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sara Sorribes Tormo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sara Sorribes Tormo is the pick to win this match.
Sara Sorribes Tormo -> 1.53
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sara Sorribes Tormo vs. Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
This will be the 2nd time that Sara Sorribes Tormo and Maria Camila Osorio Serrano clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Sorribes Tormo (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Sorribes Tormo won 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 in the 1st round in Cleveland back in 2022.
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 10-18 | 2-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-17 | 10-6 | 17-9 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-18 | 9-10 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 31-20 | 24-11 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 17-13 | 4-7 | 9-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 55, Sara got to the 2nd round after defeating Xinyu Jiang 6-4 6-0.
In the 1st round, Sorribes Tormo had a good straight sets win against Jiang (6-4 6-0). During the match, Sorribes Tormo scored 58 points vs Jiang’s 33. Sorribes Tormo was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sorribes Tormo wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the encounter and she committed only 1 double fault. Sara Sorribes Tormo lost the serve twice and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Sorribes Tormo put 78% of her first serves in, winning 66% (21/32) of the points behind her 1st serve and 78% (7/9) on the 2nd serve. Sara broke Jiang 6 times after converting 67% of her break points (6/9).
Sorribes Tormo has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of her matches (316-224). 10-5 on hard in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Sorribes Tormo has a compiled 114-94 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Her best result of the current year was winning the title in Cleveland where she overcame Ekaterina Alexandrova in the final 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Sorribes Tormo has an overall 28-15 win-loss record in 2023, 10-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nanchang
Sara has never competed in this tournament before.
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 21-14 | 5-5 | 11-5 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 30-20 | 7-10 | 15-7 | 5-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 20-19 | 13-11 | 5-3 | 2-1 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 35-17 | 14-12 | 16-3 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-13 | 7-6 | 6-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 76, Camila Osorio Serrano reached the 2nd round after defeating Yexin Ma 6-1 6-0.
In the 1st round, Camila Osorio Serrano had a good straight sets win against Ma (6-1 6-0). During the match Camila Osorio Serrano scored 55 points vs Ma’s 29. Maria was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Camila Osorio Serrano made 4 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Maria Camila Osorio Serrano lost the serve once and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Camila Osorio Serrano put 53% of her first serves in, winning 84% (21/25) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (8/22) on the 2nd serve. Camila Osorio Serrano broke Ma 6 times after converting 46% of her break points (6/13).
Maria’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Lyon.
Maria has a compiled 27-19 win-loss record in 2023, 6-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Sorribes Tormo | Camila Osorio Serrano |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 16 | 13 |
Pts | 58-33 | 55-29 |
Total Points | 91 | 84 |
Winners | 21 | 21 |
%Winners | 36% | 38% |
Both Sorribes Tormo and Camila Osorio Serrano played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Sorribes Tormo and Camila Osorio Serrano have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Sorribes Tormo played 3 games more than Camila Osorio Serrano. The Spaniard scored 21 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Colombian made 21 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Sorribes Tormo | Camila Osorio Serrano |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 4 |
Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
1st in | 32/41 | 25/47 |
%1st in | 78% | 53% |
1st pts | 21/32 | 21/25 |
%1st pts | 66% | 84% |
2nd pts | 7/9 | 8/22 |
%2nd pts | 78% | 36% |
Sorribes Tormo didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Camila Osorio Serrano made 4 aces . Sorribes Tormo won 66% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 78% of the points. On the other side, Camila Osorio Serrano won 84% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 36% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Sorribes Tormo | Camila Osorio Serrano |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 6 |
Converted | 6/9 | 6/13 |
% Converted | 67% | 46% |
Conceded | 6 | 4 |
Saved | 4 | 3 |
% Saved | 67% | 75% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Sara broke her opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Sorribes Tormo lost her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. Maria broke her opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Colombian conceded her serve once and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded.
Sorribes Tormo | |||
R1 Jiang |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 58-33 | 58-33 | |
Total points | 91 | 91 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 32/41 | 32/41 | |
% 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
1st pts | 21/32 | 21/32 | |
% 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 7/9 | 7/9 | |
% 2nd pts | 78% | 78% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Camila Osorio Serrano | |||
R1 Ma |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
pts | 55-29 | 55-29 | |
Total points | 84 | 84 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 25/47 | 25/47 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 21/25 | 21/25 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 8/22 | 8/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Nanchang
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Xiaodi YouYou – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Valeria SavinykhSavinykh – Magda LinetteLinette (7-5 3-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Nao HibinoHibino – Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Ulrikke EikeriEikeri – Kaja JuvanJuvan (6-2 1-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Xinyu WangWang (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez – Hanyu GuoGuo (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Viktoria HruncakovaHruncakova (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Yuhan WangWang (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Xinyu JiangJiang (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Tereza Mihalikova/Yifan XuMihalikova/Yifan Xu – Shuo Feng/Wushuang ZhengFeng/Wushuang Zheng (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Arianne HartonoHartono (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Eri Hozumi/Makoto NinomiyaHozumi/Makoto Ninomiya – Yiming Dang/Fang Ying XunDang/Fang Ying Xun (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Yexin MaMa (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Amina AnshbaAnshba – Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan (2-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Sijia WeiWei (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Diana ShnaiderShnaider – Lin ZhuZhu (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Yuhan WangWang (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Ulrikke EikeriEikeri – Kaja JuvanJuvan (6-2 1-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Xinyu WangWang (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez – Hanyu GuoGuo (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Viktoria HruncakovaHruncakova (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nao HibinoHibino – Kimberly BirrellBirrell (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Amina AnshbaAnshba (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ulrikke EikeriEikeri – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiaodi YouYou – Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Valeria SavinykhSavinykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction