Tennys Sandgren and Ryan Peniston will play each other in the 2nd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 8:00 pm on Court 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ryan Peniston who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ryan Peniston is the pick to win this match.
Ryan Peniston -> 1.727
Tennys Sandgren -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tennys Sandgren vs. Ryan Peniston
This will be the 2nd time that Tennys Sandgren and Ryan Peniston fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Sandgren (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Sandgren won 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in USA F16.
Tennys Sandgren
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-9 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 20-19 | 0-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 19-11 | 1-5 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-24 | 5-12 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 7-5 | 5-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 197, Tennys got to the 2nd round after beating Illya Marchenko 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Sandgren had a good straight sets win against Marchenko (6-2 6-1). During the match, Sandgren scored 58 points vs Marchenko’s 33. Sandgren was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sandgren fired 6 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Tennys Sandgren was very effective on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Marchenko 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Sandgren has good match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (283-225). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Sandgren has an aggregate 48-40 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Sandgren’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Cleveland Challenger,the Bloomfield Hills Challenger and the Lexington Challenger.
The American has a composed 22-19 win-loss record in 2023, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Ryan Peniston
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-20 | 8-12 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-29 | 20-12 | 1-8 | 7-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-26 | 4-8 | 5-4 | 13-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-23 | 25-9 | 12-4 | 9-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-12 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 219, Ryan reached the 2nd round after beating Bernard Tomic 3-1 ret..
In the 1st round against Tomic, Peniston had a free pass after Tomic retired on a 3-1 . scoreline.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Winnipeg Challenger where he overcame Leandro Riedi in the final 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Ryan has a composed 21-22 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sandgren | Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 4 |
| Pts | 58-33 | 20-15 |
| Total Points | 91 | 35 |
| Winners | 27 | 3 |
| %Winners | 47% | 15% |
Both Sandgren and Peniston played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Sandgren and Peniston have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Sandgren played 11 games more than Peniston. Sandgren scored 27 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit scored 3 winners (15%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sandgren | Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 32/48 | 4/10 |
| %1st in | 67% | 40% |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 3/4 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 5/6 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 83% |
Sandgren scored 6 aces . Peniston fired 2 aces . Sandgren won 84% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Peniston won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 83% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sandgren | Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 1 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 1/2 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 0 |
| Saved | 5 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Sandgren broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Sandgren pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 5 break points. Peniston broke his opponent once with a 50% conversion rate. The Brit was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Sandgren | |||
| R1 Marchenko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 58-33 | 58-33 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/48 | 32/48 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 27/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 10/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Peniston | |||
| R1 Tomic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 1 | 1 | |
| Tot Games | 4 | 4 | |
| pts | 20-15 | 20-15 | |
| Total points | 35 | 35 | |
| Winners | 3 | 3 | |
| %Winners | 15% | 15% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| % 1st in | 40% | 40% | |
| 1st pts | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| % 2nd pts | 83% | 83% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/2 | 1/2 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWLW
LLWLLWLWLL Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Ethan QuinnQuinn (7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Aidan MayoMayo (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- James TracyTracy – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Bernard TomicTomic (3-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Jack AnthropAnthrop (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Ryan PenistonPeniston (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Aziz DougazDougaz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Denis KudlaKudla (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-1) – H2H and prediction
