Timo Stodder and Henri Squire will face off in the qualifications of the Szczecin Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 2:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Henri Squire who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Henri Squire is the pick to win this match.
Henri Squire -> 1.72
Timo Stodder -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Timo Stodder vs. Henri Squire
This will be the 2nd time that Timo Stodder and Henri Squire clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Squire (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Squire won 6-1 3-6 6-0 in the final in M25 Most back in May 2023.
Timo Stodder
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-34 | 0-1 | 40-31 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-15 | 4-4 | 29-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 273, Stodder got to the qualifications after defeating Adrian Andrzejczuk 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Andrzejczuk (6-1 6-0). During the match, Stodder scored 51 points vs Andrzejczuk’s 17. Stodder was quite aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Regarding the service games, Stodder fired 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Timo Stodder was exceptionally effective on serve to win 84% (16/19) of his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Stodder was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Andrzejczuk 5 times.
Stodder has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 68% of his matches (178-84). 31-22 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Stodder has an aggregate143-65 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
Stodder’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Most and M25 Marburg.
Timo has an overall 32-24 win-loss record in 2023, 31-22 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Henri Squire
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-31 | 1-3 | 21-13 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 278, the German got to the qualifications after defeating Jasza Szajrych 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Szajrych (6-3 6-4). During the match Squire scored 64 points vs Szajrych’s 49. Henri was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Squire blasted 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Henri Squire lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Squire put 60% of his first serves in, winning 82% (28/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (11/23) on the 2nd serve. The German was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Szajrych 4 times.
Squire’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Bath,M25 Montreal,M25 Prague and M25 Most.
Henri has a compiled 47-30 win-loss record in 2023, 25-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Henri has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stodder | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 19 |
| Pts | 51-17 | 64-49 |
| Total Points | 68 | 113 |
| Winners | 16 | 28 |
| %Winners | 31% | 44% |
Both Stodder and Squire played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Stodder and Squire have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Stodder played 6 games less than Squire. Timo scored 16 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The German bagged 28 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stodder | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 19/36 | 34/57 |
| %1st in | 53% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 16/19 | 28/34 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 11/23 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 48% |
Stodder managed to score 5 aces . Squire scored 4 aces . Stodder won 84% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Squire won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stodder | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/5 | 4/4 |
| % Converted | 100% | 100% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The German broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. Stodder pretty solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Squire broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stodder | |||
| Q1 Andrzejczuk |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 51-17 | 51-17 | |
| Total points | 68 | 68 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 19/36 | 19/36 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 16/19 | 16/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Squire | |||
| Q1 Szajrych |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 64-49 | 64-49 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 34/57 | 34/57 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 28/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/23 | 11/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWLWW
LWLWWLLWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Steven DiezDiez – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Vit KoprivaKopriva (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Pedro CachinCachin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – Miljan ZekicZekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Jozef KovalikKovalik (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Hugo GastonGaston (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Timo StodderStodder – Henri SquireSquire (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Pawel CiasCias (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
