Thiago Seyboth Wild and Rudolf Molleker will fight against each other in the quarter of the Como Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Thiago Seyboth Wild who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Thiago Seyboth Wild is the pick to win this match.
Thiago Seyboth Wild -> 1.42
Rudolf Molleker -> 2.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Thiago Seyboth Wild vs. Rudolf Molleker
There is no head to head record between Thiago Seyboth Wild and Rudolf Molleker since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 27-29 | 11-9 | 14-18 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 61-23 | 1-1 | 56-16 | 2-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 21-27 | 3-5 | 18-21 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 26-32 | 7-6 | 18-23 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-13 | 0-3 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 106 (career-high), Thiago reached the quarter after defeating Franco Agamenone 6-3 6-4 and Lukas Neumayer 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Thiago had a good straight sets win against Neumayer (6-3 6-4). During the match, Seyboth Wild scored 66 points vs Neumayer’s 50. Seyboth Wild was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Seyboth Wild scored 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Thiago Seyboth Wild was extremely efficient on serve to win 83% (24/29) of his 1st serve and 59% (19/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Seyboth Wild broke Neumayer 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Seyboth Wild hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to win 57% of the points he played.
Seyboth Wild has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (198-142). 48-16 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Seyboth Wild has a compiled176-115 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Vina del Mar Challenger where he defeated Hugo Gaston in the final 7-5 6-1 and the Buenos Aires Challenger where he overcame Luciano Darderi in the final 6-3 6-3.
The Brazilian has an overall 51-18 win-loss record in 2023, 48-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Como Challenger
The Brazilian has never competed in this tournament before.
Rudolf Molleker
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 28-29 | 4-6 | 15-17 | 7-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-35 | 2-3 | 42-25 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
2022 | 47-28 | 2-1 | 45-24 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 8-23 | 0-1 | 6-16 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-7 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 232, Rudolf got to the quarter after beating Flavio Cobolli 6-3 6-3 and Alessandro Giannessi 6-3 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Rudolf had a good straight sets win against Giannessi (6-3 6-1). During the match Molleker scored 68 points vs Giannessi’s 51. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Molleker scored 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Rudolf Molleker lost the serve once and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Molleker put 55% of his first serves in, winning 69% (25/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. Rudolf broke Giannessi 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Molleker hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Prague 3 Challenger where he beat Gabriel Debru in the final 6-2 6-2.
Molleker has a composed 46-25 win-loss record in 2023, 38-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Seyboth Wild | Molleker |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
Tot Games | 38 | 34 |
Pts | 127-97 | 126-96 |
Total Points | 224 | 222 |
Winners | 45 | 45 |
%Winners | 35% | 36% |
Both Seyboth Wild and Molleker played 2 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Seyboth Wild and Molleker have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Seyboth Wild played 4 games more than Molleker. Thiago scored 45 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Rudolf fired 45 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Seyboth Wild | Molleker |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 8 |
Avg per match | 2.5 | 4 |
1st in | 62/115 | 62/111 |
%1st in | 54% | 56% |
1st pts | 45/62 | 45/62 |
%1st pts | 73% | 73% |
2nd pts | 36/53 | 27/49 |
%2nd pts | 68% | 55% |
Seyboth Wild bagged 5 aces (2.5 per match). Molleker blasted 8 aces (4 per match). Seyboth Wild won 73% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Molleker won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Seyboth Wild | Molleker |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 9 |
Converted | 6/9 | 9/13 |
% Converted | 67% | 69% |
Conceded | 6 | 10 |
Saved | 4 | 8 |
% Saved | 67% | 80% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Thiago broke his opponents 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Seyboth Wild dropped his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Molleker broke his opponents 9 times with a 69% conversion rate. Molleker conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Seyboth Wild | ||||
R1 Agamenone |
R2 Neumayer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
pts | 61-47 | 66-50 | 127-97 | |
Total points | 108 | 116 | 224 | |
Winners | 21 | 24 | 45 | |
%Winners | 34% | 36% | 35% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 33/54 | 29/61 | 62/115 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 48% | 54% | |
1st pts | 21/33 | 24/29 | 45/62 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 83% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 17/21 | 19/32 | 36/53 | |
% 2nd pts | 81% | 59% | 68% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 3/4 | 6/9 | |
Converted % | 60% | 75% | 67% | |
Conceded | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 0% | 80% | 40% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Molleker | ||||
R1 Cobolli |
R2 Giannessi |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 16 | 34 | |
pts | 58-45 | 68-51 | 126-96 | |
Total points | 103 | 119 | 222 | |
Winners | 20 | 25 | 45 | |
%Winners | 34% | 37% | 36% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
1st in | 26/46 | 36/65 | 62/111 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 55% | 56% | |
1st pts | 20/26 | 25/36 | 45/62 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 69% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 13/20 | 14/29 | 27/49 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 48% | 55% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
Converted | 4/5 | 5/8 | 9/13 | |
Converted % | 80% | 63% | 69% | |
Conceded | 1 | 9 | 10 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 8/9 | 8 | |
Saved % | 0% | 89% | 45% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Como Challenger
- Zvonimir Babic/Alexander DonskiBabic/Alexander Donski – Ivan Liutarevich/Vladyslav ManafovLiutarevich/Vladyslav Manafov (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benoit PairePaire – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction