Jason Jung and Zhe Li will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Zhuhai Challenger for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Jung who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jason Jung is the pick to win this match.
Jason Jung -> 1.42
Zhe Li -> 2.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Jung vs. Zhe Li
This will be the 5th time that Jason Jung and Zhe Li play each other. The head to head is 3-1 for Jung (see full H2H stats), 2-1 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Jung won 3-6 6-1 6-4 in the quarter in the Gwangju Challenger back in 2019.
Jason Jung
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 256, Jason reached the semifinal after defeating Yan Bai 6-2 6-3, Fajing Sun 6-3 3-6 7-64 and Robert Strombachs 6-4 6-2.
In the quarter, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Strombachs (6-4 6-2). During the match, Jung scored 67 points vs Strombachs’s 45. Jung was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jung fired 3 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults. Jason Jung lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Jung put 66% of his first serves in, winning 85% (28/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve. Jung broke Strombachs 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Chinese has lost 1 set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Jung has good record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (314-258). 37-17 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jung has an aggregate 229-163 record in the last years on hard.
The Chinese’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Jakarta.
Jung has a composed 37-18 win-loss record in 2023, 37-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zhuhai Challenger
Zhe Li
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-13 | 26-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 22-14 | 22-13 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 709, the Chinese reached the semifinal after beating Mikalai Haliak 6-3 6-0, Hanwen Li 4-6 6-2 6-2 and Evgeny Karlovskiy 6-3 6-3.
In the quarter, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Karlovskiy (6-3 6-3). During the match Li scored 57 points vs Karlovskiy’s 42. Zhe was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Li recorded 6 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Zhe Li was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (23/28) of his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Chinese broke Karlovskiy 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Zhe has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
The Chinese’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Tianjin.
Zhe has an overall 17-5 win-loss record in 2023, 17-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Jung | Li |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 3 |
Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
Tot Games | 66 | 59 |
Pts | 231-184 | 205-143 |
Total Points | 415 | 348 |
Winners | 98 | 83 |
%Winners | 42% | 40% |
Both Jung and Li played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jason Jung dropped 1 set, while Zhe Li surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Jung and Li have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Jung played 7 games more than Li. Jason scored 98 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Li bagged 83 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Jung | Li |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 23 |
Avg per match | 1.7 | 7.7 |
1st in | 130/203 | 105/183 |
%1st in | 64% | 57% |
1st pts | 98/130 | 83/105 |
%1st pts | 75% | 79% |
2nd pts | 37/73 | 43/78 |
%2nd pts | 51% | 55% |
Jung recorded 5 aces (1.7 per match). Li made 23 aces (7.7 per match). Jung won 75% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Li won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Jung | Li |
---|---|---|
Won | 12 | 13 |
Converted | 12/24 | 13/20 |
% Converted | 50% | 65% |
Conceded | 18 | 14 |
Saved | 12 | 11 |
% Saved | 67% | 79% |
Times Broken | 6 | 3 |
The Chinese broke his opponents 12 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jung surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Li broke his opponents 13 times with a 65% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
Jung | |||||
R1 Bai |
R2 Sun |
1/4 Strombachs |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 3-6 7-64 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 31 | 18 | 66 | |
pts | 66-46 | 98-93 | 67-45 | 231-184 | |
Total points | 112 | 191 | 112 | 415 | |
Winners | 30 | 40 | 28 | 98 | |
%Winners | 45% | 41% | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | |
1st in | 39/60 | 58/93 | 33/50 | 130/203 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 62% | 66% | 64% | |
1st pts | 30/39 | 40/58 | 28/33 | 98/130 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 69% | 85% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 19/35 | 8/17 | 37/73 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 54% | 47% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/8 | 4/9 | 12/24 | |
Converted % | 57% | 50% | 44% | 50% | |
Conceded | 6 | 8 | 4 | 18 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 4/8 | 3/4 | 12 | |
Saved % | 83% | 50% | 75% | 69% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
Li | |||||
R1 Haliak |
R2 Li |
1/4 Karlovskiy |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-0 | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 26 | 18 | 59 | |
pts | 59-31 | 89-70 | 57-42 | 205-143 | |
Total points | 90 | 159 | 99 | 348 | |
Winners | 21 | 39 | 23 | 83 | |
%Winners | 36% | 44% | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 4 | 13 | 6 | 23 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 6 | 0 | 9 | |
1st in | 28/51 | 49/82 | 28/50 | 105/183 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 60% | 56% | 57% | |
1st pts | 21/28 | 39/49 | 23/28 | 83/105 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 80% | 82% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 13/23 | 16/33 | 14/22 | 43/78 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 48% | 64% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 3 | 13 | |
Converted | 5/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | |
Converted % | 100% | 50% | 60% | 65% | |
Conceded | 2 | 9 | 3 | 14 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 7/9 | 3/3 | 11 | |
Saved % | 50% | 78% | 100% | 76% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Zhuhai Challenger
- Zhe LiLi – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Toshihide Matsui/Kaito UesugiMatsui/Kaito Uesugi – Robert Strombachs/Evan ZhuStrombachs/Evan Zhu (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis – Yi ZhouZhou (6-1 7-68) – See score progression
- Arthur WeberWeber – Aliaksandr LiaonenkaLiaonenka (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Zhe LiLi – Jason JungJung (1-3) – H2H and prediction