Daniel Masur and Mats Moraing will square off in the qualifications of the Augsburg Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:30 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mats Moraing who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mats Moraing is the pick to win this match.
Mats Moraing -> 1.79
Daniel Masur -> 1.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Masur vs. Mats Moraing
This will be the 4th time that Daniel Masur and Mats Moraing face off. The head to head is 2-1 for Moraing (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they played, Masur won 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) in the 2nd round in the Quimper Challenger back in 2020.
Daniel Masur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-24 | 1-2 | 11-10 | 19-9 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 416, Daniel reached the qualifications after defeating Constantin Frantzen 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Masur had a good straight sets win against Frantzen (6-3 6-4). During the match, Masur scored 66 points vs Frantzen’s 52. Daniel was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Masur managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniel Masur was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 83% (25/30) of his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Frantzen twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Masur has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (333-252). 6-5 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Masur has an overall 124-94 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Masur’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Nussloch and M15 Oberhaching.
The German has an aggregate 25-17 win-loss record in 2023, 6-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Augsburg Challenger
Daniel has never competed in this tournament before.
Mats Moraing
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 14-16 | 5-8 | 6-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-26 | 4-6 | 6-11 | 6-4 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 31-22 | 2-2 | 21-14 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-10 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 25-25 | 10-7 | 10-11 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 587, the German reached the qualifications after defeating Federico Iannaccone 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Moraing had a good straight sets win against Iannaccone (6-4 6-2). During the match Moraing scored 71 points vs Iannaccone’s 56. Moraing was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Moraing recorded 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Mats Moraing was very efficient on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 53% (17/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The German broke Iannaccone 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Mats has a composed 10-10 win-loss record in 2023, 5-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Masur | Moraing |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 18 |
| Pts | 66-52 | 71-56 |
| Total Points | 118 | 127 |
| Winners | 25 | 21 |
| %Winners | 38% | 30% |
Both Masur and Moraing played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Masur and Moraing have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Masur played 1 game more than Moraing. Daniel scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Moraing fired 21 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Masur | Moraing |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 30/52 | 26/58 |
| %1st in | 58% | 45% |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 21/26 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 17/32 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 53% |
Masur managed to score 2 aces . Moraing struck 4 aces . Masur won 83% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Moraing won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Masur | Moraing |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/10 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 20% | 40% |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Masur broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. Masur extremely effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Moraing broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Moraing conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Masur | |||
| Q1 Frantzen |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 66-52 | 66-52 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 30/52 | 30/52 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 15/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Moraing | |||
| Q1 Iannaccone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 71-56 | 71-56 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 26/58 | 26/58 | |
| % 1st in | 45% | 45% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/32 | 17/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLLLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Lucas GerchGerch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Mats MoraingMoraing (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Nicola KuhnKuhn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Manuel GuinardGuinard (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hendrik JebensJebens – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – Matteo MartineauMartineau (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Timo StodderStodder – Max HoukesHoukes (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Louis WesselsWessels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
