Kimmer Coppejans and Dino Prizmic will face off in the final of the Banja Luka Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 8:15 pm on CENTRAL COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dino Prizmic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dino Prizmic is the pick to win this match.
Dino Prizmic -> 1.49
Kimmer Coppejans -> 2.53
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kimmer Coppejans vs. Dino Prizmic
There is no head to head record between Kimmer Coppejans and Dino Prizmic since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Kimmer Coppejans
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-6 | 22-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 14-17 | 6-5 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 160, Coppejans reached the final after beating Mirza Basic 6-3 6-4, Nino Serdarusic 6-77 6-3 7-5, Norbert Gombos 3-5 ret. and Marko Topo 6-0 6-1.
In the semifinal, Kimmer had a good straight sets win against Topo (6-0 6-1). During the match, Coppejans scored 59 points vs Topo’s 29. Coppejans was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Coppejans blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 83% (19/23) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Coppejans broke Topo 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Belgian has dropped 1 set in this competition to win 57% of the points he played.
Coppejans has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (349-268). 24-18 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Coppejans has a compiled 256-173 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Belgian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Sanremo Challenger and the Banja Luka Challenger.
Coppejans has a composed 28-24 win-loss record in 2023, 24-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Banja Luka Challenger
Dino Prizmic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-17 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 8-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-19 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-9 | 21-1 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 241 (career-high), Prizmic got to the final after beating Akira Santillan 2-6 6-3 5-3 ret., Alex Molcan 6-1 6-4, Damir Dzumhur 6-3 6-4 and Fabian Marozsan w/o.
In the semifinal, Dino defeated Marozsan (w/o). During the match Prizmic and Marozsan scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 160 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Prizmic was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
About the serving games, Prizmic couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Dino Prizmic conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Dino hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
The Croatian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Porec.
The Croatian has a composed 30-11 win-loss record in 2023, 22-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Banja Luka Challenger
Prizmic has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Coppejans | Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 74 | 61 |
| Pts | 259-203 | 251-211 |
| Total Points | 462 | 462 |
| Winners | 105 | 79 |
| %Winners | 41% | 31% |
Coppejans played 4 matches while Prizmic competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Kimmer Coppejans dropped 2 sets, while Dino Prizmic conceded 1 set. Coppejans has played 1 set more than Prizmic (9 vs 8). Therefore, Coppejans played 13 games more than Prizmic. Kimmer scored 105 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Dino blasted 79 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Coppejans | Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 23 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 5.8 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 132/234 | 125/212 |
| %1st in | 56% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 105/132 | 79/125 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 58/102 | 47/87 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 54% |
Coppejans blasted 23 aces (5.8 per match). Prizmic bagged 7 aces (2.3 per match). Coppejans won 80% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Prizmic won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Coppejans | Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 14 |
| Converted | 12/19 | 14/41 |
| % Converted | 63% | 34% |
| Conceded | 23 | 16 |
| Saved | 20 | 7 |
| % Saved | 87% | 44% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 9 |
Coppejans broke his opponents 12 times with a 63% conversion rate. Coppejans dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 87% of the break points that he conceded. Dino broke his opponents 14 times with a 34% conversion rate. The Croatian conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 44% of the break points that he conceded.
| Coppejans | ||||||
| R1 Basic |
R2 Serdarusic |
1/4 Gombos |
1/2 Topo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-77 6-3 7-5 | 3-5 ret. | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 34 | 8 | 13 | 74 | |
| pts | 60-50 | 112-94 | 28-30 | 59-29 | 259-203 | |
| Total points | 110 | 206 | 58 | 88 | 462 | |
| Winners | 29 | 48 | 9 | 19 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 43% | 32% | 32% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 4 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 38/68 | 55/101 | 16/27 | 23/38 | 132/234 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 54% | 59% | 61% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 29/38 | 48/55 | 9/16 | 19/23 | 105/132 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 87% | 56% | 83% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/30 | 26/46 | 5/11 | 9/15 | 58/102 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 57% | 45% | 60% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 12 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 3/6 | 1/2 | 6/8 | 12/19 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 50% | 50% | 75% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 23 | |
| Saved | 9/9 | 6/7 | 2/4 | 3/3 | 20 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 86% | 50% | 100% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| Prizmic | ||||||
| R1 Santillan |
R2 Molcan |
1/4 Dzumhur |
1/2 Marozsan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-3 5-3 ret. | 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | – | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 17 | 19 | – | 61 | |
| pts | 106-99 | 74-54 | 71-58 | – | 251-211 | |
| Total points | 205 | 128 | 129 | – | 462 | |
| Winners | 38 | 19 | 22 | – | 79 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 26% | 31% | – | 31% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 4 | 1 | 2 | – | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 2 | 1 | – | 8 | |
| 1st in | 62/92 | 26/55 | 37/65 | – | 125/212 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 47% | 57% | – | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 38/62 | 19/26 | 22/37 | – | 79/125 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 73% | 59% | – | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/30 | 18/29 | 16/28 | – | 47/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 62% | 57% | – | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 5 | – | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/17 | 4/15 | 5/9 | – | 14/41 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 27% | 56% | – | 34% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 2 | 6 | – | 16 | |
| Saved | 3/8 | 1/2 | 3/6 | – | 7 | |
| Saved % | 38% | 50% | 50% | – | 35% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 | 3 | – | 9 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
LLWWWLLWWW 
