Camila Giorgi and Elizabeth Mandlik will play each other in the 2nd round of the Rothesay Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on Court 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Camila Giorgi who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Camila Giorgi is the pick to win this match.
Camila Giorgi -> 1.34
Elizabeth Mandlik -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Camila Giorgi vs. Elizabeth Mandlik
There is no head to head record between Camila Giorgi and Elizabeth Mandlik since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Camila Giorgi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-6 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-18 | 14-9 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-16 | 7-6 | 3-4 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-17 | 14-9 | 3-4 | 2-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 8-6 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 47, Giorgi reached the 2nd round after beating Madison Brengle 7-65 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Brengle (7-65 6-2). During the match, Giorgi scored 71 points vs Brengle’s 61. The Italian was pretty aggressive to blast 15 winners.
Regarding the service games, Giorgi fired 2 aces and she committed only 8 double faults. Camila Giorgi lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Giorgi put 44% of her first serves in, winning 54% (15/28) of the points behind her 1st serve and 53% (19/36) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Brengle 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Giorgi has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of her matches (232-180). 1-0 on grass in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Giorgi has a composed 40-24 match record in the last years on grass.
Her best result of the season was winning the title in Merida where she beat Rebecca Peterson in the final 7-6(3) 1-6 6-2.
The Italian has a compiled 15-10 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Elizabeth Mandlik
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-27 | 15-14 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-33 | 15-17 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-24 | 26-12 | 10-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-22 | 24-13 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 110 (career-high), Mandlik got to the 2nd round after defeating Iryna Shymanovich 6-4 6-4, Daria Snigur 6-2 2-6 7-5 and Viktoriya Tomova 6-2 3-6 7-65.
In the 1st round, The American defeated Tomova (6-2 3-6 7-65). During the match Mandlik scored 90 points vs Tomova’s 87. Mandlik was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Mandlik struck 2 aces and she was not very steady on her 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Elizabeth Mandlik lost the serve 7 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Mandlik put 56% of her first serves in, winning 52% (27/52) of the points behind her 1st serve and 49% (20/41) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Tomova 7 times after converting 78% of her break points (7/9).
Elizabeth’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Reus.
The American has an aggregate 19-17 win-loss record in 2023, 4-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Elizabeth has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Giorgi | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 78 |
| Pts | 71-61 | 248-236 |
| Total Points | 132 | 484 |
| Winners | 15 | 89 |
| %Winners | 21% | 36% |
Giorgi played 1 match while Mandlik competed in 3 matches. Mandlik started her run from the qualifications while Giorgi had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Elizabeth Mandlik dropped 2 sets while Camila Giorgi hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Giorgi has played 6 set(s) less than Mandlik (2 vs 8). Therefore, Giorgi played 57 games less than Mandlik. The Italian scored 15 winners (21% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 89 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Giorgi | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 28/64 | 142/246 |
| %1st in | 44% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 15/28 | 89/142 |
| %1st pts | 54% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 53/104 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 51% |
Giorgi scored 2 aces . Mandlik made 9 aces (3 per match). Giorgi won 54% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Mandlik won 63% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Giorgi | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 15 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 15/25 |
| % Converted | 63% | 60% |
| Conceded | 6 | 19 |
| Saved | 3 | 7 |
| % Saved | 50% | 37% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 12 |
The Italian broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Italian conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Elizabeth broke her opponents 15 times with a 60% conversion rate. Elizabeth conceded her serve 12 times and she saved 37% of the break points that she conceded.
| Giorgi | |||
| R1 Brengle |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 71-61 | 71-61 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 21% | 21% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 28/64 | 28/64 | |
| % 1st in | 44% | 44% | |
| 1st pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 54% | 54% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 19/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Mandlik | |||||
| Q1 Shymanovich |
Q3 Snigur |
R1 Tomova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | 6-2 3-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 28 | 30 | 78 | |
| pts | 66-58 | 92-91 | 90-87 | 248-236 | |
| Total points | 124 | 183 | 177 | 484 | |
| Winners | 22 | 40 | 27 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 43% | 30% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 11 | 17 | |
| 1st in | 33/65 | 57/88 | 52/93 | 142/246 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 65% | 56% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 22/33 | 40/57 | 27/52 | 89/142 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 70% | 52% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 15/31 | 20/41 | 53/104 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 48% | 49% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 7 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/9 | 7/9 | 15/25 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 44% | 78% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 | 10 | 19 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 3/6 | 3/10 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 50% | 30% | 113% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLLLW
LLLWWLLWWL Tennis Scores in Nottingham
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Donna VekicVekic (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Heather WatsonWatson – Tatjana MariaMaria (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alize CornetCornet – Maria SakkariSakkari (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Lin ZhuZhu (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Thomas Yaka Kofi SetodjiYaka Kofi Setodji (6-4 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit – Eros SiringoSiringo (6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jules OkalaOkala – Darko BojanovicBojanovic (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel PetitPetit – Francois-Arthur VibertVibert (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Theo FournerieFournerie – Tak Khunn WangKhunn Wang (6-3 2-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Davide GaloppiniGaloppini – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Harriet DartDart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie BoulterBoulter – Daria SnigurSnigur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
