Facundo Bagnis and Jakub Mensik will play each other in the 2nd round of the Prostejov Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:30 am on PROSTEJOV ARENA. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Mensik who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jakub Mensik is the pick to win this match.
Jakub Mensik -> 1.71
Facundo Bagnis -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Facundo Bagnis vs. Jakub Mensik
There is no head to head record between Facundo Bagnis and Jakub Mensik since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Facundo Bagnis
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 30-15 | 1-3 | 29-11 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-27 | 4-6 | 23-20 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 46-29 | 9-9 | 37-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-23 | 2-5 | 35-16 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 25-14 | 1-2 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 124, the Argentine got to the 2nd round after beating Michael Geerts 6-1 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Geerts (6-1 7-5). During the match, Bagnis scored 74 points vs Geerts’s 54. Facundo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Bagnis made 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Facundo Bagnis was extremely efficient on serve to win 87% (33/38) of his 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Argentine broke Geerts 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Bagnis has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (363-240). 10-10 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Bagnis has an overall 334-194 record in the last years on clay.
The Argentine has an aggregate 13-15 win-loss record in 2023, 10-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prostejov Challenger
Jakub Mensik
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 34-21 | 24-11 | 6-4 | 2-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-23 | 10-6 | 17-11 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 37-16 | 18-4 | 17-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2021 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 240, the Czech got to the 2nd round after beating Nicholas David Ionel 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Czech had a good straight sets win against David Ionel (6-2 6-3). During the match Mensik scored 66 points vs David Ionel’s 42. Mensik was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Mensik blasted 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jakub Mensik lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Mensik put 50% of his first serves in, winning 74% (20/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (12/27) on the 2nd serve. Jakub broke David Ionel 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Prague 2 Challenger where he overcame Dominik Koepfer in the final 6-4 6-3.
The Czech has a composed 20-9 win-loss record in 2023, 9-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Bagnis | Mensik |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 17 |
Pts | 74-54 | 66-42 |
Total Points | 128 | 108 |
Winners | 33 | 20 |
%Winners | 45% | 30% |
Both Bagnis and Mensik played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Bagnis and Mensik have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Bagnis played 2 games more than Mensik. Bagnis scored 33 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Mensik made 20 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Bagnis | Mensik |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 5 |
Avg per match | 7 | 5 |
1st in | 38/52 | 27/54 |
%1st in | 73% | 50% |
1st pts | 33/38 | 20/27 |
%1st pts | 87% | 74% |
2nd pts | 8/14 | 12/27 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 44% |
Bagnis bagged 7 aces . Mensik fired 5 aces . Bagnis won 87% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Mensik won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Bagnis | Mensik |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 7 |
Converted | 3/11 | 7/12 |
% Converted | 27% | 58% |
Conceded | 0 | 9 |
Saved | 0 | 5 |
% Saved | 0% | 56% |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Bagnis broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Facundo quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Mensik broke his opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Mensik conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
Bagnis | |||
R1 Geerts |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 74-54 | 74-54 | |
Total points | 128 | 128 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 38/52 | 38/52 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
1st pts | 33/38 | 33/38 | |
% 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Mensik | |||
R1 David |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 66-42 | 66-42 | |
Total points | 108 | 108 | |
Winners | 20 | 20 | |
%Winners | 30% | 30% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 27/54 | 27/54 | |
% 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
1st pts | 20/27 | 20/27 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 12/27 | 12/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Prostejov Challenger
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Jelle SelsSels – Mariano NavoneNavone (6-3 6-72 6-3) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Petr Nouza/Andrew PaulsonNouza/Andrew Paulson – Roman Jebavy/Luis David MartinezJebavy/Luis David Martinez (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Hynek BartonBarton – Flavio CobolliCobolli (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Andrea CollariniCollarini (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Dennis NovakNovak (6-4 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Nick HardtHardt (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Federico CoriaCoria (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Lukas PokornyPokorny (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Zdenek KolarKolar (7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Luciano DarderiDarderi (5-7 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Nick HardtHardt (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Hynek BartonBarton – Flavio CobolliCobolli (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Andrea CollariniCollarini (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Jelle SelsSels (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Zsombor PirosPiros (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction