![Prediction And Head To Head Maks Kasnikowski Vs. Omni Kumar Vptjc87v3g Prediction and head to head Maks Kasnikowski vs. Omni Kumar](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Maks-Kasnikowski-vs.-Omni-Kumar-vptjc87v3g.jpg)
Maks Kasnikowski and Omni Kumar will face off in the qualifications of the Little Rock Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 13. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maks Kasnikowski who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Maks Kasnikowski is the pick to win this match.
Maks Kasnikowski -> 1.41
Omni Kumar -> 2.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Maks Kasnikowski vs. Omni Kumar
There is no head to head record between Maks Kasnikowski and Omni Kumar since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Maks Kasnikowski
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-17 | 3-4 | 20-10 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-25 | 13-6 | 22-14 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 44-19 | 16-7 | 20-10 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-11 | 7-5 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 319, the Pole got to the qualifications after defeating Jose Statham 6-3 6-76 6-4.
In the qualifications, Kasnikowski defeated Statham (6-3 6-76 6-4). During the match, Kasnikowski scored 104 points vs Statham’s 89. The Pole was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kasnikowski bagged 14 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Maks Kasnikowski was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 77% (40/52) of his 1st serve and 55% (23/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kasnikowski was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Statham 4 times.
Kasnikowski has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 67% of his matches (79-39). 9-2 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kasnikowski has an aggregate32-14 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
The Pole’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Kursumlijska Banja.
Maks has a composed 23-8 win-loss record in 2023, 9-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Kasnikowski has never competed in this tournament before.
Omni Kumar
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-9 | 8-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 54-32 | 54-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 49-36 | 47-29 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 75-29 | 73-27 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-10 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 399, the American reached the qualifications after beating Mateus Alves 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Alves (6-4 6-4). During the match Kumar scored 64 points vs Alves’s 51. The American was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Kumar blasted 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Omni Kumar lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Kumar put 44% of his first serves in, winning 81% (21/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (16/33) on the 2nd serve. Omni was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Alves 4 times.
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
Kumar has an aggregate 25-14 win-loss record in 2023, 25-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kasnikowski | Kumar |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 32 | 20 |
Pts | 104-89 | 64-51 |
Total Points | 193 | 115 |
Winners | 40 | 21 |
%Winners | 38% | 33% |
Both Kasnikowski and Kumar played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Maks Kasnikowski dropped 1 set while Omni Kumar hasn’t lost a set so far. Kasnikowski has played 1 set more than Kumar (3 vs 2). Therefore, Kasnikowski played 12 games more than Kumar. The Pole scored 40 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Kumar blasted 21 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kasnikowski | Kumar |
---|---|---|
Aces | 14 | 4 |
Avg per match | 14 | 4 |
1st in | 52/94 | 26/59 |
%1st in | 55% | 44% |
1st pts | 40/52 | 21/26 |
%1st pts | 77% | 81% |
2nd pts | 23/42 | 16/33 |
%2nd pts | 55% | 48% |
Kasnikowski managed to score 14 aces . Kumar recorded 4 aces . Kasnikowski won 77% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Kumar won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kasnikowski | Kumar |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 4 |
Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 |
% Converted | 100% | 100% |
Conceded | 5 | 3 |
Saved | 4 | 1 |
% Saved | 80% | 33% |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Maks broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Kasnikowski dropped his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Omni conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
Kasnikowski | |||
Q1 Statham |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-76 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
pts | 104-89 | 104-89 | |
Total points | 193 | 193 | |
Winners | 40 | 40 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 14 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 52/94 | 52/94 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
1st pts | 40/52 | 40/52 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 23/42 | 23/42 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Kumar | |||
Q1 Alves |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 64-51 | 64-51 | |
Total points | 115 | 115 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 26/59 | 26/59 | |
% 1st in | 44% | 44% | |
1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 16/33 | 16/33 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Aziz DougazDougaz (3-5) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Colin MarkesMarkes (0-0) – H2H and prediction