Dominik Koepfer and Jakub Mensik will fight against each other in the final of the Prague 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dominik Koepfer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dominik Koepfer is the pick to win this match.
Dominik Koepfer -> 1.61
Jakub Mensik -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dominik Koepfer vs. Jakub Mensik
There is no head to head record between Dominik Koepfer and Jakub Mensik since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Dominik Koepfer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-19 | 10-6 | 6-9 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-19 | 7-6 | 24-5 | 6-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-14 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-30 | 10-12 | 10-9 | 5-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 3-4 | 8-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 149, Koepfer reached the final after defeating Gastao Elias 1-1 ret., Evan Furness 7-66 ret., Lukas Klein 6-4 6-76 6-1 and Nicolas Kicker 6-4 6-3.
In the semifinal, The German had a good straight sets win against Kicker (6-4 6-3). During the match, Koepfer scored 73 points vs Kicker’s 57. The German was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Koepfer made 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Dominik Koepfer lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Koepfer put 71% of his first serves in, winning 56% (31/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (9/23) on the 2nd serve. Koepfer broke Kicker 7 times after converting 64% of his break points (7/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German has dropped 1 set in this competition to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Koepfer has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (252-166). 17-3 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Koepfer has an overall66-41 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Mexico City Challenger where he beat Thiago Agustin Tirante in the final 2-6 6-4 6-2.
The German has an aggregate 17-6 win-loss record in 2023, 17-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Jakub Mensik
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-24 | 26-12 | 6-4 | 7-3 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-23 | 10-6 | 17-11 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-16 | 18-4 | 17-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 333 (career-high), Mensik got to the final after beating Radu Albot 7-64 4-6 6-3, Vitaliy Sachko 6-4 6-4, Akira Santillan 3-6 6-3 7-66 and Alejandro Moro Canas 6-2 7-5.
In the semifinal, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Moro Canas (6-2 7-5). During the match Mensik scored 66 points vs Moro Canas’s 45. The Czech was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Mensik scored 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Jakub Mensik was extremely effective on serve to win 88% (21/24) of his 1st serve and 68% (17/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Czech broke Moro Canas 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mensik has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Mensik’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Trnava.
Jakub has an overall 16-8 win-loss record in 2023, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Koepfer | Mensik |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 64 | 103 |
| Pts | 240-199 | 343-311 |
| Total Points | 439 | 654 |
| Winners | 105 | 144 |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% |
Both Koepfer and Mensik played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Dominik Koepfer dropped 1 set, while Jakub Mensik dropped 2 sets. Koepfer has played 1 set(s) less than Mensik (9 vs 10). Therefore, Koepfer played 39 games less than Mensik. Koepfer scored 105 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Jakub managed to score 144 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Koepfer | Mensik |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 3.8 | 5.8 |
| 1st in | 156/235 | 191/335 |
| %1st in | 66% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 105/156 | 144/191 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 35/79 | 76/144 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 53% |
Koepfer scored 15 aces (3.8 per match). Mensik fired 23 aces (5.8 per match). Koepfer won 67% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Mensik won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Koepfer | Mensik |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 13 |
| Converted | 14/32 | 13/34 |
| % Converted | 44% | 38% |
| Conceded | 28 | 31 |
| Saved | 19 | 23 |
| % Saved | 68% | 74% |
| Times Broken | 9 | 8 |
Koepfer broke his opponents 14 times with a 44% conversion rate. Koepfer conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded. Jakub broke his opponents 13 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 74% of the break points that he conceded.
| Koepfer | ||||||
| R1 Elias |
R2 Furness |
1/4 Klein |
1/2 Kicker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-1 ret. | 7-66 ret. | 6-4 6-76 6-1 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 2 | 13 | 30 | 19 | 64 | |
| pts | 8-6 | 52-51 | 107-85 | 73-57 | 240-199 | |
| Total points | 14 | 103 | 192 | 130 | 439 | |
| Winners | 3 | 23 | 48 | 31 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 44% | 45% | 42% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 3/6 | 35/56 | 63/95 | 55/78 | 156/235 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 63% | 66% | 71% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 3/3 | 23/35 | 48/63 | 31/55 | 105/156 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 66% | 76% | 56% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 2/3 | 9/21 | 15/32 | 9/23 | 35/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 43% | 47% | 39% | 44% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 14 | |
| Converted | 0/2 | 2/6 | 5/13 | 7/11 | 14/32 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 33% | 38% | 64% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 28 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 6/8 | 6/8 | 7/12 | 19 | |
| Saved % | – | 75% | 75% | 58% | 52% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | |
| Mensik | ||||||
| R1 Albot |
R2 Sachko |
1/4 Santillan |
1/2 Moro |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 4-6 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | 3-6 6-3 7-66 | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 20 | 31 | 20 | 103 | |
| pts | 107-104 | 70-56 | 100-106 | 66-45 | 343-311 | |
| Total points | 211 | 126 | 206 | 111 | 654 | |
| Winners | 51 | 24 | 48 | 21 | 144 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 34% | 48% | 32% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 10 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 70/124 | 31/56 | 66/106 | 24/49 | 191/335 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 55% | 62% | 49% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 51/70 | 24/31 | 48/66 | 21/24 | 144/191 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 77% | 73% | 88% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/54 | 16/25 | 16/40 | 17/25 | 76/144 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 64% | 40% | 68% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 3/11 | 4/11 | 4/8 | 13/34 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 27% | 36% | 50% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 31 | |
| Saved | 12/14 | 3/4 | 8/12 | 0/1 | 23 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 75% | 67% | 0% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLLWLW
LWLWWWWLWW 
