![Prediction And Head To Head Magdalena Frech Vs. Polina Kudermetova Iwdfnedati Prediction and head to head Magdalena Frech vs. Polina Kudermetova](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Magdalena-Frech-vs.-Polina-Kudermetova-IwDFNedaTi.jpg)
Magdalena Frech and Polina Kudermetova will play each other in the qualifications of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Magdalena Frech who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Magdalena Frech is the pick to win this match.
Magdalena Frech -> 1.4
Polina Kudermetova -> 2.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Magdalena Frech vs. Polina Kudermetova
This will be the 2nd time that Magdalena Frech and Polina Kudermetova square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Frech (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they played, Frech won 6-1 6-3 in the qualifications in St. Petersburg back in 2021.
Magdalena Frech
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-22 | 12-8 | 10-9 | 1-1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-32 | 23-21 | 10-5 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-38 | 22-19 | 11-12 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-19 | 12-5 | 16-8 | 6-3 | 3-2 | 1-1 |
2020 | 26-14 | 12-5 | 10-7 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 94, the Pole reached the qualifications after defeating Federica Urgesi 7-69 6-0.
In the qualifications, Magdalena had a good straight sets win against Urgesi (7-69 6-0). During the match, Frech scored 82 points vs Urgesi’s 58. Magdalena was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Frech scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and she committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Magdalena Frech was exceptionally effective on serve to win 73% (32/44) of her 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Magdalena broke Urgesi 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Frech has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 60% of her matches (308-209). 7-3 on clay in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Frech has a composed121-74 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
Magdalena has an overall 14-14 win-loss record in 2023, 7-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Frech has never competed in this tournament before.
Polina Kudermetova
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 26-20 | 13-5 | 10-9 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2023 | 33-26 | 5-5 | 13-13 | 10-5 | 3-2 | 2-1 |
2022 | 54-19 | 30-14 | 8-3 | 16-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-13 | 3-2 | 9-7 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-4 | 2-2 | 7-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 142, the Russian reached the qualifications after defeating Katherine Sebov 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Kudermetova had a good straight sets win against Sebov (6-4 6-3). During the match Kudermetova scored 65 points vs Sebov’s 54. The Russian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Kudermetova recorded 3 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Polina Kudermetova lost the serve twice and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Kudermetova put 56% of her first serves in, winning 85% (29/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 33% (9/27) on the 2nd serve. Polina broke Sebov 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Her best result of the current year was conquering the title the W40 Astana where she defeated Darya Astakhova in the final 6-2 6-3.
Polina has a compiled 14-6 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Frech | Kudermetova |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 |
Pts | 82-58 | 65-54 |
Total Points | 140 | 119 |
Winners | 32 | 29 |
%Winners | 39% | 45% |
Both Frech and Kudermetova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Frech and Kudermetova have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (19). The Pole scored 32 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Russian managed to score 29 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Frech | Kudermetova |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 3 |
Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
1st in | 44/63 | 34/61 |
%1st in | 70% | 56% |
1st pts | 32/44 | 29/34 |
%1st pts | 73% | 85% |
2nd pts | 11/19 | 9/27 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 33% |
Frech bagged 1 ace . Kudermetova also scored 3 aces . Frech won 73% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Kudermetova won 85% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 33% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Frech | Kudermetova |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 4 |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 |
% Converted | 57% | 57% |
Conceded | 1 | 4 |
Saved | 0 | 2 |
% Saved | 0% | 50% |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Magdalena broke her opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Frech dropped her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded. The Russian broke her opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Polina conceded her serve twice and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
Frech | |||
Q1 Urgesi |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-69 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 82-58 | 82-58 | |
Total points | 140 | 140 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 44/63 | 44/63 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
1st pts | 32/44 | 32/44 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 11/19 | 11/19 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Kudermetova | |||
Q1 Sebov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 65-54 | 65-54 | |
Total points | 119 | 119 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 34/61 | 34/61 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 29/34 | 29/34 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 9/27 | 9/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Rome
- Alessandro RagazziRagazzi – Corrado SummariaSummaria (6-4 2-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andres Gabriel CiurlettiGabriel Ciurletti – Daniele SpinnatoSpinnato (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Francesco LiucciLiucci – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (6-0 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Aliona BolsovaBolsova (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebeka MasarovaMasarova – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure – Priscilla HonHon (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BondarBondar – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Taylor TownsendTownsend (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Ana KonjuhKonjuh (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Elsa JacquemotJacquemot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova – Sara ErraniErrani (5-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Elina SvitolinaSvitolina (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Anett KontaveitKontaveit (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Barbora StrycovaStrycova – Maryna ZanevskaZanevska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaia KanepiKanepi – Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilla RosatelloRosatello – Claire LiuLiu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – Danka KovinicKovinic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria BrancaccioBrancaccio – Julia GrabherGrabher (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Diletta CherubiniCherubini – Lisa PigatoPigato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Dalila SpiteriSpiteri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Lauren DavisDavis (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sofia KeninKenin – Cristina BucsaBucsa (0-0) – H2H and prediction