Dane Sweeny and Oleg Prihodko will square off in the qualifications of the Split Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dane Sweeny who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dane Sweeny is the pick to win this match.
Dane Sweeny -> 1.85
Oleg Prihodko -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dane Sweeny vs. Oleg Prihodko
There is no head to head record between Dane Sweeny and Oleg Prihodko since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Dane Sweeny
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-19 | 15-13 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 35-33 | 25-23 | 10-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 62-26 | 59-22 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-23 | 19-15 | 1-1 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2020 | 5-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 242, the Australian got to the qualifications after defeating Josip Simundza 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Sweeny had a good straight sets win against Simundza (6-3 6-3). During the match, Sweeny scored 70 points vs Simundza’s 55. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sweeny blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Dane Sweeny conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Sweeny put 61% of his first serves in, winning 65% (24/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 75% (18/24) on the 2nd serve. Dane broke Simundza 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Sweeny has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 61% of his matches (126-82). 8-2 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Sweeny has an aggregate15-14 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
Dane’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Canberra.
Dane has an aggregate 17-9 win-loss record in 2023, 8-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Split Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Oleg Prihodko
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 52-13 | 8-4 | 44-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-27 | 8-4 | 18-21 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 45-32 | 2-3 | 43-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 43-33 | 4-3 | 39-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 465, Oleg reached the qualifications after beating James McCabe 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against McCabe (6-3 6-3). During the match Prihodko scored 67 points vs McCabe’s 49. The Ukrainian was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Prihodko recorded 4 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Oleg Prihodko lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Prihodko put 69% of his first serves in, winning 68% (25/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the 2nd serve. The Ukrainian broke McCabe 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
Oleg has a composed 9-8 win-loss record in 2023, 9-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Sweeny | Prihodko |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 |
Pts | 70-55 | 67-49 |
Total Points | 125 | 116 |
Winners | 24 | 25 |
%Winners | 34% | 37% |
Both Sweeny and Prihodko played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Sweeny and Prihodko have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (18). The Australian scored 24 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Prihodko scored 25 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Sweeny | Prihodko |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 4 |
Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
1st in | 37/61 | 37/54 |
%1st in | 61% | 69% |
1st pts | 24/37 | 25/37 |
%1st pts | 65% | 68% |
2nd pts | 18/24 | 10/17 |
%2nd pts | 75% | 59% |
Sweeny struck 2 aces . Prihodko made 4 aces . Sweeny won 65% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Prihodko won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Sweeny | Prihodko |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 5 |
Converted | 3/9 | 5/15 |
% Converted | 33% | 33% |
Conceded | 5 | 8 |
Saved | 5 | 6 |
% Saved | 100% | 75% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Sweeny was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 5 break points. The Ukrainian broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Ukrainian conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Sweeny | |||
Q1 Simundza |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 70-55 | 70-55 | |
Total points | 125 | 125 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 37/61 | 37/61 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 24/37 | 24/37 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Prihodko | |||
Q1 McCabe |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 67-49 | 67-49 | |
Total points | 116 | 116 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 37/54 | 37/54 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 25/37 | 25/37 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Jeremy JahnJahn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Alexandar LazarovLazarov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction