Daniel Cukierman and Mohamed Safwat will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Biel Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Cukierman who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Cukierman is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Cukierman -> 1.66
Mohamed Safwat -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Cukierman vs. Mohamed Safwat
There is no head to head record between Daniel Cukierman and Mohamed Safwat since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Daniel Cukierman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-17 | 5-5 | 16-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 17-11 | 6-5 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 39-14 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 3-4 | 20-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-7 | 9-6 | 1-0 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 377, Cukierman got to the qualifications after beating Adrien Berrut 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Cukierman had a good straight sets win against Berrut (6-1 6-3). During the match, Cukierman scored 67 points vs Berrut’s 47. Daniel was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cukierman scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Daniel Cukierman was pretty effective on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Daniel broke Berrut 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Cukierman has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 62% of his matches (166-100). 5-5 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cukierman has a composed17-15 match record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The Israeli has an aggregate 5-7 win-loss record in 2023, 5-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biel Challenger
The Israeli has never competed in this tournament before.
Mohamed Safwat
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-21 | 14-5 | 15-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 61-28 | 36-10 | 24-16 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-24 | 2-6 | 22-15 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-24 | 1-2 | 5-14 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-16 | 11-9 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 613, the Egyptian got to the qualifications after beating Gabriele Moghini 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Egyptian had a good straight sets win against Moghini (6-2 6-2). During the match Safwat scored 62 points vs Moghini’s 42. Safwat was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Safwat made 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mohamed Safwat was very effective on serve to win 77% (20/26) of his 1st serve and 67% (16/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mohamed broke Moghini 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Safwat’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh.
Mohamed has a composed 14-7 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cukierman | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 |
| Pts | 67-47 | 62-42 |
| Total Points | 114 | 104 |
| Winners | 18 | 20 |
| %Winners | 27% | 32% |
Both Cukierman and Safwat played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cukierman and Safwat have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (16). Daniel scored 18 winners (27% of the total points). On the other side, Safwat managed to score 20 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cukierman | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
| 1st in | 24/49 | 26/50 |
| %1st in | 49% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 20/26 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 16/24 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 67% |
Cukierman recorded 1 ace . Safwat also struck 2 aces . Cukierman won 75% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Safwat won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cukierman | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 56% | 44% |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Cukierman broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Israeli conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Mohamed broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Safwat was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Cukierman | |||
| Q1 Berrut |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 67-47 | 67-47 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 24/49 | 24/49 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Safwat | |||
| Q1 Moghini |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 62-42 | 62-42 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/50 | 26/50 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 20/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/24 | 16/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWWL
LWWWLLWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marius CopilCopil – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karol DrzewieckiDrzewiecki – Kirill KivattsevKivattsev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Daniel MasurMasur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco FortiForti – Luca PotenzaPotenza (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
