Zsombor Piros and Daniel Michalski will play each other in the 2nd round of the Szekesfehervar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zsombor Piros who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zsombor Piros is the pick to win this match.
Zsombor Piros -> 1.42
Daniel Michalski -> 2.71
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zsombor Piros vs. Daniel Michalski
There is no head to head record between Zsombor Piros and Daniel Michalski since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Zsombor Piros
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-16 | 6-4 | 26-8 | 7-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-29 | 1-6 | 17-17 | 13-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-29 | 3-2 | 35-18 | 5-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-23 | 7-6 | 19-9 | 10-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-16 | 3-2 | 31-9 | 13-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 179, Piros reached the 2nd round after beating Kimmer Coppejans 6-75 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round against Coppejans, Zsombor recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-1 6-3). During the match, Piros scored 95 points vs Coppejans’s 83. Piros was pretty aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Piros recorded 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Zsombor Piros lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Piros put 62% of his first serves in, winning 64% (38/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (19/36) on the 2nd serve. Zsombor broke Coppejans 7 times after converting 50% of his break points (7/14).
Piros has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (190-111). 1-0 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Piros has a composed118-55 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
Zsombor has a compiled 6-6 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szekesfehervar Challenger
Zsombor has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Michalski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52-30 | 5-3 | 47-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-26 | 1-6 | 36-19 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-25 | 4-6 | 36-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-3 | 47-20 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 278, Michalski got to the 2nd round after beating Julian Ocleppo 7-64 6-3.
In the 1st round, Michalski had a good straight sets win against Ocleppo (7-64 6-3). During the match Michalski scored 71 points vs Ocleppo’s 62. Daniel was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Michalski struck 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Daniel Michalski lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Michalski put 58% of his first serves in, winning 62% (26/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 70% (21/30) on the 2nd serve. Michalski broke Ocleppo 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Daniel has an aggregate 7-8 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Piros | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 22 |
| Pts | 95-83 | 71-62 |
| Total Points | 178 | 133 |
| Winners | 38 | 26 |
| %Winners | 40% | 37% |
Both Piros and Michalski played 1 match. At the moment, Zsombor Piros conceded 1 set while Daniel Michalski hasn’t conceded a set so far. Piros has played 1 set more than Michalski (3 vs 2). Therefore, Piros played 7 games more than Michalski. Zsombor scored 38 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Michalski blasted 26 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Piros | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 4 |
| 1st in | 59/95 | 42/72 |
| %1st in | 62% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 38/59 | 26/42 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 21/30 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 70% |
Piros scored 4 aces . Michalski bagged 4 aces . Piros won 64% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Michalski won 62% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Piros | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 3 |
| Converted | 7/14 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 60% |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 |
| Saved | 4 | 1 |
| % Saved | 57% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
The Hungarian broke his opponent 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Piros surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. The Pole broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Pole conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Piros | |||
| R1 Coppejans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 95-83 | 95-83 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 59/95 | 59/95 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 38/59 | 38/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 19/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Michalski | |||
| R1 Ocleppo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 71-62 | 71-62 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 42/72 | 42/72 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 26/42 | 26/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/30 | 21/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWL
LWLLWWWLWW Tennis Scores in Szekesfehervar Challenger
- Evan FurnessFurness – Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit (6-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Mate ValkuszValkusz (4-6 6-3 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Titouan DroguetDroguet (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Benjamin HassanHassan (5-7 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Gerald MelzerMelzer (6-74 6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-4 6-73 6-4) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Ivan GakhovGakhov (6-74 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Julian OcleppoOcleppo (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-75 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (2-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Steven DiezDiez – Joao DominguesDomingues (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirza BasicBasic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Steven DiezDiez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matyas FueleFuele – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Gergely MadaraszMadarasz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
