Ethan Quinn and Johannes Ingildsen will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ethan Quinn is the pick to win this match.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.35
Johannes Ingildsen -> 2.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ethan Quinn vs. Johannes Ingildsen
There is no head to head record between Ethan Quinn and Johannes Ingildsen since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 485, Quinn reached the qualifications after defeating Osgar O’Hoisin 6-3 3-6 7-65.
In the qualifications, Ethan defeated O’Hoisin (6-3 3-6 7-65).During the match, Quinn scored less points (5) than O’Hoisin. In fact, the world no. 485 won 102 points vs O’Hoisin’s. That means that Quinn was more focused during the important points. Ethan was extremely aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about the service games, Quinn managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 58% of his first serves in, winning 71% (45/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (18/46) on the 2nd serve. Quinn broke O’Hoisin 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Quinn has a solid match record in the last 2 years having won 67% of his matches (32-16). 1-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Quinn has an overall1-2 match record in the last 2 years on indoor hard courts.
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Vero Beach,M15 San Diego and M25 Champaign.
The American has a composed 28-13 win-loss record in 2022, 1-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Ethan has never competed in this tournament before.
Johannes Ingildsen
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-23 | 19-16 | 2-1 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-25 | 6-6 | 11-13 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-10 | 10-4 | 6-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 721, the Dane got to the qualifications after beating Jaimee Floyd Angele 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, Johannes had a good straight sets win against Floyd Angele (6-1 6-2). During the match Ingildsen scored 62 points vs Floyd Angele’s 42. The Dane was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Ingildsen managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Johannes Ingildsen was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (20/26) of his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Johannes broke Floyd Angele 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Johannes has an overall 22-24 win-loss record in 2022, 6-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Quinn | Ingildsen |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 15 |
| Pts | 102-107 | 62-42 |
| Total Points | 209 | 104 |
| Winners | 45 | 20 |
| %Winners | 44% | 32% |
Both Quinn and Ingildsen played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ethan Quinn surrendered 1 set while Johannes Ingildsen hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Quinn has played 1 set more than Ingildsen (3 vs 2). Therefore, Quinn played 16 games more than Ingildsen. Ethan scored 45 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Ingildsen managed to score 20 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Quinn | Ingildsen |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 8 |
| 1st in | 63/109 | 26/57 |
| %1st in | 58% | 46% |
| 1st pts | 45/63 | 20/26 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 18/46 | 17/31 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 55% |
Quinn scored 4 aces . Ingildsen made 8 aces . Quinn won 71% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Ingildsen won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Quinn | Ingildsen |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 83% | 57% |
| Conceded | 12 | 3 |
| Saved | 7 | 3 |
| % Saved | 58% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Ethan conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. The Dane broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Johannes was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Quinn | |||
| Q1 O’Hoisin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 102-107 | 102-107 | |
| Total points | 209 | 209 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 63/109 | 63/109 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 45/63 | 45/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/46 | 18/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 7/12 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 58% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Ingildsen | |||
| Q1 Floyd |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 62-42 | 62-42 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 26/57 | 26/57 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 20/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 17/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLLWWL
LLLWLLWWLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Benjamin LockLock (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Ezekiel ClarkClark (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – Nick ChappellChappell (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Theo ArribageArribage (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Alafia AyeniAyeni (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Nathan PonwithPonwith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hunter HeckHeck – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karlis OzolinsOzolins – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
