Tomas Machac and Lukas Klein will fight against each other in the quarter of the Bratislava Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 7:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tomas Machac who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tomas Machac is the pick to win this match.
Tomas Machac -> 1.76
Lukas Klein -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tomas Machac vs. Lukas Klein
This will be the 2nd time that Tomas Machac and Lukas Klein play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Machac (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Machac won 7-6(5) 6-2 in the semifinal in the Bratislava Challenger back in 2020.
Tomas Machac
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-24 | 22-11 | 9-5 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-27 | 15-10 | 16-11 | 18-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-19 | 24-6 | 5-2 | 18-10 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 28-19 | 5-4 | 5-4 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 4-2 |
| 2020 | 27-12 | 0-0 | 12-6 | 15-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 117, the Czech got to the quarter after beating Ryan Peniston 6-4 7-5 and Stefano Travaglia 6-4 7-64.
In the 2nd round, Machac had a good straight sets win against Travaglia (6-4 7-64). During the match, Machac scored 73 points vs Travaglia’s 58. The Czech was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Machac recorded 6 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Tomas Machac was very efficient on serve to win 76% (35/46) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Tomas broke Travaglia 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Czech hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Machac has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 68% of his matches (162-77). 12-7 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Machac has an aggregate57-27 match record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Tomas’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Traralgon Challenger and the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger.
Tomas has a compiled 41-16 win-loss record in 2022, 12-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava Challenger
Lukas Klein
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-24 | 16-10 | 9-7 | 5-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-29 | 9-8 | 15-12 | 11-6 | 1-2 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 44-22 | 5-0 | 27-17 | 8-3 | 3-1 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 0-2 | 23-17 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-15 | 1-1 | 4-5 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 146 (career-high), Klein reached the quarter after defeating Hamad Medjedovic 6-3 6-2 and Jozef Kovalik 7-65 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Lukas had a good straight sets win against Kovalik (7-65 6-3). During the match Klein scored 81 points vs Kovalik’s 71. The Slovakian was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Klein made 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Lukas Klein lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Klein put 59% of his first serves in, winning 69% (31/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (19/31) on the 2nd serve. Klein broke Kovalik 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lukas hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
The Slovakian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Troisdorf Challenger,the Alicante Challenger and the Ortisei Challenger.
Lukas has a compiled 44-21 win-loss record in 2022, 8-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2020. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Machac | Klein |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 45 | 39 |
| Pts | 148-121 | 140-105 |
| Total Points | 269 | 245 |
| Winners | 61 | 63 |
| %Winners | 41% | 45% |
Both Machac and Klein played 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Machac and Klein have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Machac played 6 games more than Klein. Machac scored 61 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Slovakian fired 63 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Machac | Klein |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 12.5 |
| 1st in | 81/117 | 79/116 |
| %1st in | 69% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 61/81 | 63/79 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 22/36 | 23/37 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 62% |
Machac managed to score 10 aces (5 per match). Klein fired 25 aces (12.5 per match). Machac won 75% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Klein won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Machac | Klein |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/14 | 6/13 |
| % Converted | 50% | 46% |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 20% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
The Czech broke his opponents 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Machac surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 20% of the break points that he conceded. Klein broke his opponents 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Klein conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Machac | ||||
| R1 Peniston |
R2 Travaglia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 23 | 45 | |
| pts | 75-63 | 73-58 | 148-121 | |
| Total points | 138 | 131 | 269 | |
| Winners | 26 | 35 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 48% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/56 | 46/61 | 81/117 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 75% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 35/46 | 61/81 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 76% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 10/15 | 22/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 67% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 3/5 | 7/14 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 60% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 33% | 17% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Klein | ||||
| R1 Medjedovic |
R2 Kovalik |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 22 | 39 | |
| pts | 59-34 | 81-71 | 140-105 | |
| Total points | 93 | 152 | 245 | |
| Winners | 32 | 31 | 63 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 38% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 16 | 9 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/40 | 45/76 | 79/116 | |
| % 1st in | 85% | 59% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 32/34 | 31/45 | 63/79 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 69% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/6 | 19/31 | 23/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 61% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/7 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 43% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | 80% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLWWW
LWWWWLWLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Norbert GombosGombos – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Tomas MachacMachac (0-1) – H2H and prediction
