Edan Leshem and Martin Damm will play each other in the qualifications of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 2:00 pm on BRENDA MYERS COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Damm who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Martin Damm is the pick to win this match.
Martin Damm -> 1.615
Edan Leshem -> 2.19
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Edan Leshem vs. Martin Damm
There is no head to head record between Edan Leshem and Martin Damm since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Edan Leshem
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-17 | 6-8 | 1-1 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-30 | 33-20 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 24-19 | 19-13 | 0-2 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-12 | 2-7 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 389, Leshem reached the qualifications after beating Pedro Rodenas 7-66 6-1.
In the qualifications, Leshem had a good straight sets win against Rodenas (7-66 6-1). During the match, Leshem scored 66 points vs Rodenas’s 48. Edan was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Leshem struck 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Edan Leshem lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Leshem put 59% of his first serves in, winning 69% (25/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. Leshem broke Rodenas 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Leshem has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (253-173). 4-6 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Leshem has an aggregate20-31 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Leshem’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham,M15 Raanana and M25 Tbilisi.
Leshem has a composed 37-27 win-loss record in 2022, 4-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Martin Damm
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-19 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-11 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 461 (career-high), the American got to the qualifications after beating Gage Brymer 6-3 7-64.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Brymer (6-3 7-64). During the match Damm scored 78 points vs Brymer’s 71. Damm was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Damm bagged 15 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Martin Damm was very effective on serve to win 76% (37/49) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Brymer once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Jablonec nad Nisou,M25 Santo Domingo and M25 Harlingen.
The American has an aggregate 32-21 win-loss record in 2022, 5-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Leshem | Damm |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 22 |
| Pts | 66-48 | 78-71 |
| Total Points | 114 | 149 |
| Winners | 25 | 37 |
| %Winners | 38% | 47% |
Both Leshem and Damm played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Leshem and Damm have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Leshem played 2 games less than Damm. Leshem scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Martin recorded 37 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Leshem | Damm |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 15 |
| 1st in | 36/61 | 49/76 |
| %1st in | 59% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 25/36 | 37/49 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 16/27 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 59% |
Leshem struck 2 aces . Damm blasted 15 aces . Leshem won 69% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Damm won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Leshem | Damm |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 1 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 1/3 |
| % Converted | 50% | 33% |
| Conceded | 5 | 1 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 40% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
The Israeli broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Edan dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Martin broke his opponent once with a 33% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Leshem | |||
| Q1 Rodenas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 66-48 | 66-48 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 36/61 | 36/61 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 25/36 | 25/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Damm | |||
| Q1 Brymer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 78-71 | 78-71 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 49/76 | 49/76 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 37/49 | 37/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/3 | 1/3 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLW
LLLWLLLLLL Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Keegan SmithSmith (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nathan PonwithPonwith – Charles BroomBroom (6-2 2-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Donald YoungYoung (6-0 4-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Murphy CassoneMurphy – Strong KirchheimerStrong (4-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Stefan KozlovKozlov (3-4) – H2H and prediction
- Edan LeshemLeshem – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Michael MmohMmoh (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (2-0) – H2H and prediction
