Jason Murray Kubler and Alibek Kachmazov will face off in the qualifications of the Bergamo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Murray Kubler who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jason Murray Kubler is the pick to win this match.
Jason Murray Kubler -> 1.35
Alibek Kachmazov -> 2.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Murray Kubler vs. Alibek Kachmazov
There is no head to head record between Jason Murray Kubler and Alibek Kachmazov since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jason Murray Kubler
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 8-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 25-19 | 10-9 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 50-22 | 17-10 | 20-5 | 4-5 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-15 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 6-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 101, Murray Kubler got to the qualifications after defeating Alexandar Lazarov 6-4 7-65.
In the qualifications, Murray Kubler had a good straight sets win against Lazarov (6-4 7-65). During the match, Murray Kubler scored 75 points vs Lazarov’s 66. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Murray Kubler scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jason Murray Kubler was quite efficient on serve to win 71% (29/41) of his 1st serve and 57% (17/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Murray Kubler broke Lazarov 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Murray Kubler has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 68% of his matches (301-141). 4-3 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Murray Kubler has a compiled 6-8 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Murray Kubler’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Canberra,the Little Rock Challenger and the Orlando Challenger.
Murray Kubler has an aggregate 50-20 win-loss record in 2022, 4-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bergamo Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Alibek Kachmazov
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 37-28 | 17-13 | 6-6 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 49-31 | 24-14 | 9-6 | 14-10 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2022 | 49-21 | 18-11 | 9-5 | 22-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-20 | 6-8 | 3-6 | 27-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-11 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 336, Alibek got to the qualifications after defeating Alexey Vatutin 7-5 5-7 7-65.
In the qualifications, The Russian defeated Vatutin (7-5 5-7 7-65).During the match Kachmazov scored less points (6) than Vatutin. In fact, the world no. 101 won 122 points vs Vatutin’s. That means that Kachmazov was more focused during the important points. The Russian was pretty aggressive to blast 51 winners.
About the serving games, Kachmazov scored 9 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Alibek Kachmazov lost the serve 6 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Kachmazov put 60% of his first serves in, winning 69% (51/74) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (18/49) on the 2nd serve. Alibek broke Vatutin 6 times after converting 35% of his break points (6/17).
Kachmazov’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Kazan,Sultan,M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M15 Shymkent.
The Russian has a composed 40-17 win-loss record in 2022, 13-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Murray Kubler | Kachmazov |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 23 | 37 |
Pts | 75-66 | 122-128 |
Total Points | 141 | 250 |
Winners | 29 | 51 |
%Winners | 39% | 42% |
Both Murray Kubler and Kachmazov played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Alibek Kachmazov conceded 1 set while Jason Murray Kubler hasn’t conceded a set so far. Murray Kubler has played 1 set(s) less than Kachmazov (2 vs 3). Therefore, Murray Kubler played 14 games less than Kachmazov. Jason scored 29 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Alibek fired 51 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Murray Kubler | Kachmazov |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 9 |
Avg per match | 1 | 9 |
1st in | 41/71 | 74/123 |
%1st in | 58% | 60% |
1st pts | 29/41 | 51/74 |
%1st pts | 71% | 69% |
2nd pts | 17/30 | 18/49 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 37% |
Murray Kubler bagged 1 ace . Kachmazov also blasted 9 aces . Murray Kubler won 71% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Kachmazov won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Murray Kubler | Kachmazov |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 6 |
Converted | 3/7 | 6/17 |
% Converted | 43% | 35% |
Conceded | 4 | 12 |
Saved | 2 | 6 |
% Saved | 50% | 50% |
Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
Murray Kubler broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Russian broke his opponent 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. Kachmazov conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Murray Kubler | |||
Q1 Lazarov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 75-66 | 75-66 | |
Total points | 141 | 141 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 41/71 | 41/71 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 29/41 | 29/41 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 17/30 | 17/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Kachmazov | |||
Q1 Vatutin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 5-7 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 37 | 37 | |
pts | 122-128 | 122-128 | |
Total points | 250 | 250 | |
Winners | 51 | 51 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 74/123 | 74/123 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 51/74 | 51/74 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 18/49 | 18/49 | |
% 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/17 | 6/17 | |
Converted % | 35% | 35% | |
Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
Saved | 6/12 | 6 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 6 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Nuno BorgesBorges (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Marius CopilCopil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Giovanni OradiniOradini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine BellierBellier – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Fernando VerdascoVerdasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (0-1) – H2H and prediction