Federico Coria and Timofey Skatov will fight against each other in the quarter of the Coquimbo 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 2:00 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Coria who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Federico Coria is the pick to win this match.
Federico Coria -> 1.57
Timofey Skatov -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Coria vs. Timofey Skatov
There is no head to head record between Federico Coria and Timofey Skatov since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Federico Coria
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43-34 | 0-3 | 43-30 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 3-8 | 35-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-32 | 2-5 | 39-26 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-31 | 2-7 | 40-20 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-22 | 3-5 | 15-13 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 71, Federico reached the quarter after beating Alessandro Giannessi 6-4 6-2 and Mariano Navone 5-7 6-2 6-1.
In the 2nd round against Navone, Federico recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-2 6-1). During the match, Coria scored 111 points vs Navone’s 91. Coria was extremely aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Regarding the service games, Coria was unable to score even 1 ace and he committed only 3 double faults. Federico Coria lost the serve 5 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Coria put 72% of his first serves in, winning 55% (47/85) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the 2nd serve. Coria broke Navone 8 times after converting 50% of his break points (8/16).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Federico has lost 1 set in this tournament to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Coria has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (462-276). 32-23 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Coria has a composed 449-240 record in the last years on clay.
Federico’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Milan Challenger.
The Argentine has an overall 34-29 win-loss record in 2022, 32-23 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Coquimbo 2 Challenger
Coria has never competed in this tournament before.
Timofey Skatov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-23 | 5-7 | 29-14 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 6-4 | 23-22 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-32 | 4-3 | 30-27 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 0-2 | 33-21 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 37-14 | 3-1 | 34-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 158, Timofey got to the quarter after defeating Daniel Rincon 7-5 6-2 and Nicolas Kicker 6-4 1-6 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Timofey defeated Kicker (6-4 1-6 6-4).During the match Skatov scored less points (4) than Kicker. In fact, the world no. 71 won 91 points vs Kicker’s. That means that Skatov was more focused during the important points. The Kazakhstani was quite aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Skatov couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Timofey Skatov lost the serve 5 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Skatov put 76% of his first serves in, winning 60% (46/77) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. The Kazakhstani broke Kicker 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Timofey has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The Kazakhstani’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Parma Challenger.
The Kazakhstani has a composed 31-28 win-loss record in 2022, 27-23 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Coria | Skatov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 45 | 47 |
| Pts | 179-142 | 157-142 |
| Total Points | 321 | 299 |
| Winners | 71 | 74 |
| %Winners | 40% | 47% |
Both Coria and Skatov played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Federico Coria dropped 1 set, while Timofey Skatov conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Coria and Skatov have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Coria played 2 games less than Skatov. Coria scored 71 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Skatov made 74 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Coria | Skatov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 1st in | 129/172 | 118/156 |
| %1st in | 75% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 71/129 | 74/118 |
| %1st pts | 55% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 27/43 | 19/38 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 50% |
Coria recorded 1 ace (0.5 per match). Skatov also made 1 ace (0.5 per match). Coria won 55% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Skatov won 63% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Coria | Skatov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 9 |
| Converted | 13/26 | 9/18 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 19 | 16 |
| Saved | 12 | 9 |
| % Saved | 63% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 7 |
The Argentine broke his opponents 13 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Argentine lost his serve 7 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Skatov broke his opponents 9 times with a 50% conversion rate. Timofey conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Coria | ||||
| R1 Giannessi |
R2 Navone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 5-7 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 27 | 45 | |
| pts | 68-51 | 111-91 | 179-142 | |
| Total points | 119 | 202 | 321 | |
| Winners | 24 | 47 | 71 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 42% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 44/54 | 85/118 | 129/172 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 72% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 24/44 | 47/85 | 71/129 | |
| % 1st pts | 55% | 55% | 55% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/10 | 17/33 | 27/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 100% | 52% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 8/16 | 13/26 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 13 | 19 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 8/13 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 62% | 65% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Skatov | ||||
| R1 Rincon |
R2 Kicker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 27 | 47 | |
| pts | 66-47 | 91-95 | 157-142 | |
| Total points | 113 | 186 | 299 | |
| Winners | 28 | 46 | 74 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 51% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 41/55 | 77/101 | 118/156 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 28/41 | 46/77 | 74/118 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 60% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 11/24 | 19/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 46% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/11 | 9/18 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 36% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 13 | 16 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 8/13 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 62% | 48% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWW
LLLWLWWWLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Andrea CollariniCollarini (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (1-2) – H2H and prediction
