Andrew Paulson and Jerome Kym will face off in the qualifications of the Hamburg Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jerome Kym who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jerome Kym is the pick to win this match.
Jerome Kym -> 1.85
Andrew Paulson -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andrew Paulson vs. Jerome Kym
This will be the 2nd time that Andrew Paulson and Jerome Kym square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Paulson (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Paulson won 6-1 6-4 in the 2nd round in M25 Trimbach back in March 2022.
Andrew Paulson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-22 | 1-3 | 31-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 53-27 | 6-3 | 30-15 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2021 | 47-26 | 19-8 | 11-11 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 375 (career-high), Paulson got to the qualifications after beating Philip Florig 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Florig (6-2 6-2). During the match, Paulson scored 64 points vs Florig’s 43. Andrew was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Paulson fired 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Andrew Paulson was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 74% (17/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Andrew broke Florig 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Paulson has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 63% of his matches (110-65). 7-3 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Paulson has a compiled27-15 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
The Czech’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Most and M15 Prostejov.
Paulson has an aggregate 45-23 win-loss record in 2022, 7-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hamburg Challenger
Andrew has never competed in this tournament before.
Jerome Kym
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-20 | 6-3 | 17-13 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 59-20 | 14-4 | 37-11 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 427, Jerome got to the qualifications after beating Noel Larwig 6-0 6-2.
In the qualifications, Kym had a good straight sets win against Larwig (6-0 6-2). During the match Kym scored 59 points vs Larwig’s 29. Kym was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Kym bagged 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jerome Kym was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (21/27) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jerome broke Larwig 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Jerome’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Heraklion,M25 Setubal and M25+H Plaisir.
Kym has a compiled 41-20 win-loss record in 2022, 9-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Paulson | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 14 |
| Pts | 64-43 | 59-29 |
| Total Points | 107 | 88 |
| Winners | 18 | 21 |
| %Winners | 28% | 36% |
Both Paulson and Kym played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Paulson and Kym have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Paulson played 2 games more than Kym. Paulson scored 18 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, The Swiss scored 21 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Paulson | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
| 1st in | 24/47 | 27/41 |
| %1st in | 51% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 21/27 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 17/23 | 9/14 |
| %2nd pts | 74% | 64% |
Paulson struck 2 aces . Kym fired 5 aces . Paulson won 75% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 74% of the points. On the other side, Kym won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Paulson | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 36% | 50% |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Andrew broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Paulson very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Kym broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jerome was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Paulson | |||
| Q1 Florig |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 64-43 | 64-43 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/47 | 24/47 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/23 | 17/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kym | |||
| Q1 Larwig |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 59-29 | 59-29 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/41 | 27/41 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 21/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWLLLL
LLLWWWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – Jeremy JahnJahn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Julian LenzLenz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Jelle SelsSels (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
