![Prediction And Head To Head Marek Gengel Vs. Shintaro Mochizuki Duslviisqn Prediction and head to head Marek Gengel vs. Shintaro Mochizuki](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Marek-Gengel-vs.-Shintaro-Mochizuki-dusLvIiSqn.jpg)
Marek Gengel and Shintaro Mochizuki will face off in the qualifications of the Busan Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Shintaro Mochizuki who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Shintaro Mochizuki is the pick to win this match.
Shintaro Mochizuki -> 1.57
Marek Gengel -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marek Gengel vs. Shintaro Mochizuki
This will be the 2nd time that Marek Gengel and Shintaro Mochizuki square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Mochizuki (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Mochizuki won 6-2 6-3 in the qualifications in the Seoul Challenger back in October 2022.
Marek Gengel
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-14 | 33-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-17 | 16-12 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 379,he will start his run in the Busan Challenger after he played his last match in the Busan Challenger where he overcame 6-3 6-2 to Lee in the qualifications on the 16th of October.
Marek has a compiled 26-25 win-loss record in 2022, 17-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Marek’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh.
Talking about his overall career, Marek has an overall 203-165 record. He has a positive 146-77 record on hard.
Previously in the Busan Challenger
The Czech has never competed in this tournament before.
Shintaro Mochizuki
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-17 | 5-8 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-33 | 22-16 | 13-8 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 37-34 | 18-17 | 13-12 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 35-30 | 11-10 | 18-11 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 0-1 |
2020 | 20-14 | 14-12 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 407, will start his run in the Busan Challenger after he played his last match in the Busan Challenger where he beat 6-2 6-4 to Hoon Son in the qualifications on the 16th of October.
Shintaro has a compiled 29-29 win-loss record in 2022, 12-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
In terms of his career, Shintaro has an overall 98-82 record. He has a positive 49-43 record on hard.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gengel | Mochizuki |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 17 | 18 |
Pts | 66-46 | 67-48 |
Total Points | 112 | 115 |
Winners | 27 | 20 |
%Winners | 41% | 30% |
Both Gengel and Mochizuki played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gengel and Mochizuki have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gengel played 1 game less than Mochizuki. The Czech scored 27 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Shintaro bagged 20 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gengel | Mochizuki |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 1 |
Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
1st in | 40/58 | 29/46 |
%1st in | 69% | 63% |
1st pts | 27/40 | 20/29 |
%1st pts | 68% | 69% |
2nd pts | 9/18 | 11/17 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 65% |
Gengel made 1 ace . Mochizuki also made 1 ace . Gengel won 68% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Mochizuki won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gengel | Mochizuki |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 5 |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/14 |
% Converted | 83% | 36% |
Conceded | 5 | 2 |
Saved | 3 | 0 |
% Saved | 60% | 0% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Marek broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. The Czech surrendered his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Mochizuki broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. Mochizuki conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Gengel | ||
Total | ||
---|---|---|
Score | ||
Tot Set | 0 | |
Tot Games | 0 | |
pts | 0-0 | |
Total points | 0 | |
Winners | 0 | |
%Winners | 0% | |
SERVE | ||
Aces | 0 | |
Double Faults | 0 | |
1st in | 0/0 | |
% 1st in | 0% | |
1st pts | 0/0 | |
% 1st pts | % | |
2nd pts | 0/0 | |
% 2nd pts | 0% | |
Breaks | ||
Won | 0 | |
Converted | 0/0 | |
Converted % | 0% | |
Conceded | 0 | |
Saved | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 |
Mochizuki | ||
Total | ||
---|---|---|
Score | ||
Tot Set | 0 | |
Tot Games | 0 | |
pts | 0-0 | |
Total points | 0 | |
Winners | 0 | |
%Winners | 0% | |
SERVE | ||
Aces | 0 | |
Double Faults | 0 | |
1st in | 0/0 | |
% 1st in | 0% | |
1st pts | 0/0 | |
% 1st pts | 0% | |
2nd pts | 0/0 | |
% 2nd pts | 0% | |
Breaks | ||
Won | 0 | |
Converted | 0/0 | |
Converted % | 0% | |
Conceded | 0 | |
Saved | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- John MillmanMillman – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Yibing WuWu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Marc PolmansPolmans (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Makoto OchiOchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Shinji HazawaHazawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Christopher EubanksEubanks (1-0) – H2H and prediction