Jordan Thompson and Emilio Gomez will clash against each other in the final of the Columbus 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jordan Thompson who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jordan Thompson is the pick to win this match.
Jordan Thompson -> 1.5
Emilio Gomez -> 2.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jordan Thompson vs. Emilio Gomez
There is no head to head record between Jordan Thompson and Emilio Gomez since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jordan Thompson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-24 | 23-13 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-28 | 22-15 | 0-3 | 7-4 | 12-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-26 | 18-14 | 2-6 | 8-1 | 12-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-25 | 10-11 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 2-2 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 98, the Australian got to the final after beating Charles Broom 7-65 6-2, Mukund Sasikumar 6-3 6-3, Gabriel Diallo 6-2 6-1 and Cannon Kingsley 7-66 6-3.
In the semifinal, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Kingsley (7-66 6-3). During the match, Thompson scored 70 points vs Kingsley’s 56. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Thompson recorded 12 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Jordan Thompson was pretty effective on serve to win 85% (34/40) of his 1st serve and 75% (15/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Thompson broke Kingsley once after converting 14% of his break points (1/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jordan hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Thompson has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (382-255). 6-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Thompson has an aggregate 27-15 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Thompson’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Surbiton Challenger and the Nottingham Challenger.
Thompson has an aggregate 34-25 win-loss record in 2022, 6-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus 2 Challenger
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 114, the Ecuadorian reached the final after defeating Robert Cash 6-3 6-2, Tennys Sandgren 3-6 6-3 6-2, Nick Chappell 6-3 6-1 and Rinky Hijikata 3-6 6-3 6-0.
In the semifinal against Hijikata, Gomez recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-0). During the match Gomez scored 88 points vs Hijikata’s 77. The Ecuadorian was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Gomez made 5 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 56% of his first serves in, winning 79% (34/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (16/34) on the 2nd serve. Emilio broke Hijikata 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Ecuadorian has conceded 4 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
The Ecuadorian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Salinas Challenger,the Malaga Challenger,the Winnipeg Challenger and the Lexington Challenger.
Gomez has an overall 39-19 win-loss record in 2022, 7-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Thompson | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 76 | 83 |
| Pts | 270-201 | 311-251 |
| Total Points | 471 | 562 |
| Winners | 121 | 123 |
| %Winners | 45% | 40% |
Both Thompson and Gomez played 4 matches. At the moment, Emilio Gomez surrendered 2 sets while Jordan Thompson hasn’t dropped a set so far. Thompson has played 2 set(s) less than Gomez (8 vs 10). Therefore, Thompson played 7 games less than Gomez. The Australian scored 121 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Ecuadorian scored 123 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Thompson | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 44 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 3 |
| 1st in | 154/222 | 165/269 |
| %1st in | 69% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 121/154 | 123/165 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 45/68 | 56/104 |
| %2nd pts | 66% | 54% |
Thompson struck 44 aces (11 per match). Gomez scored 12 aces (3 per match). Thompson won 79% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 66% of the points. On the other side, Gomez won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Thompson | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 16 |
| Converted | 11/30 | 16/42 |
| % Converted | 37% | 38% |
| Conceded | 1 | 27 |
| Saved | 0 | 23 |
| % Saved | 0% | 85% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Jordan broke his opponents 11 times with a 37% conversion rate. Jordan dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Gomez broke his opponents 16 times with a 38% conversion rate. Gomez conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded.
| Thompson | ||||||
| R1 Broom |
R2 Kumar Mukund |
1/4 Diallo |
1/2 Kingsley |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | 6-2 6-1 | 7-66 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 15 | 22 | 76 | |
| pts | 81-68 | 65-44 | 54-33 | 70-56 | 270-201 | |
| Total points | 149 | 109 | 87 | 126 | 471 | |
| Winners | 38 | 26 | 23 | 34 | 121 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 40% | 43% | 49% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 16 | 12 | 4 | 12 | 44 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 51/68 | 32/46 | 31/48 | 40/60 | 154/222 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 70% | 65% | 67% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 38/51 | 26/32 | 23/31 | 34/40 | 121/154 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 81% | 74% | 85% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 9/14 | 10/17 | 15/20 | 45/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 64% | 59% | 75% | 66% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 4/7 | 4/6 | 1/7 | 11/30 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 57% | 67% | 14% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Gomez | ||||||||||
| R1 Cash |
R1 Cash |
R2 Sandgren |
R2 Sandgren |
1/4 Chappell |
1/4 Chappell |
1/2 Hijikata |
1/2 Hijikata |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-1 | 6-3 6-1 | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 20 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 26 | 26 | 16 | 16 | 24 | 24 | 166 | |
| pts | 66-45 | 66-45 | 89-82 | 89-82 | 68-47 | 68-47 | 88-77 | 88-77 | 622-502 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | 171 | 171 | 115 | 115 | 165 | 165 | 1124 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | 44 | 44 | 27 | 27 | 34 | 34 | 246 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | 49% | 49% | 40% | 40% | 39% | 39% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||||||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 24 | |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 26/45 | 60/90 | 60/90 | 36/57 | 36/57 | 43/77 | 43/77 | 330/538 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | 67% | 67% | 63% | 63% | 56% | 56% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 18/26 | 18/26 | 44/60 | 44/60 | 27/36 | 27/36 | 34/43 | 34/43 | 246/330 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | 73% | 73% | 75% | 75% | 79% | 79% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | 15/30 | 15/30 | 13/21 | 13/21 | 16/34 | 16/34 | 112/208 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | 50% | 50% | 62% | 62% | 47% | 47% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 32 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | 3/13 | 3/13 | 4/10 | 4/10 | 4/8 | 4/8 | 32/84 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | 23% | 23% | 40% | 40% | 50% | 50% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 54 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0/2 | 11/12 | 11/12 | 7/7 | 7/7 | 5/6 | 5/6 | 46 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | 92% | 92% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 83% | 138% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLWLLW
LLLLLLWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
