Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Kenny de Schepper will clash against each other in the quarter of the Como Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cedrik-Marcel Stebe who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe is the pick to win this match.
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe -> 1.36
Kenny de Schepper -> 3.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs. Kenny de Schepper
There is no head to head record between Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Kenny de Schepper since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-25 | 2-6 | 10-13 | 15-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 14-20 | 4-7 | 9-9 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 18-11 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2019 | 18-18 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 11-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 233, the German got to the quarter after beating Mirza Basic 6-4 6-0 and Lucas Gerch 4-6 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Gerch, Stebe recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-2). During the match, Stebe scored 102 points vs Gerch’s 87. Cedrik-Marcel was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Stebe scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Cedrik-Marcel Stebe lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Stebe put 58% of his first serves in, winning 66% (38/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (23/42) on the 2nd serve. Stebe broke Gerch 5 times after converting 31% of his break points (5/16).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Cedrik-Marcel has lost 1 set in this competition to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Stebe has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (191-130). 7-11 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Stebe has an aggregate 98-63 match record in the last years on clay.
The German’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Forli 1 Challenger,the Forli 3 Challenger and the Lugano Challenger.
Stebe has a compiled 24-22 win-loss record in 2022, 7-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Como Challenger
Kenny de Schepper
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 31-31 | 14-9 | 4-8 | 13-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-29 | 7-4 | 8-14 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-35 | 6-7 | 18-16 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-24 | 22-8 | 5-5 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 9-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 359, the French player reached the quarter after defeating Martin Cuevas 7-5 6-1, Alessandro Giannessi 4-6 6-3 1-0 ret. and Marius Copil 5-7 6-4 7-5.
In the 2nd round against Copil, De Schepper recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 7-5). During the match de Schepper scored 116 points vs Copil’s 110. The French player was extremely aggressive to blast 50 winners.
About the serving games, de Schepper fired 4 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Kenny de Schepper lost the serve 5 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, de Schepper put 67% of his first serves in, winning 67% (50/75) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (16/37) on the 2nd serve. Kenny broke Copil 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kenny started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
De Schepper’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Balma.
The French player has a compiled 31-23 win-loss record in 2022, 17-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Stebe | de Schepper |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 3 |
Tot Set | 5 | 9 |
Tot Games | 43 | 73 |
Pts | 165-129 | 249-224 |
Total Points | 294 | 473 |
Winners | 61 | 122 |
%Winners | 37% | 49% |
Stebe played 2 matches while de Schepper competed in 3 matches. de Schepper started his run from the qualifications while Stebe had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Cedrik-Marcel Stebe lost 1 set, while Kenny de Schepper lost 2 sets. Stebe has played 4 set(s) less than de Schepper (5 vs 9). Therefore, Stebe played 30 games less than de Schepper. Stebe scored 61 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Kenny managed to score 122 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Stebe | de Schepper |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 13 |
Avg per match | 2 | 4.3 |
1st in | 86/145 | 174/250 |
%1st in | 59% | 70% |
1st pts | 61/86 | 122/174 |
%1st pts | 71% | 70% |
2nd pts | 31/59 | 34/76 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 45% |
Stebe managed to score 4 aces (2 per match). de Schepper blasted 13 aces (4.3 per match). Stebe won 71% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, de Schepper won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Stebe | de Schepper |
---|---|---|
Won | 10 | 12 |
Converted | 10/28 | 12/28 |
% Converted | 36% | 43% |
Conceded | 13 | 32 |
Saved | 9 | 25 |
% Saved | 69% | 78% |
Times Broken | 4 | 7 |
Stebe broke his opponents 10 times with a 36% conversion rate. Stebe conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponents 12 times with a 43% conversion rate. De Schepper conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
Stebe | ||||
R1 Basic |
R2 Gerch |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-0 | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 27 | 43 | |
pts | 63-42 | 102-87 | 165-129 | |
Total points | 105 | 189 | 294 | |
Winners | 23 | 38 | 61 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
1st in | 28/45 | 58/100 | 86/145 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 58% | 59% | |
1st pts | 23/28 | 38/58 | 61/86 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 66% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 8/17 | 23/42 | 31/59 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 55% | 53% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
Converted | 5/12 | 5/16 | 10/28 | |
Converted % | 42% | 31% | 36% | |
Conceded | 2 | 11 | 13 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 8/11 | 9 | |
Saved % | 50% | 73% | 62% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 4 |
de Schepper | ||||||
Q1 Cuevas |
Q3 Andreev |
R1 Giannessi |
R2 Copil |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-1 | 6-3 7-63 | 4-6 6-3 1-0 ret. | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 22 | 20 | 34 | 95 | |
pts | 65-51 | – | 68-63 | 116-110 | 249-224 | |
Total points | 116 | 0 | 131 | 226 | 473 | |
Winners | 35 | 37 | 50 | 122 | ||
%Winners | 54% | 0% | 54% | 43% | 49% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 4 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | 12 | ||
1st in | 45/64 | / | 54/74 | 75/112 | 174/250 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 0% | 73% | 67% | 70% | |
1st pts | 35/45 | / | 37/54 | 50/75 | 122/174 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 0% | 69% | 67% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 10/19 | / | 8/20 | 16/37 | 34/76 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 0% | 40% | 43% | 45% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | 12 | ||
Converted | 3/8 | / | 3/6 | 6/14 | 12/28 | |
Converted % | 38% | 0% | 50% | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 8 | 11 | 13 | 32 | ||
Saved | 8/8 | 0/ | 9/11 | 8/13 | 25 | |
Saved % | 100% | – | 82% | 62% | 122% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Lukas KleinKlein (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction