Arthur Fils and Tomas Lipovsek Puches will face off in the qualifications of the Tampere Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 5. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Arthur Fils who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Arthur Fils is the pick to win this match.
Arthur Fils -> 1.078
Tomas Lipovsek Puches -> 7.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Arthur Fils vs. Tomas Lipovsek Puches
There is no head to head record between Arthur Fils and Tomas Lipovsek Puches since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Arthur Fils
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-28 | 15-9 | 14-10 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-24 | 5-4 | 13-8 | 21-10 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-28 | 0-1 | 23-15 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-26 | 3-2 | 29-17 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 346 (career-high), the French player reached the qualifications after defeating Benjamin Hannestad 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Fils had a good straight sets win against Hannestad (6-4 6-1). During the match, Fils scored 67 points vs Hannestad’s 48. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fils bagged 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Arthur Fils was extremely effective on serve to win 81% (29/36) of his 1st serve and 53% (8/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Arthur broke Hannestad 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Fils has a winning record in the last 3 years having won 58% of his matches (62-45). 18-12 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fils has a compiled48-30 match record in the last 3 years on clay.
Arthur has a compiled 28-17 win-loss record in 2022, 18-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tampere Challenger
Arthur has never competed in this tournament before.
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1-11 | 0-5 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-23 | 1-1 | 20-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-20 | 5-6 | 12-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-9 | 10-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 31-22 | 4-4 | 27-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 615, Lipovsek Puches got to the qualifications after defeating Adam Taylor 6-0 6-3.
In the qualifications, Tomas had a good straight sets win against Taylor (AUS) (6-0 6-3). During the match Lipovsek Puches scored 59 points vs Taylor (AUS)’s 34. The Slovenian was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Lipovsek Puches scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Tomas Lipovsek Puches was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tomas broke Taylor (AUS) 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Tomas’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Chieti.
Lipovsek Puches has an overall 15-13 win-loss record in 2022, 15-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fils | Lipovsek Puches |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 |
| Pts | 67-48 | 59-34 |
| Total Points | 115 | 93 |
| Winners | 29 | 21 |
| %Winners | 43% | 36% |
Both Fils and Lipovsek Puches played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fils and Lipovsek Puches have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fils played 2 games more than Lipovsek Puches. Arthur scored 29 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Lipovsek Puches scored 21 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fils | Lipovsek Puches |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 36/51 | 26/40 |
| %1st in | 71% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 29/36 | 21/26 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 9/14 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 64% |
Fils fired 2 aces . Lipovsek Puches made 1 ace . Fils won 81% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Lipovsek Puches won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fils | Lipovsek Puches |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 40% | 56% |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 |
| Saved | 3 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Fils broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Fils extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. The Slovenian broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Slovenian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Fils | |||
| Q1 Hannestad |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 67-48 | 67-48 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 36/51 | 36/51 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 29/36 | 29/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 8/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Lipovsek Puches | |||
| Q1 Taylor (AUS) |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 59-34 | 59-34 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/40 | 26/40 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Ignacio GalarzaIgnacio Galarza – Moez EcharguiEchargui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrik Niklas-SalminenNiklas-Salminen – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Luigi SorrentinoSorrentino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Lucas RenardRenard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Lorenzo BocchiBocchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
