Luca Van Assche and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Trieste Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Luca Van Assche who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Luca Van Assche is the pick to win this match.
Luca Van Assche -> 1.172
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri -> 4.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Luca Van Assche vs. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
There is no head to head record between Luca Van Assche and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Luca Van Assche
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-30 | 15-15 | 8-10 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-30 | 1-7 | 15-11 | 15-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-31 | 0-1 | 40-20 | 15-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-22 | 3-2 | 8-7 | 15-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 314 (career-high), the French player reached the qualifications after beating Petros Tsitsipas 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Tsitsipas (6-0 6-1). During the match, Van Assche scored 56 points vs Tsitsipas’s 24. Van Assche was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van Assche scored just 1 ace and he committed only 3 double faults. Luca Van Assche conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Van Assche put 73% of his first serves in, winning 92% (22/24) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (3/9) on the 2nd serve. Luca broke Tsitsipas 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Van Assche has a winning record in the last 3 years having won 58% of his matches (61-44). 21-11 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Van Assche has an overall35-20 win-loss record in the last 3 years on clay.
The French player best result of the year was getting to the final in M15+H Bagnoles de l’Orne.
Luca has a composed 28-18 win-loss record in 2022, 21-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Trieste Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-30 | 10-5 | 26-20 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-29 | 25-11 | 22-14 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-28 | 29-10 | 26-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-24 | 18-13 | 15-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 393 (career-high), Samuel reached the qualifications after defeating Manuel Mazza 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Vincent Ruggeri had a good straight sets win against Mazza (6-3 6-1). During the match Vincent Ruggeri scored 61 points vs Mazza’s 42. Vincent Ruggeri was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Vincent Ruggeri struck 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri was pretty efficient on serve to win 74% (23/31) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Samuel broke Mazza 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Vincent Ruggeri’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M15 Ulcinj and M25 Ulcinj.
The Italian has a compiled 41-19 win-loss record in 2022, 21-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van Assche | Vincent Ruggeri |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 16 |
| Pts | 56-24 | 61-42 |
| Total Points | 80 | 103 |
| Winners | 22 | 23 |
| %Winners | 39% | 38% |
Both Van Assche and Vincent Ruggeri played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van Assche and Vincent Ruggeri have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Van Assche played 3 games less than Vincent Ruggeri. Van Assche scored 22 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian blasted 23 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van Assche | Vincent Ruggeri |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
| 1st in | 24/33 | 31/54 |
| %1st in | 73% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 23/31 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 3/9 | 15/23 |
| %2nd pts | 33% | 65% |
Van Assche scored 1 ace . Vincent Ruggeri also managed to score 2 aces . Van Assche won 92% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 33% of the points. On the other side, Vincent Ruggeri won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van Assche | Vincent Ruggeri |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 55% | 67% |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Van Assche broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The French player pretty solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Italian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Van Assche | |||
| Q1 Tsitsipas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 56-24 | 56-24 | |
| Total points | 80 | 80 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 22/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Vincent Ruggeri | |||
| Q1 Mazza |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 61-42 | 61-42 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/54 | 31/54 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 23/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWLWLW
LWLWWLLLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aldin SetkicSetkic – Giovanni OradiniOradini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Federico GaioGaio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Andrej MartinMartin (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Gilles SimonSimon (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Dennis NovakNovak (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Andrey ChepelevChepelev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
