Arianne Hartono and Nao Hibino will fight against each other in the qualifications of the European Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on M4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nao Hibino who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nao Hibino is the pick to win this match.
Nao Hibino -> 1.9
Arianne Hartono -> 1.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Arianne Hartono vs. Nao Hibino
There is no head to head record between Arianne Hartono and Nao Hibino since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Arianne Hartono
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-32 | 16-19 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-28 | 32-24 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-36 | 49-29 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-27 | 8-13 | 7-8 | 7-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 48-28 | 12-5 | 23-15 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 166, the Dutch got to the qualifications after defeating Sinja Kraus 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Kraus (6-2 6-1). During the match, Hartono scored 60 points vs Kraus’s 42. Hartono was exceptionally aggressive to blast 15 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hartono scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and she committed only 2 double faults. Arianne Hartono lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Hartono put 57% of her first serves in, winning 63% (15/24) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (8/18) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Kraus 7 times after converting 58% of her break points (7/12).
Hartono has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 61% of her matches (145-94). 5-6 on clay in 2022. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Hartono has a compiled49-33 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Dutch has an aggregate 12-15 win-loss record in 2022, 5-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Hamburg
The Dutch has never competed in this tournament before.
Nao Hibino
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-26 | 15-13 | 10-11 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-32 | 21-21 | 2-7 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-30 | 26-19 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 26-19 | 7-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-21 | 1-9 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 264, Hibino reached the qualifications after defeating Ysaline Bonaventure 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Hibino had a good straight sets win against Bonaventure (6-3 6-3). During the match Hibino scored 75 points vs Bonaventure’s 55. Hibino was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Hibino fired 3 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Nao Hibino lost the serve 3 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Hibino put 57% of her first serves in, winning 63% (19/30) of the points behind her 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Bonaventure 6 times after converting 40% of her break points (6/15).
Hibino’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the W25 Chiang Rai.
Nao has a compiled 18-16 win-loss record in 2022, 6-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Hamburg
Nao has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hartono | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 |
| Pts | 60-42 | 75-55 |
| Total Points | 102 | 130 |
| Winners | 15 | 19 |
| %Winners | 25% | 25% |
Both Hartono and Hibino played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Hartono and Hibino have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Hartono played 3 games less than Hibino. Arianne scored 15 winners (25% of the total points). On the other side, Nao made 19 winners (25%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hartono | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 24/42 | 30/53 |
| %1st in | 57% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 15/24 | 19/30 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 8/18 | 14/23 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 61% |
Hartono scored 1 ace . Hibino also struck 3 aces . Hartono won 63% points on her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Hibino won 63% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hartono | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/12 | 6/15 |
| % Converted | 58% | 40% |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The Dutch broke her opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Arianne surrendered her serve twice and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded. The Japanese broke her opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded.
| Hartono | |||
| Q1 Kraus |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-42 | 60-42 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 25% | 25% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/42 | 24/42 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/18 | 8/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Hibino | |||
| Q1 Bonaventure |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 75-55 | 75-55 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 25% | 25% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/53 | 30/53 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 14/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWWLWL
LWWLLLWWWW Tennis Scores in Hamburg
- Jeson PatrombonPatrombon – Roy HobbsHobbs (7-66 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kateryna KozlovaKozlova – Sabine LisickiLisicki (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia GasanovaGasanova – Joanne ZugerZuger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Arianne HartonoHartono (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Alexandra CadantuCadantu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Suzan LamensLamens – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Rebecca PetersonPeterson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – Andrea PetkovicPetkovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Magdalena FrechFrech (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandra KrunicKrunic – Dalma GalfiGalfi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Laura PigossiPigossi (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Darya KasatkinaKasatkina (0-4) – H2H and prediction
