Norbert Gombos and Pol Martin Tiffon will face off in the quarter of the Salzburg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Norbert Gombos who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Norbert Gombos is the pick to win this match.
Norbert Gombos -> 1.53
Pol Martin Tiffon -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Norbert Gombos vs. Pol Martin Tiffon
There is no head to head record between Norbert Gombos and Pol Martin Tiffon since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Norbert Gombos
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-20 | 13-3 | 10-13 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 18-23 | 2-4 | 11-10 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-28 | 7-3 | 28-17 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 26-30 | 0-9 | 13-10 | 12-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 18-11 | 6-4 | 2-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 124, Norbert reached the quarter after defeating Luca Nardi 5-7 7-5 6-2 and Giulio Zeppieri 7-5 7-60.
In the 2nd round, The Slovakian had a good straight sets win against Zeppieri (7-5 7-60). During the match, Gombos scored 83 points vs Zeppieri’s 68. Gombos was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gombos struck 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Norbert Gombos lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Gombos put 60% of his first serves in, winning 76% (31/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The Slovakian broke Zeppieri 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Slovakian has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Gombos has a favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (351-276). 15-9 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gombos has an aggregate 150-107 record in the last years on clay.
The Slovakian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Murcia Challenger.
Gombos has an aggregate 19-15 win-loss record in 2022, 15-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salzburg Challenger
Norbert has never competed in this tournament before.
Pol Martin Tiffon
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 52-23 | 4-2 | 48-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-25 | 5-2 | 30-20 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-20 | 0-1 | 38-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 39-27 | 0-0 | 39-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 15-12 | 0-1 | 15-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 289 (career-high), Pol reached the quarter after beating Neil Oberleitner 6-2 6-2, Lucas Miedler 6-4 3-6 6-0 and Jiri Lehecka 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Pol had a good straight sets win against Lehecka (6-4 6-4). During the match Martin scored 61 points vs Lehecka’s 52. The Spaniard was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Martin fired 2 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Pol Martin Tiffon was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Pol broke Lehecka 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Pol started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Pol’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Vic,M25 Mataro and M25 Grasse.
The Spaniard has a composed 30-14 win-loss record in 2022, 30-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gombos | Martin |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 3 |
Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
Tot Games | 57 | 61 |
Pts | 183-162 | 207-155 |
Total Points | 345 | 362 |
Winners | 77 | 76 |
%Winners | 42% | 37% |
Gombos played 2 matches while Martin competed in 3 matches. Martin started his run from the qualifications while Gombos had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Norbert Gombos surrendered 1 set, while Pol Martin Tiffon dropped 1 set. Gombos has played 2 set(s) less than Martin (5 vs 7). Therefore, Gombos played 4 games less than Martin. Gombos scored 77 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Martin managed to score 76 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gombos | Martin |
---|---|---|
Aces | 12 | 21 |
Avg per match | 6 | 7 |
1st in | 102/171 | 98/169 |
%1st in | 60% | 58% |
1st pts | 77/102 | 76/98 |
%1st pts | 75% | 78% |
2nd pts | 35/69 | 44/71 |
%2nd pts | 51% | 62% |
Gombos blasted 12 aces (6 per match). Martin managed to score 21 aces (7 per match). Gombos won 75% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Martin won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gombos | Martin |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 12 |
Converted | 8/17 | 12/19 |
% Converted | 47% | 63% |
Conceded | 12 | 10 |
Saved | 7 | 7 |
% Saved | 58% | 70% |
Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
Gombos broke his opponents 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. The Slovakian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. Martin broke his opponents 12 times with a 63% conversion rate. Pol conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
Gombos | ||||
R1 Nardi |
R2 Zeppieri |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | 7-5 7-60 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 25 | 57 | |
pts | 100-94 | 83-68 | 183-162 | |
Total points | 194 | 151 | 345 | |
Winners | 46 | 31 | 77 | |
%Winners | 46% | 37% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
1st in | 61/103 | 41/68 | 102/171 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 46/61 | 31/41 | 77/102 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 76% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 22/42 | 13/27 | 35/69 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 48% | 51% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/10 | 8/17 | |
Converted % | 57% | 40% | 47% | |
Conceded | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
Saved | 6/8 | 1/4 | 7 | |
Saved % | 75% | 25% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Martin | ||||||
Q1 Oberleitner |
Q3 Gakhov |
R1 Miedler |
R2 Lehecka |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | 7-63 6-1 | 6-4 3-6 6-0 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 20 | 25 | 20 | 81 | |
pts | 65-40 | – | 81-63 | 61-52 | 207-155 | |
Total points | 105 | 0 | 144 | 113 | 362 | |
Winners | 18 | 34 | 24 | 76 | ||
%Winners | 28% | 0% | 42% | 39% | 37% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 7 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 21 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 | ||
1st in | 21/45 | / | 44/69 | 33/55 | 98/169 | |
% 1st in | 47% | 0% | 64% | 60% | 58% | |
1st pts | 18/21 | / | 34/44 | 24/33 | 76/98 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 0% | 77% | 73% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 17/24 | / | 13/25 | 14/22 | 44/71 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 0% | 52% | 64% | 62% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 4 | 5 | 3 | 12 | ||
Converted | 4/8 | / | 5/6 | 3/5 | 12/19 | |
Converted % | 50% | 0% | 83% | 60% | 63% | |
Conceded | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | ||
Saved | 1/1 | 0/ | 2/4 | 4/5 | 7 | |
Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | 80% | 115% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Dominic ThiemThiem (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Dusan LajovicLajovic (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction