Filip Horansky and Hamad Medjedovic will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 6:15 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamad Medjedovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hamad Medjedovic is the pick to win this match.
Hamad Medjedovic -> 1.615
Filip Horansky -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Filip Horansky vs. Hamad Medjedovic
This will be the 2nd time that Filip Horansky and Hamad Medjedovic face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Horansky (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Horansky won 6-4 6-7(2) 6-1 in the qualifications in Umag back in 2021.
Filip Horansky
14 - 18win/loss
346
161
LWLWLLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 19-30 | 3-3 | 8-15 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 27-29 | 1-2 | 20-18 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-17 | 1-2 | 15-13 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 34-33 | 1-3 | 24-16 | 9-10 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 48-27 | 0-0 | 38-19 | 8-6 | 2-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 191, the Slovakian got to the 2nd round after beating Rudolf Molleker 7-64 6-2.
In the 1st round, Horansky had a good straight sets win against Molleker (7-64 6-2). During the match, Horansky scored 79 points vs Molleker’s 63. Filip was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Horansky bagged 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Filip Horansky was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 74% (28/38) of his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Horansky broke Molleker 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Horansky has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (372-256). 5-7 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Horansky has an aggregate 270-147 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Filip’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Biel Challenger and the Prostejov Challenger.
Filip has a composed 14-17 win-loss record in 2022, 5-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Filip has never competed in this tournament before.
Hamad Medjedovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-21 | 6-6 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-21 | 9-6 | 15-8 | 9-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 395, Hamad got to the 2nd round after beating Leopold Zima 6-1 6-0, Martin Krumich 6-3 6-0 and Vitaliy Sachko 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Medjedovic had a good straight sets win against Sachko (6-3 6-3). During the match Medjedovic scored 61 points vs Sachko’s 44. Medjedovic was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Medjedovic bagged 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Hamad Medjedovic lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Medjedovic put 63% of his first serves in, winning 76% (25/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Medjedovic was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Sachko 5 times.
The Serbian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Antalya and M25 Ulcinj.
Medjedovic has an overall 37-10 win-loss record in 2022, 24-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Horansky | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 46 |
| Pts | 79-63 | 171-105 |
| Total Points | 142 | 276 |
| Winners | 28 | 70 |
| %Winners | 35% | 41% |
Horansky played 1 match while Medjedovic competed in 3 matches. Medjedovic started his run from the qualifications while Horansky had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Horansky has played 4 set(s) less than Medjedovic (2 vs 6). Therefore, Horansky played 25 games less than Medjedovic. The Slovakian scored 28 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Hamad bagged 70 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Horansky | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
| 1st in | 38/64 | 99/152 |
| %1st in | 59% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 70/99 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 29/53 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 55% |
Horansky recorded 8 aces . Medjedovic bagged 12 aces (4 per match). Horansky won 74% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Medjedovic won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Horansky | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 15 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 15/17 |
| % Converted | 44% | 88% |
| Conceded | 5 | 9 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 60% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Horansky broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Filip surrendered his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Hamad broke his opponents 15 times with a 88% conversion rate. Hamad conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Horansky | |||
| R1 Molleker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 79-63 | 79-63 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 38/64 | 38/64 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Medjedovic | |||||
| Q1 Zima |
Q3 Krumich |
R1 Sachko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-3 6-0 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 15 | 18 | 46 | |
| pts | 52-28 | 58-33 | 61-44 | 171-105 | |
| Total points | 80 | 91 | 105 | 276 | |
| Winners | 24 | 21 | 25 | 70 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 36% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 5 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 33/46 | 33/54 | 33/52 | 99/152 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 61% | 63% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 21/33 | 25/33 | 70/99 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 64% | 76% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 13/21 | 9/19 | 29/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 62% | 47% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | 5/5 | 15/17 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | 100% | 88% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2/3 | 2/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 50% | 217% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLLWLL Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Manuel GuinardGuinard (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Robin HaaseHaase – Marko TopoTopo (7-62 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (4-6 6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robin HaaseHaase – Jozef KovalikKovalik (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Timo StodderStodder (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (1-0) – H2H and prediction
