Andrea Basso and Inigo Cervantes will square off in the qualifications of the Milan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 13. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Inigo Cervantes who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Inigo Cervantes is the pick to win this match.
Inigo Cervantes -> 1.88
Andrea Basso -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andrea Basso vs. Inigo Cervantes
There is no head to head record between Andrea Basso and Inigo Cervantes since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Andrea Basso
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 16-20 | 6-8 | 10-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 20-21 | 0-0 | 19-20 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 6-3 | 5-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 21-19 | 2-1 | 19-16 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2018 | 25-23 | 3-2 | 17-14 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 2-3 |
Ranked no. 624, Andrea got to the qualifications after beating Martin Krumich 7-64 7-63.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Krumich (7-64 7-63). During the match, Basso scored 88 points vs Krumich’s 81. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Basso scored 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Andrea Basso lost the serve 5 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Basso put 65% of his first serves in, winning 57% (30/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the 2nd serve. Andrea broke Krumich 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Basso has a positive match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (252-189). 1-1 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Basso has an aggregate 196-136 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Basso has a composed 7-9 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Inigo Cervantes
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 5-2 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 12-14 | 0-2 | 12-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 8-4 | 7-2 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 873, will start his run in the Milan Challenger after he played his last match in the Milan Challenger where he beat 6-4 6-2 to Catarina in the qualifications on the 19th of June.
Cervantes has a compiled 3-4 win-loss record in 2022, 3-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
In terms of his career, Inigo has an overall 413-304 record. He has a positive 335-229 record on clay.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Basso | Cervantes |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 26 | 18 |
Pts | 88-81 | 77-62 |
Total Points | 169 | 139 |
Winners | 30 | 25 |
%Winners | 34% | 32% |
Both Basso and Cervantes played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Basso and Cervantes have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Basso played 8 games more than Cervantes. The Italian scored 30 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Cervantes made 25 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Basso | Cervantes |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 6 |
Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
1st in | 53/82 | 30/63 |
%1st in | 65% | 48% |
1st pts | 30/53 | 25/30 |
%1st pts | 57% | 83% |
2nd pts | 16/29 | 15/33 |
%2nd pts | 55% | 45% |
Basso managed to score 2 aces . Cervantes blasted 6 aces . Basso won 57% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Cervantes won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Basso | Cervantes |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 4 |
Converted | 5/9 | 4/13 |
% Converted | 56% | 31% |
Conceded | 9 | 7 |
Saved | 4 | 6 |
% Saved | 44% | 86% |
Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
Andrea broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Andrea dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 44% of the break points that he conceded. Inigo broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Inigo conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
Basso | |||
Q1 Krumich |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
pts | 88-81 | 88-81 | |
Total points | 169 | 169 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 53/82 | 53/82 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 30/53 | 30/53 | |
% 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
2nd pts | 16/29 | 16/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 4/9 | 4 | |
Saved % | 44% | 44% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Cervantes | |||
Total | |||
---|---|---|---|
Score | |||
Tot Set | 0 | ||
Tot Games | 0 | ||
pts | 0-0 | ||
Total points | 0 | ||
Winners | 0 | ||
%Winners | 0% | ||
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | ||
Double Faults | 0 | ||
1st in | 0/0 | ||
% 1st in | 0% | ||
1st pts | 0/0 | ||
% 1st pts | 0% | ||
2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
% 2nd pts | 0% | ||
Breaks | |||
Won | 0 | ||
Converted | 0/0 | ||
Converted % | 0% | ||
Conceded | 0 | ||
Saved | 0 | ||
Saved % | 0% | ||
Times Broken | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aldin SetkicSetkic – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Julian LenzLenz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea BassoBasso – Inigo CervantesCervantes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Benoit PairePaire (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Pedja KrstinKrstin (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Giovanni OradiniOradini (0-0) – H2H and prediction