
Dane Sweeny and Martin Damm will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Orlando Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Damm who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Martin Damm is the pick to win this match.
Martin Damm -> 1.52
Dane Sweeny -> 2.46
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dane Sweeny vs. Martin Damm
There is no head to head record between Dane Sweeny and Martin Damm since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Dane Sweeny
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 78-26 | 71-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 18-26 | 18-19 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-33 | 25-23 | 10-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 62-26 | 59-22 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-23 | 19-15 | 1-1 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 399, the Australian reached the qualifications after beating Donald Young 3-6 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications against Young, Sweeny recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-3). During the match, Sweeny scored 109 points vs Young’s 102. Dane was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sweeny scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Dane Sweeny lost the serve 5 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Sweeny put 56% of his first serves in, winning 60% (37/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (25/48) on the 2nd serve. Sweeny broke Young 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Sweeny has a winning record in the last 5 years having won 55% of his matches (71-58). 21-9 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sweeny has an aggregate55-37 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
Dane’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Canberra.
Sweeny has a compiled 24-11 win-loss record in 2022, 21-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orlando Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Martin Damm
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52-20 | 36-13 | 0-2 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 15-20 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 582, Damm got to the qualifications after beating Nicolas Alvarez 5-7 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications against Alvarez, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 6-4). During the match Damm scored 92 points vs Alvarez’s 89. Damm was pretty aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Damm scored 7 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Martin Damm was very effective on serve to win 77% (40/52) of his 1st serve and 56% (22/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Damm broke Alvarez 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Martin’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Jablonec nad Nisou.
The American has an aggregate 18-12 win-loss record in 2022, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orlando Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sweeny | Damm |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 32 |
| Pts | 109-102 | 92-89 |
| Total Points | 211 | 181 |
| Winners | 37 | 40 |
| %Winners | 34% | 43% |
Both Sweeny and Damm played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Dane Sweeny dropped 1 set, while Martin Damm dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Sweeny and Damm have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Sweeny played 2 games less than Damm. The Australian scored 37 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Martin managed to score 40 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sweeny | Damm |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 7 |
| 1st in | 62/110 | 52/91 |
| %1st in | 56% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 37/62 | 40/52 |
| %1st pts | 60% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 25/48 | 22/39 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 56% |
Sweeny scored 1 ace . Damm also managed to score 7 aces . Sweeny won 60% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Damm won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sweeny | Damm |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 55% | 33% |
| Conceded | 16 | 4 |
| Saved | 11 | 2 |
| % Saved | 69% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Damm broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Martin conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sweeny | |||
| Q1 Young |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 109-102 | 109-102 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 62/110 | 62/110 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 37/62 | 37/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/48 | 25/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
| Saved | 11/16 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Damm | |||
| Q1 Alvarez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 92-89 | 92-89 | |
| Total points | 181 | 181 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 52/91 | 52/91 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 40/52 | 40/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/39 | 22/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWWLW
LWWWWLWWLW Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras – Keegan SmithSmith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Malek JaziriJaziri – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Andrew HarrisHarris (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Matija PecoticPecotic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Yibing WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Christopher EubanksEubanks (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Ergi KirkinKirkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gilbert Soares Klier JuniorSoares Klier Junior – (0-0) – H2H and prediction








