Ulrikke Eikeri and Nadiya Kichenok will play each other in the 1st round of the Credit One Charleston Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on Court 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ulrikke Eikeri who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ulrikke Eikeri is the pick to win this match.
Ulrikke Eikeri -> 1.444
Nadiya Kichenok -> 2.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ulrikke Eikeri vs. Nadiya Kichenok
There is no head to head record between Ulrikke Eikeri and Nadiya Kichenok since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Ulrikke Eikeri
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 8-19 | 3-7 | 3-9 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 11-15 | 2-6 | 3-3 | 6-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 15-24 | 3-4 | 9-12 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 5-7 | 2-1 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 283, the Norwegian got to the 1st round after defeating Demi Schuurs 6-1 6-0 and Heather Watson 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Ulrikke had a good straight sets win against Watson (6-4 6-4). During the match, Eikeri scored 70 points vs Watson’s 63. Eikeri was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Eikeri scored 2 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Ulrikke Eikeri lost the serve twice and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Eikeri put 56% of her first serves in, winning 70% (26/37) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. Eikeri broke Watson 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Norwegian started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 57% of the points she played.
Eikeri has a good record in the last 10 years having won 59% of her matches (276-192). 2-0 on clay in 2022. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Eikeri has a composed 165-104 record in the last years on clay.
Ulrikke has an aggregate 5-5 win-loss record in 2022, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Nadiya Kichenok
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 3-4 | 1-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 898, the Ukrainian got to the 1st round after beating Christina Mchale 6-3 4-6 6-4 and Catherine Harrison 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, Nadiya had a good straight sets win against Harrison (6-1 6-0). During the match Kichenok scored 55 points vs Harrison’s 25. The Ukrainian was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Kichenok struck 4 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Nadiya Kichenok conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Kichenok put 77% of her first serves in, winning 79% (26/33) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (5/10) on the 2nd serve. Nadiya broke Harrison 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Ukrainian started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points she played.
The Ukrainian has a compiled 2-0 win-loss record in 2022, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Eikeri | Kichenok |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
Tot Games | 33 | 42 |
Pts | 127-94 | 155-118 |
Total Points | 221 | 273 |
Winners | 46 | 65 |
%Winners | 36% | 42% |
Both Eikeri and Kichenok played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Nadiya Kichenok dropped 1 set while Ulrikke Eikeri hasn’t dropped a set so far. Eikeri has played 1 set(s) less than Kichenok (4 vs 5). Therefore, Eikeri played 9 games less than Kichenok. Ulrikke scored 46 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Kichenok scored 65 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Eikeri | Kichenok |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 11 |
Avg per match | 1 | 5.5 |
1st in | 65/109 | 98/144 |
%1st in | 60% | 68% |
1st pts | 46/65 | 65/98 |
%1st pts | 71% | 66% |
2nd pts | 19/44 | 23/46 |
%2nd pts | 43% | 50% |
Eikeri bagged 2 aces (1 per match). Kichenok blasted 11 aces (5.5 per match). Eikeri won 71% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Kichenok won 66% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Eikeri | Kichenok |
---|---|---|
Won | 11 | 11 |
Converted | 11/18 | 11/19 |
% Converted | 61% | 58% |
Conceded | 13 | 13 |
Saved | 10 | 8 |
% Saved | 77% | 62% |
Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
The Norwegian broke her opponents 11 times with a 61% conversion rate. Eikeri surrendered her serve 3 times and she saved 77% of the break points that she conceded. Kichenok broke her opponents 11 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Ukrainian conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 62% of the break points that she conceded.
Eikeri | ||||
Q1 Schuurs |
Q3 Watson |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 13 | 20 | 33 | |
pts | 57-31 | 70-63 | 127-94 | |
Total points | 88 | 133 | 221 | |
Winners | 20 | 26 | 46 | |
%Winners | 35% | 37% | 36% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
1st in | 28/43 | 37/66 | 65/109 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 56% | 60% | |
1st pts | 20/28 | 26/37 | 46/65 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 70% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 6/15 | 13/29 | 19/44 | |
% 2nd pts | 40% | 45% | 43% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
Converted | 7/11 | 4/7 | 11/18 | |
Converted % | 64% | 57% | 61% | |
Conceded | 6 | 7 | 13 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 5/7 | 10 | |
Saved % | 83% | 71% | 77% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Kichenok | ||||
Q1 Mchale |
Q3 Harrison |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 13 | 42 | |
pts | 100-93 | 55-25 | 155-118 | |
Total points | 193 | 80 | 273 | |
Winners | 39 | 26 | 65 | |
%Winners | 39% | 47% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
1st in | 65/101 | 33/43 | 98/144 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 77% | 68% | |
1st pts | 39/65 | 26/33 | 65/98 | |
% 1st pts | 60% | 79% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 18/36 | 5/10 | 23/46 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
Converted | 6/10 | 5/9 | 11/19 | |
Converted % | 60% | 56% | 58% | |
Conceded | 11 | 2 | 13 | |
Saved | 6/11 | 2/2 | 8 | |
Saved % | 55% | 100% | 78% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Rogerio Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Miljan ZekicZekic (6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrey RublevRublev – Carlos BerlocqBerlocq (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Benoit PairePaire (6-2 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-73 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Mikhail YouzhnyYouzhny (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrej MartinMartin – Denis IstominIstomin (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Attila BalazsBalazs – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-3 0-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Aljaz BedeneBedene – Joao SousaSousa (6-3 4-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Norbert GombosGombos (6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ivan DodigDodig – Marius CopilCopil (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Gilles SimonSimon (6-1 3-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alison RiskeRiske – Caty McNallyMcNally (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Robin AndersonAnderson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison KeysKeys – Anastasia GasanovaGasanova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze – Lauren DavisDavis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriela TalabaTalaba – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emma NavarroNavarro – Madison BrengleBrengle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Irina-Camelia BeguBegu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sophie ChangChang – Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alize CornetCornet – Alycia ParksParks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Katie VolynetsVolynets (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shelby RogersRogers – Kaia KanepiKanepi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Petra KvitovaKvitova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Qinwen ZhengZheng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Allie KiickKiick – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Yue YuanYuan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulrikke EikeriEikeri – Nadiya KichenokKichenok (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Belinda BencicBencic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Claire LiuLiu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Anna BondarBondar (1-2) – H2H and prediction