Elmar Ejupovic and Kyle Seelig will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Mexico City Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on ESTADIO. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elmar Ejupovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elmar Ejupovic is the pick to win this match.
Elmar Ejupovic -> 1.63
Kyle Seelig -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elmar Ejupovic vs. Kyle Seelig
There is no head to head record between Elmar Ejupovic and Kyle Seelig since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Elmar Ejupovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-17 | 7-5 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2024 | 34-27 | 7-5 | 19-12 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 30-34 | 4-7 | 16-17 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2022 | 46-28 | 4-2 | 32-19 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2021 | 34-25 | 1-2 | 23-17 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 450, Ejupovic got to the qualifications after defeating Manuel Sanchez 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Elmar had a good straight sets win against Sanchez (6-3 6-3). During the match, Ejupovic scored 64 points vs Sanchez’s 48. Elmar was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ejupovic made 10 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Elmar Ejupovic lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Ejupovic put 60% of his first serves in, winning 69% (24/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the 2nd serve. Elmar broke Sanchez 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Ejupovic has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (274-196). 4-3 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ejupovic has an aggregate120-97 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
The German has an aggregate 7-7 win-loss record in 2022, 4-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mexico City Challenger
Elmar has never competed in this tournament before.
Kyle Seelig
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1-9 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-11 | 8-6 | 3-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-25 | 32-20 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 50-17 | 47-15 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 550 (career-high), the American reached the qualifications after beating Mohamed Safwat 3-6 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications against Safwat, Kyle recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Seelig scored 88 points vs Safwat’s 80. Kyle was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Seelig scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Kyle Seelig lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Seelig put 71% of his first serves in, winning 67% (40/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (13/25) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Safwat 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Seelig’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Medellin.
Seelig has a compiled 6-5 win-loss record in 2022, 4-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ejupovic | Seelig |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 26 |
| Pts | 64-48 | 88-80 |
| Total Points | 112 | 168 |
| Winners | 24 | 40 |
| %Winners | 38% | 45% |
Both Ejupovic and Seelig played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Kyle Seelig lost 1 set while Elmar Ejupovic hasn’t lost a set so far. Ejupovic has played 1 set(s) less than Seelig (2 vs 3). Therefore, Ejupovic played 8 games less than Seelig. Ejupovic scored 24 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 40 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ejupovic | Seelig |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 1 |
| 1st in | 35/58 | 60/85 |
| %1st in | 60% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 24/35 | 40/60 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 13/25 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 52% |
Ejupovic managed to score 10 aces . Seelig scored 1 ace . Ejupovic won 69% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Seelig won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ejupovic | Seelig |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 71% | 57% |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The German broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The German dropped his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Seelig broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Seelig conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ejupovic | |||
| Q1 Sanchez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 64-48 | 64-48 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 35/58 | 35/58 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 24/35 | 24/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Seelig | |||
| Q1 Safwat |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 88-80 | 88-80 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 60/85 | 60/85 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 40/60 | 40/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/25 | 13/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLLLWW
LWLLLLLLLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrej MartinMartin – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Nick ChappellChappell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Bernard TomicTomic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle SeeligSeelig – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Nicolas BarrientosBarrientos (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gilbert Soares Klier JuniorSoares Klier Junior – Jakub PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
