Adrian Menendez-Maceiras and Georgii Kravchenko will square off in the qualifications of the Biel Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Georgii Kravchenko who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Georgii Kravchenko is the pick to win this match.
Georgii Kravchenko -> 1.45
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras -> 2.67
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adrian Menendez-Maceiras vs. Georgii Kravchenko
There is no head to head record between Adrian Menendez-Maceiras and Georgii Kravchenko since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-19 | 13-8 | 6-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-24 | 12-10 | 2-11 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-9 | 3-4 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 25-32 | 8-13 | 9-6 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 348, the Spaniard reached the qualifications after beating Beibit Zhukayev 3-6 7-65 7-64.
In the qualifications against Zhukayev, Adrian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 7-64). During the match, Menendez-Maceiras scored 115 points vs Zhukayev’s 114. The Spaniard was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Menendez-Maceiras managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Adrian Menendez-Maceiras lost the serve 5 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Menendez-Maceiras put 56% of his first serves in, winning 70% (40/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (22/45) on the 2nd serve. Adrian broke Zhukayev 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Menendez-Maceiras has a good record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (274-240). 1-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Menendez-Maceiras has an overall 23-35 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Menendez-Maceiras has a composed 1-3 win-loss record in 2022, 1-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biel Challenger
Adrian has never competed in this tournament before.
Georgii Kravchenko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 54-29 | 44-20 | 10-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 18-13 | 10-6 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-30 | 8-9 | 30-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-28 | 3-2 | 24-22 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 46-30 | 2-2 | 38-25 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 425, the Ukrainian got to the qualifications after defeating Tim Handel 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Handel (6-1 7-5). During the match Kravchenko scored 62 points vs Handel’s 41. Georgii was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Kravchenko fired 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Georgii Kravchenko was very efficient on serve to win 88% (23/26) of his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kravchenko broke Handel 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
The Ukrainian has an aggregate 5-4 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Menendez-Maceiras | Kravchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 19 |
| Pts | 115-114 | 62-41 |
| Total Points | 229 | 103 |
| Winners | 40 | 23 |
| %Winners | 35% | 37% |
Both Menendez-Maceiras and Kravchenko played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Adrian Menendez-Maceiras dropped 1 set while Georgii Kravchenko hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Menendez-Maceiras has played 1 set more than Kravchenko (3 vs 2). Therefore, Menendez-Maceiras played 16 games more than Kravchenko. The Spaniard scored 40 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Ukrainian managed to score 23 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Menendez-Maceiras | Kravchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 57/102 | 26/49 |
| %1st in | 56% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 40/57 | 23/26 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 88% |
| 2nd pts | 22/45 | 14/23 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 61% |
Menendez-Maceiras fired 5 aces . Kravchenko recorded 5 aces . Menendez-Maceiras won 70% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Kravchenko won 88% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Menendez-Maceiras | Kravchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 40% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 29% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
Menendez-Maceiras broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Spaniard lost his serve 5 times and he saved 29% of the break points that he conceded. Kravchenko broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Kravchenko conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Menendez-Maceiras | |||
| Q1 Zhukayev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-65 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 115-114 | 115-114 | |
| Total points | 229 | 229 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 57/102 | 57/102 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 40/57 | 40/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/45 | 22/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/7 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 29% | 29% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Kravchenko | |||
| Q1 Handel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 62-41 | 62-41 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/49 | 26/49 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 23/26 | 23/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 14/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLWWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuichi SugitaSugita – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Dennis NovakNovak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Daniel MasurMasur (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Brayden SchnurSchnur (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Dan AddedAdded (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Ryan PenistonPeniston (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Go SoedaSoeda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – David PoljakPoljak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
