![Prediction And Head To Head Madison Brengle Vs. Astra Sharma Cz5yb1zkqt Prediction and head to head Madison Brengle vs. Astra Sharma](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Madison-Brengle-vs.-Astra-Sharma-cz5yb1ZkQT.jpg)
Madison Brengle and Astra Sharma will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Dubai Duty Free Championships for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 10:30 am on Court 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Madison Brengle who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Madison Brengle is the pick to win this match.
Madison Brengle -> 1.59
Astra Sharma -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Madison Brengle vs. Astra Sharma
This will be the 2nd time that Madison Brengle and Astra Sharma square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Sharma (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Sharma won 6-4 4-6 7-5 in the 2nd round in Charleston back in 2021.
Madison Brengle
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 26-26 | 16-15 | 4-3 | 3-3 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-26 | 30-14 | 5-6 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-25 | 18-13 | 8-7 | 7-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-11 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 31-25 | 17-12 | 6-7 | 3-2 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 59, Madison got to the qualifications after defeating Amanda Anisimova 7-5 7-65.
In the qualifications, Madison had a good straight sets win against Anisimova (7-5 7-65).During the match, Brengle scored less points (1) than Anisimova. In fact, the world no. 59 won 85 points vs Anisimova’s. That means that Brengle was more focused during the important points. The American was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Brengle couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and she committed only 2 double faults. Madison Brengle lost the serve 4 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Brengle put 76% of her first serves in, winning 59% (41/70) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (8/22) on the 2nd serve. Brengle broke Anisimova 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Brengle has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 60% of her matches (321-218). 5-3 on hard in 2022. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Brengle has an aggregate 181-115 record in the last years on hard.
Madison has an overall 5-3 win-loss record in 2022, 5-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Dubai
Astra Sharma
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 10-19 | 2-5 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 42-20 | 16-8 | 25-11 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 19-26 | 11-18 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-21 | 11-9 | 11-7 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-12 | 5-8 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 91, Astra reached the qualifications after beating Oceane Dodin 3-6 7-65 7-5.
In the qualifications against Dodin, Astra recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 7-5). During the match Sharma scored 117 points vs Dodin’s 116. Astra was very aggressive to blast 44 winners.
About the serving games, Sharma buried her opponent with 20 aces and she was not very consistent on her 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Astra Sharma lost the serve 4 times and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Sharma put 56% of her first serves in, winning 72% (44/61) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (24/48) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Dodin 4 times after converting 36% of her break points (4/11).
The Australian has a compiled 1-3 win-loss record in 2022, 1-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Brengle | Sharma |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 25 | 34 |
Pts | 85-86 | 117-116 |
Total Points | 171 | 233 |
Winners | 41 | 44 |
%Winners | 48% | 38% |
Both Brengle and Sharma played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Astra Sharma dropped 1 set while Madison Brengle hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Brengle has played 1 set(s) less than Sharma (2 vs 3). Therefore, Brengle played 9 games less than Sharma. The American scored 41 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Astra struck 44 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Brengle | Sharma |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 20 |
Avg per match | 0 | 20 |
1st in | 70/92 | 61/109 |
%1st in | 76% | 56% |
1st pts | 41/70 | 44/61 |
%1st pts | 59% | 72% |
2nd pts | 8/22 | 24/48 |
%2nd pts | 36% | 50% |
Brengle didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sharma made 20 aces . Brengle won 59% points behind her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Sharma won 72% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Brengle | Sharma |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 4 |
Converted | 5/8 | 4/11 |
% Converted | 63% | 36% |
Conceded | 9 | 5 |
Saved | 5 | 1 |
% Saved | 56% | 20% |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Brengle broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The American lost her serve 4 times and she saved 56% of the break points that she conceded. Astra broke her opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Sharma conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 20% of the break points that she conceded.
Brengle | |||
Q1 Anisimova |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 85-86 | 85-86 | |
Total points | 171 | 171 | |
Winners | 41 | 41 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 70/92 | 70/92 | |
% 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
1st pts | 41/70 | 41/70 | |
% 1st pts | 59% | 59% | |
2nd pts | 8/22 | 8/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Sharma | |||
Q1 Dodin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 7-65 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
pts | 117-116 | 117-116 | |
Total points | 233 | 233 | |
Winners | 44 | 44 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 20 | 20 | |
Double Faults | 10 | 10 | |
1st in | 61/109 | 61/109 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 44/61 | 44/61 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 24/48 | 24/48 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 1/5 | 1 | |
Saved % | 20% | 20% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Dubai
- Diane ParryParry – Ulrikke EikeriEikeri (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Harriet DartDart – Sarah BehbehaniBehbehani (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Maddison InglisInglis – Sara ErraniErrani (7-64 7-61) – See score progression
- Claire LiuLiu – Stefanie VoegeleVoegele (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Bernarda PeraPera (6-3 3-6 7-62) – See score progression
- Heather WatsonWatson – Ekaterina YashinaYashina (6-3 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova – Kristina KucovaKucova (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Ellen PerezPerez (6-4 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Ena ShibaharaShibahara (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Anastasia GasanovaGasanova (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Anna DanilinaDanilina (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Kristina MladenovicMladenovic (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Clara TausonTauson – Anna BondarBondar (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Ann LiLi (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Giuliana OlmosOlmos (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Aleksandra KrunicKrunic (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Lin ZhuZhu (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Kirsten FlipkensFlipkens – Diana MarcinkevicaMarcinkevica (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Shuai ZhangZhang (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Astra SharmaSharma – Oceane DodinDodin (3-6 7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Eri HozumiHozumi (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Jaqueline CristianCristian (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Magda LinetteLinette – Angelina GabuevaGabueva (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Jared DonaldsonDonaldson (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (6-1 6-72 6-2) – See score progression
- Jeremy ChardyChardy – Edward CorrieCorrie (6-4 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (6-3 3-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (6-74 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Denis KudlaKudla (5-7 7-67 6-2) – See score progression
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Aleksandra KrunicKrunic (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Kirsten FlipkensFlipkens – Diana MarcinkevicaMarcinkevica (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Jaqueline CristianCristian (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Lin ZhuZhu (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Magda LinetteLinette – Angelina GabuevaGabueva (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Heather WatsonWatson – Ekaterina YashinaYashina (6-3 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Kirsten FlipkensFlipkens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Madison BrengleBrengle (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Harriet DartDart (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Diane ParryParry – Marta KostyukKostyuk (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Magda LinetteLinette (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Claire LiuLiu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Heather WatsonWatson (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Sofia KeninKenin – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Iga SwiatekSwiatek (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alison RiskeRiske – Simona HalepHalep (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Cori GauffGauff – Jessica PegulaPegula (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Ons JabeurJabeur (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova (1-2) – H2H and prediction