Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Paul Jubb will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Forli 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 3:30 pm on CITTA’ DI FORLI’. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.9
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe -> 1.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-25 | 2-6 | 10-13 | 15-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-20 | 4-7 | 9-9 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-11 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2019 | 18-18 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 11-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 237, the German reached the 2nd round after beating Nerman Fatic 7-63 6-4.
In the 1st round, Cedrik-Marcel had a good straight sets win against Fatic (7-63 6-4). During the match, Stebe scored 90 points vs Fatic’s 77. Cedrik-Marcel was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Stebe struck 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (33/45) of his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The German broke Fatic 3 times after converting 20% of his break points (3/15).
Stebe has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (171-108). 4-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Stebe has a composed 37-20 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Cedrik-Marcel’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Forli 1 Challenger.
The German has an aggregate 4-0 win-loss record in 2022, 4-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 2 Challenger
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 46-25 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 11-5 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 347, the Brit reached the 2nd round after beating Giacomo Dambrosi 6-4 6-1, Jeremy Jahn 6-2 6-1 and Tung-Lin Wu 6-2 6-73 6-1.
In the 1st round, Paul defeated Wu (6-2 6-73 6-1). During the match Jubb scored 91 points vs Wu’s 67. Jubb was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb recorded 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Paul Jubb was very efficient on serve to win 79% (37/47) of his 1st serve and 73% (24/33) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Wu 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Jubb has a compiled 3-0 win-loss record in 2022, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stebe | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 60 |
| Pts | 90-77 | 209-137 |
| Total Points | 167 | 346 |
| Winners | 33 | 77 |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% |
Stebe played 1 match while Jubb competed in 3 matches. Jubb started his run from the qualifications while Stebe had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Paul Jubb conceded 1 set while Cedrik-Marcel Stebe hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Stebe has played 5 set(s) less than Jubb (2 vs 7). Therefore, Stebe played 37 games less than Jubb. The German scored 33 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Paul fired 77 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stebe | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 45/66 | 97/160 |
| %1st in | 68% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 33/45 | 77/97 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 47/63 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 75% |
Stebe recorded 4 aces . Jubb scored 11 aces (3.7 per match). Stebe won 73% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stebe | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 13 |
| Converted | 3/15 | 13/28 |
| % Converted | 20% | 46% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 33% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Cedrik-Marcel broke his opponent 3 times with a 20% conversion rate. Stebe lost his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Jubb broke his opponents 13 times with a 46% conversion rate. Paul conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stebe | |||
| R1 Fatic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 90-77 | 90-77 | |
| Total points | 167 | 167 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 45/66 | 45/66 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 33/45 | 33/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 11/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/15 | 3/15 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Jubb | |||||
| Q1 Dambrosi |
Q3 Jahn |
R1 Wu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-2 6-1 | 6-2 6-73 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 28 | 60 | |
| pts | 60-39 | 58-31 | 91-67 | 209-137 | |
| Total points | 99 | 89 | 158 | 346 | |
| Winners | 21 | 19 | 37 | 77 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 33% | 41% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 6 | 4 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 27/47 | 23/33 | 47/80 | 97/160 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 70% | 59% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 19/23 | 37/47 | 77/97 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 83% | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/20 | 7/10 | 24/33 | 47/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 70% | 73% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 6/11 | 4/9 | 13/28 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 55% | 44% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/1 | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWLW Tennis Scores in Forli 2 Challenger
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Borna GojoGojo (6-75 6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Marius CopilCopil (7-64 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (2-6 6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jack DraperDraper – Luca NardiNardi (6-0 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
