Xinyu Wang and Harriet Dart will play each other in the qualifications of the Melbourne Summer Set 2 for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 11:00 am on Court 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Xinyu Wang who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Xinyu Wang is the pick to win this match.
Xinyu Wang -> 1.53
Harriet Dart -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Xinyu Wang vs. Harriet Dart
There is no head to head record between Xinyu Wang and Harriet Dart since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Xinyu Wang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-26 | 20-18 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 32-17 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-27 | 8-14 | 5-5 | 15-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-26 | 10-9 | 6-8 | 14-6 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-10 | 6-6 | 2-1 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 101, the Chinese got to the qualifications after defeating Alicia Smith 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Smith (6-2 6-2). During the match, Wang scored 56 points vs Smith’s 37. Wang was extremely aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Wang scored just 1 ace in the encounter and she committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Xinyu Wang was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (17/22) of her 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. The Chinese broke Smith 5 times after converting 83% of her break points (5/6).
Wang has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 62% of her matches (133-80). 1-0 on hard in 2022. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wang has a composed83-51 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Wang has a compiled 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Melbourne
Wang has never competed in this tournament before.
Harriet Dart
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-27 | 12-12 | 3-7 | 5-3 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-32 | 27-19 | 1-3 | 6-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-29 | 17-15 | 1-5 | 4-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-23 | 17-12 | 8-4 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-11 | 5-4 | 2-5 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 123, Harriet reached the qualifications after beating Daria Snigur 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Dart had a good straight sets win against Snigur (6-4 6-2). During the match Dart scored 72 points vs Snigur’s 57. Harriet was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Dart couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Harriet Dart lost the serve twice and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Dart put 56% of her first serves in, winning 70% (19/27) of the points behind her 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Snigur 5 times after converting 38% of her break points (5/13).
The Brit has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wang | Dart |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 18 |
| Pts | 56-37 | 72-57 |
| Total Points | 93 | 129 |
| Winners | 17 | 19 |
| %Winners | 30% | 26% |
Both Wang and Dart played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Wang and Dart have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Wang played 2 games less than Dart. Xinyu scored 17 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Dart recorded 19 winners (26%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wang | Dart |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 22/43 | 27/48 |
| %1st in | 51% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 19/27 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 57% |
Wang bagged 1 ace . Dart didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Wang won 77% points behind her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Dart won 70% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wang | Dart |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 83% | 38% |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Chinese broke her opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Xinyu lost her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded. Dart broke her opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Harriet conceded her serve twice and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Wang | |||
| Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 56-37 | 56-37 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 22/43 | 22/43 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 17/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Dart | |||||||
| Q1 Snigur |
R1 Edmund |
R1 Edmund |
R1 Edmund |
R1 Edmund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 14 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 118 | |
| pts | 72-57 | – | – | – | – | 72-57 | |
| Total points | 129 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 129 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |||||
| %Winners | 26% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |||||
| 1st in | 27/48 | / | / | / | / | 27/48 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 19/27 | / | / | / | / | 19/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | / | / | / | / | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |||||
| Converted | 5/13 | / | / | / | / | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |||||
| Saved | 2/4 | 0/ | 0/ | 0/ | 0/ | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | – | – | – | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |||||
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWWLWL
LWLLLWLWWL Tennis Scores in Melbourne
- Gastao EliasElias – Renzo OlivoOlivo (1-6 6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hyeon ChungChung – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Peter PolanskyPolansky (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Irina-Camelia BeguBegu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Ellen PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Mayar SherifSherif (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasija SevastovaSevastova – Caroline GarciaGarcia (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – Astra SharmaSharma (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara – Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – Nina StojanovicStojanovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Harriet DartDart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliona BolsovaBolsova – Lin ZhuZhu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (2-2) – H2H and prediction
