Juan Pablo Varillas and Tomas Martin Etcheverry will face off in the quarter of the Lima 2 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 6:00 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juan Pablo Varillas who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juan Pablo Varillas is the pick to win this match.
Juan Pablo Varillas -> 1.74
Tomas Martin Etcheverry -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Juan Pablo Varillas vs. Tomas Martin Etcheverry
This will be the 2nd time that Juan Pablo Varillas and Tomas Martin Etcheverry play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Martin Etcheverry (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Martin Etcheverry won 6-2 2-6 7-5 in the quarter in the Cordenons Challenger back in August 2021.
Juan Pablo Varillas
Ranked no. 129, Pablo Patino-Samudio got to the quarter after beating Pedja Krstin 6-3 6-1 and Andrea Collarini 6-2 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Pablo Patino-Samudio had a good straight sets win against Collarini (6-2 6-1). During the match, Pablo Patino-Samudio scored 53 points vs Collarini’s 29. Juan was very aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pablo Patino-Samudio blasted 4 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults. Juan Pablo Varillas was very efficient on serve to win 89% (17/19) of his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Juan broke Collarini 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Pablo Patino-Samudio started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this competition to win 63% of the points he played.
Pablo Patino-Samudio has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (306-193). 48-17 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Pablo Patino-Samudio has a compiled276-165 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the year was winning the title in the Biella 5 Challenger where he overcame Guido Andreozzi in the final 6-3 6-1 and in the Santiago 2 Challenger where he overcame Sebastian Baez in the final 6-4 7-5.
Pablo Patino-Samudio has a compiled 48-20 win-loss record in 2021, 48-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lima 2 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2019. See his history.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Ranked no. 133 (career-high), Tomas got to the quarter after defeating Juan Pablo Ficovich 7-5 2-6 6-4 and Jesper De Jong 7-5 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Martin Etcheverry had a good straight sets win against De Jong (7-5 6-4). During the match Martin Etcheverry scored 74 points vs De Jong’s 61. Tomas was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Martin Etcheverry fired 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Tomas Martin Etcheverry lost the serve 4 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Martin Etcheverry put 74% of his first serves in, winning 66% (37/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 30% (6/20) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break De Jong 6 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Tomas started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
His best result of the year was winning the title in the Perugia Challenger where he beat Vitaliy Sachko in the final 7-5 6-2 and in the Trieste Challenger where he defeated Thiago Agustin Tirante in the final 6-1 6-1.
Martin Etcheverry has an aggregate 56-24 win-loss record in 2021, 55-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Martin Etcheverry |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
Tot Games | 31 | 52 |
Pts | 122-73 | 167-155 |
Total Points | 195 | 322 |
Winners | 38 | 78 |
%Winners | 31% | 47% |
Both Pablo Patino-Samudio and Martin Etcheverry played 2 matches. At the moment, Tomas Martin Etcheverry dropped 1 set while Juan Pablo Varillas hasn’t dropped a set so far. Pablo Patino-Samudio has played 1 set(s) less than Martin Etcheverry (4 vs 5). Therefore, Pablo Patino-Samudio played 21 games less than Martin Etcheverry. Juan scored 38 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Martin Etcheverry fired 78 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Martin Etcheverry |
---|---|---|
Aces | 15 | 10 |
Avg per match | 7.5 | 5 |
1st in | 45/80 | 113/158 |
%1st in | 56% | 72% |
1st pts | 38/45 | 78/113 |
%1st pts | 84% | 69% |
2nd pts | 19/35 | 16/45 |
%2nd pts | 54% | 36% |
Pablo Patino-Samudio struck 15 aces (7.5 per match). Martin Etcheverry blasted 10 aces (5 per match). Pablo Patino-Samudio won 84% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Martin Etcheverry won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 36% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Martin Etcheverry |
---|---|---|
Won | 11 | 10 |
Converted | 11/27 | 10/17 |
% Converted | 41% | 59% |
Conceded | 3 | 21 |
Saved | 1 | 13 |
% Saved | 33% | 62% |
Times Broken | 2 | 8 |
Juan broke his opponents 11 times with a 41% conversion rate. The Peruvian surrendered his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Tomas broke his opponents 10 times with a 59% conversion rate. Tomas conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
Pablo Patino-Samudio | ||||
R1 Krstin |
R2 Collarini |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-1 | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 15 | 31 | |
pts | 69-44 | 53-29 | 122-73 | |
Total points | 113 | 82 | 195 | |
Winners | 21 | 17 | 38 | |
%Winners | 30% | 32% | 31% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 11 | 4 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
1st in | 26/44 | 19/36 | 45/80 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 53% | 56% | |
1st pts | 21/26 | 17/19 | 38/45 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 89% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 8/18 | 11/17 | 19/35 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 65% | 54% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
Converted | 6/19 | 5/8 | 11/27 | |
Converted % | 32% | 63% | 41% | |
Conceded | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 0/0 | 1 | |
Saved % | 33% | – | 17% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Martin Etcheverry | ||||
R1 Pablo Ficovich |
R2 De Jong |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 22 | 52 | |
pts | 93-94 | 74-61 | 167-155 | |
Total points | 187 | 135 | 322 | |
Winners | 41 | 37 | 78 | |
%Winners | 44% | 50% | 47% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
1st in | 57/82 | 56/76 | 113/158 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 74% | 72% | |
1st pts | 41/57 | 37/56 | 78/113 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 66% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 10/25 | 6/20 | 16/45 | |
% 2nd pts | 40% | 30% | 36% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 6/6 | 10/17 | |
Converted % | 36% | 100% | 59% | |
Conceded | 7 | 14 | 21 | |
Saved | 3/7 | 10/14 | 13 | |
Saved % | 43% | 71% | 57% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 | 8 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hugo DellienDellien – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Vit KoprivaKopriva (1-0) – H2H and prediction