Cem Ilkel and Govind Nanda will fight against each other in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on STADIUM 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cem Ilkel who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cem Ilkel is the pick to win this match.
Cem Ilkel -> 1.39
Govind Nanda -> 3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cem Ilkel vs. Govind Nanda
There is no head to head record between Cem Ilkel and Govind Nanda since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 179, Ilkel got to the qualifications after defeating Maxime Janvier 6-2 6-74 7-64.
In the qualifications, Ilkel defeated Janvier (6-2 6-74 7-64). During the match, Ilkel scored 111 points vs Janvier’s 101. Cem was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ilkel managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Cem Ilkel was pretty efficient on serve to win 74% (46/62) of his 1st serve and 58% (26/45) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Cem broke Janvier 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Ilkel has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (309-222). 15-7 on hard in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ilkel has an aggregate222-121 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Cem’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Pozoblanco Challenger.
Cem has a compiled 28-22 win-loss record in 2021, 15-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
The Turk has never competed in this tournament before.
Govind Nanda
Ranked no. 520, the American got to the qualifications after defeating Mitchell Krueger 0-6 7-610 7-5.
In the qualifications against Krueger, Govind recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (0-6 7-610 7-5).-111) than Krueger. In fact, the world no. 179 won 111 points vs Krueger’s. That means that Nanda was more focused during the important points. Govind was very aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Nanda recorded 10 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Govind Nanda lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Nanda put 65% of his first serves in, winning 65% (48/74) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (14/39) on the 2nd serve. Nanda broke Krueger 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Wichita.
Govind has a compiled 17-9 win-loss record in 2021, 15-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Govind has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ilkel | Nanda |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 34 | 31 |
Pts | 111-101 | 111-120 |
Total Points | 212 | 231 |
Winners | 46 | 48 |
%Winners | 41% | 43% |
Both Ilkel and Nanda played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Cem Ilkel conceded 1 set, while Govind Nanda conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Ilkel and Nanda have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Ilkel played 3 games more than Nanda. The Turk scored 46 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Govind bagged 48 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ilkel | Nanda |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 10 |
Avg per match | 6 | 10 |
1st in | 62/107 | 74/113 |
%1st in | 58% | 65% |
1st pts | 46/62 | 48/74 |
%1st pts | 74% | 65% |
2nd pts | 26/45 | 14/39 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 36% |
Ilkel scored 6 aces . Nanda scored 10 aces . Ilkel won 74% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Nanda won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 36% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ilkel | Nanda |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/10 | 3/10 |
% Converted | 40% | 30% |
Conceded | 8 | 11 |
Saved | 6 | 6 |
% Saved | 75% | 55% |
Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Cem broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Ilkel surrendered his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Nanda broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Govind conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded.
Ilkel | |||
Q1 Janvier |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-74 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
pts | 111-101 | 111-101 | |
Total points | 212 | 212 | |
Winners | 46 | 46 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 62/107 | 62/107 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 46/62 | 46/62 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 26/45 | 26/45 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Nanda | |||
Q1 Krueger |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 0-6 7-610 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 111-120 | 111-120 | |
Total points | 231 | 231 | |
Winners | 48 | 48 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 10 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 74/113 | 74/113 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 48/74 | 48/74 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 14/39 | 14/39 | |
% 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Philipp KohlschreiberKohlschreiber – Taro DanielDaniel (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andy MurrayMurray – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Renzo OlivoOlivo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Jordan ThompsonThompson (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Ivo KarlovicKarlovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Gianluca MagerMager (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Matteo ViolaViola (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack SockSock – John MillmanMillman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Aleksandar VukicVukic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Christopher EubanksEubanks (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Joao SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Guido PellaPella (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Sam QuerreyQuerrey (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Feliciano LopezLopez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Steve JohnsonJohnson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction