![Prediction And Head To Head Tristan Lamasine Vs. Mirza Basic 8lt33iub7t Prediction and head to head Tristan Lamasine vs. Mirza Basic](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Tristan-Lamasine-vs.-Mirza-Basic-8Lt33iUB7T.jpg)
Tristan Lamasine and Mirza Basic will face off in the 2nd round of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:30 am on COURT 7. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mirza Basic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mirza Basic is the pick to win this match.
Mirza Basic -> 1.63
Tristan Lamasine -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Lamasine vs. Mirza Basic
This will be the 2nd time that Tristan Lamasine and Mirza Basic square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Lamasine (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Lamasine won 6-2 7-5 in the quarter in Italy F28 back in 1970.
Tristan Lamasine
Ranked no. 257, Tristan got to the 2nd round after defeating Evgeny Karlovskiy 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Karlovskiy (6-3 6-3). During the match, Lamasine scored 63 points vs Karlovskiy’s 46. Tristan was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lamasine fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Tristan Lamasine was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 74% (29/39) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lamasine was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Karlovskiy 3 times.
Lamasine has a good match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (303-251). 12-11 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lamasine has an overall 127-110 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Lamasine has an aggregate 20-19 win-loss record in 2021, 12-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Lamasine has never competed in this tournament before.
Mirza Basic
Ranked no. 268, the Bosnian reached the 2nd round after beating Pablo Andujar 5-7 7-5 6-0.
In the 1st round against Andujar, Mirza recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-5 6-0). During the match Basic scored 106 points vs Andujar’s 90. Mirza was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Basic made 3 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mirza Basic lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Basic put 60% of his first serves in, winning 62% (38/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (21/40) on the 2nd serve. Basic broke Andujar 8 times after converting 53% of his break points (8/15).
The Bosnian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Almaty 2 Challenger.
Mirza has an aggregate 27-14 win-loss record in 2021, 13-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lamasine | Basic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 18 | 30 |
Pts | 63-46 | 106-90 |
Total Points | 109 | 196 |
Winners | 29 | 38 |
%Winners | 46% | 36% |
Both Lamasine and Basic played 1 match. At the moment, Mirza Basic conceded 1 set while Tristan Lamasine hasn’t conceded a set so far. Lamasine has played 1 set(s) less than Basic (2 vs 3). Therefore, Lamasine played 12 games less than Basic. Tristan scored 29 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Mirza recorded 38 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lamasine | Basic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 3 |
Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
1st in | 39/60 | 61/101 |
%1st in | 65% | 60% |
1st pts | 29/39 | 38/61 |
%1st pts | 74% | 62% |
2nd pts | 13/21 | 21/40 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 53% |
Lamasine managed to score 3 aces . Basic recorded 3 aces . Lamasine won 74% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Basic won 62% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lamasine | Basic |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 8 |
Converted | 3/3 | 8/15 |
% Converted | 100% | 53% |
Conceded | 2 | 11 |
Saved | 2 | 6 |
% Saved | 100% | 55% |
Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Lamasine broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Lamasine had a solid display on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. Mirza broke his opponent 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. Mirza conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded.
Lamasine | |||
R1 Karlovskiy |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 63-46 | 63-46 | |
Total points | 109 | 109 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 39/60 | 39/60 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 29/39 | 29/39 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Basic | |||
R1 Andujar |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 5-7 7-5 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 106-90 | 106-90 | |
Total points | 196 | 196 | |
Winners | 38 | 38 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 61/101 | 61/101 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 38/61 | 38/61 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
2nd pts | 21/40 | 21/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 8 | 8 | |
Converted | 8/15 | 8/15 | |
Converted % | 53% | 53% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Julian LenzLenz – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (5-7 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Evan FurnessFurness (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Jelle SelsSels (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Julien CagninaCagnina – Mischa ZverevZverev (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Lukas KleinKlein (1-6 7-65 7-66) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (6-2 6-70 6-4) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Pablo AndujarAndujar (5-7 7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Julien CagninaCagnina – Mischa ZverevZverev (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirza BasicBasic – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Julian LenzLenz – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Nicolas JarryJarry (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction