Nadia Podoroska and Camila Giorgi will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Rogers Cup for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on Court Rogers. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Camila Giorgi who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Camila Giorgi is the pick to win this match.
Camila Giorgi -> 1.53
Nadia Podoroska -> 2.58
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nadia Podoroska vs. Camila Giorgi
This will be the 3rd time that Nadia Podoroska and Camila Giorgi play each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Podoroska (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Podoroska won 6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 in the 2nd round in Linz back in 2020.
Highlights Nadia Podoroska vs Camila Giorgi – Linz 12-November-2020
Nadia Podoroska
Ranked no. 38, Nadia got to the 2nd round after defeating Magda Linette 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, Podoroska had a good straight sets win against Linette (6-1 6-2). During the match, Podoroska scored 56 points vs Linette’s 33. Podoroska was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Podoroska blasted 2 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Nadia Podoroska was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 73% (19/26) of her 1st serve and 75% (12/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nadia broke Linette 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Podoroska has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 67% of her matches (272-137). 9-8 on hard in 2021. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Podoroska has an aggregate94-56 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Nadia has a composed 16-15 win-loss record in 2021, 9-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Toronto
Nadia has never competed in this tournament before.
Camila Giorgi
Ranked no. 71, the Italian reached the 2nd round after defeating Elise Mertens 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round, Camila had a good straight sets win against Mertens (6-3 7-5). During the match Giorgi scored 75 points vs Mertens’s 58. Giorgi was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Giorgi struck 5 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Camila Giorgi lost the serve once and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Giorgi put 70% of her first serves in, winning 70% (37/53) of the points behind her 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the 2nd serve. Giorgi was clinical in her return game without wasting any break point and break Mertens 3 times.
The Italian’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Eastbourne.
The Italian has a composed 18-12 win-loss record in 2021, 6-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Podoroska | Giorgi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 21 |
| Pts | 56-33 | 75-58 |
| Total Points | 89 | 133 |
| Winners | 19 | 37 |
| %Winners | 34% | 49% |
Both Podoroska and Giorgi played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Podoroska and Giorgi have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Podoroska played 6 games less than Giorgi. The Argentine scored 19 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Giorgi recorded 37 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Podoroska | Giorgi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
| 1st in | 26/42 | 53/76 |
| %1st in | 62% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 37/53 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 14/23 |
| %2nd pts | 75% | 61% |
Podoroska made 2 aces . Giorgi scored 5 aces . Podoroska won 73% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Giorgi won 70% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Podoroska | Giorgi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/3 |
| % Converted | 71% | 100% |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 |
| Saved | 2 | 8 |
| % Saved | 100% | 89% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Podoroska broke her opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Argentine quite strong on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. Giorgi broke her opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Italian conceded her serve once and she saved 89% of the break points that she conceded.
| Podoroska | |||
| R1 Linette |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 56-33 | 56-33 | |
| Total points | 89 | 89 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/42 | 26/42 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 19/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 12/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Giorgi | |||
| R1 Mertens |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 75-58 | 75-58 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 53/76 | 53/76 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 37/53 | 37/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 14/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 8/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 89% | 89% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLLLW
LWLWLLLLW Tennis Scores in Montreal
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Fiona FerroFerro (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Harriet DartDart (6-1 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza (6-2 0-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Domagoj BiljeskoBiljesko – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (4-6 6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rrezart CunguCungu – Pascal MeisMeis (2-6 6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Ricardo Urzua-RiveraUrzua-Rivera (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Mick VeldheerVeldheer (6-0 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Victoria AzarenkaVictoria – Sorana CirsteaSorana (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Sloane StephensStephens (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Rebecca MarinoMarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Karolina PliskovaPliskova – Donna VekicVekic (5-1) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Oceane DodinDodin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cori GauffGauff – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Johanna KontaKonta – Elina SvitolinaSvitolina (0-5) – H2H and prediction
- Simona HalepHalep – Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Darya KasatkinaKasatkina (1-2) – H2H and prediction
