Maddison Inglis and Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove will play each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 2nd time in their career. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove is the pick to win this match.
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove -> 1.53
Maddison Inglis -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Maddison Inglis vs. Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
This will be the 2nd time that Maddison Inglis and Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kerkhove (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on grass.
The last time that they locked horns, Kerkhove won 6-1 6-4 in the 1st round in Nottingham back in June 2021.
Maddison Inglis
Ranked no. 140, Maddison got to the qualifications after defeating Natalija Kostic 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Maddison had a good straight sets win against Kostic (6-2 6-1). During the match, Inglis scored 64 points vs Kostic’s 43. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Inglis blasted 3 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Maddison Inglis lost the serve once and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Inglis put 74% of her first serves in, winning 65% (22/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the 2nd serve. Maddison broke Kostic 6 times after converting 67% of her break points (6/9).
Inglis has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 63% of her matches (149-89). 1-2 on grass in 2021. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Inglis has a composed11-8 record in the last 6 years on grass.
Maddison has an overall 5-6 win-loss record in 2021, 1-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously at Wimbledon
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Ranked no. 175, Kerkhove got to the qualifications after defeating Daniela Seguel 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Kerkhove had a good straight sets win against Seguel (6-4 6-2). During the match Kerkhove scored 73 points vs Seguel’s 56. Kerkhove was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Kerkhove scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove lost the serve once and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Kerkhove put 58% of her first serves in, winning 70% (21/30) of the points behind her 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the 2nd serve. Kerkhove broke Seguel 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
The Dutch’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the W25 Potchefstroom.
Kerkhove has an aggregate 14-16 win-loss record in 2021, 4-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Inglis | Kerkhove |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 15 | 18 |
Pts | 64-43 | 73-56 |
Total Points | 107 | 129 |
Winners | 22 | 21 |
%Winners | 34% | 29% |
Both Inglis and Kerkhove played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Inglis and Kerkhove have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Inglis played 3 games less than Kerkhove. Maddison scored 22 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Kerkhove recorded 21 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Inglis | Kerkhove |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 1 |
Avg per match | 3 | 1 |
1st in | 34/46 | 30/52 |
%1st in | 74% | 58% |
1st pts | 22/34 | 21/30 |
%1st pts | 65% | 70% |
2nd pts | 9/12 | 15/22 |
%2nd pts | 75% | 68% |
Inglis managed to score 3 aces . Kerkhove recorded 1 ace . Inglis won 65% points on her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Kerkhove won 70% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Inglis | Kerkhove |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 4 |
Converted | 6/9 | 4/8 |
% Converted | 67% | 50% |
Conceded | 5 | 4 |
Saved | 4 | 3 |
% Saved | 80% | 75% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Maddison broke her opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Australian dropped her serve once and she saved 80% of the break points that she conceded. The Dutch broke her opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded her serve once and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded.
Inglis | |||
Q1 Kostic |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 64-43 | 64-43 | |
Total points | 107 | 107 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 34/46 | 34/46 | |
% 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
1st pts | 22/34 | 22/34 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 9/12 | 9/12 | |
% 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Kerkhove | |||
Q1 Seguel |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 73-56 | 73-56 | |
Total points | 129 | 129 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 29% | 29% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 30/52 | 30/52 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 21/30 | 21/30 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 15/22 | 15/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores at the Wimbledon
- Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure – Allie KiickKiick (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Tara MooreMoore – Renata ZarazuaZarazua (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Kristina KucovaKucova – Jia-Jing LuLu (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Anastasia GasanovaGasanova – Valeria SavinykhSavinykh (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Gabriela TalabaTalaba (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Georgina Garcia-PerezGarcia-Perez (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Lesley Pattinama KerkhovePattinama Kerkhove – Daniela SeguelSeguel (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Harmony TanTan – Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Vitalia DiatchenkoDiatchenko – Na-Lae HanHan (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Isabella ShinikovaShinikova – Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo (2-6 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Tereza MrdezaMrdeza (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze – Eva ShawShaw (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Eden SilvaSilva – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Mayar SherifSherif – Irina FetecauFetecau (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jana FettFett – Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Monica NiculescuNiculescu – Ulrikke EikeriEikeri (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Natalia VikhlyantsevaVikhlyantseva (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Xiaodi YouYou (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko – Ankita RainaRaina (6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Daria SnigurSnigur (3-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Dalma GalfiGalfi (4-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Yafan WangWang – Maryna ZanevskaZanevska (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Kurumi NaraNara (6-3 6-76 6-1) – See score progression
- Kristie AhnAhn – Caroline DolehideDolehide (1-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Maddison InglisInglis – Natalija KosticKostic (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Mayo HibiHibi – Whitney OsuigweOsuigwe (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Indy De VroomeDe Vroome – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Astra SharmaSharma – Katharina GerlachGerlach (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Priscilla HonHon – Grace MinMin (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Georgina Garcia-PerezGarcia-Perez (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – En Shuo LiangShuo Liang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Panna UdvardyUdvardy – Veronica Cepede RoygCepede Royg (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marina MelnikovaMelnikova – Xiyu WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Irene Burillo EscorihuelaBurillo Escorihuela (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle LaoLao – Alexandra DulgheruDulgheru (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Urszula RadwanskaRadwanska – Fang Ying XunYing Xun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandra KrunicKrunic – Anna BondarBondar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Chihiro MuramatsuMuramatsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Olga DanilovicDanilovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lizette CabreraCabrera – Katie SwanSwan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Giulia Gatto-MonticoneGatto-Monticone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pemra OzgenOzgen – Magdalena FrechFrech (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Timea BabosBabos – Barbara HaasHaas (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza SmitkovaSmitkova – Jaqueline CristianCristian (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elitsa KostovaKostova – Destanee AiavaAiava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robin AndersonAnderson – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tsvetana PironkovaPironkova – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Naiktha BainsBains (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze – Varvara FlinkFlink (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara – Cristina BucsaBucsa (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mandy MinellaMinella – Kateryna BondarenkoBondarenko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Richel HogenkampHogenkamp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BenoitBenoit – Olga GovortsovaGovortsova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Eva Guerrero AlvarezGuerrero Alvarez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Simona WaltertWaltert (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ellen PerezPerez – Leonie KungKung (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julia GrabherGrabher – Katarina ZavatskaZavatska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Asia MuhammadMuhammad – Stefanie VoegeleVoegele (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe – Katarzyna KawaKawa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Indy De VroomeDe Vroome (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eden SilvaSilva – Katie VolynetsVolynets (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Jule NiemeierNiemeier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove – Maddison InglisInglis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yafan WangWang – Jana FettFett (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Tara MooreMoore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristie AhnAhn – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Anastasia GasanovaGasanova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Mayo HibiHibi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko – Harmony TanTan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – Isabella ShinikovaShinikova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristina KucovaKucova – Astra SharmaSharma (1-0) – H2H and prediction